Abatjour – lampshade; eyeshade; device like a reflector or skylight to direct light into a room.
Kiwiblog lists New Zealand’s place in a variety of international rankings:
- Rule of Law 6th
- Economic Freedom 5th
- Best to do business in 2nd
- Least Corrupt 1st
- Open Data 4th
- Prosperous 5th
- Best to be a woman 7th
- Competitiveness 18th
- Peaceful 3rd
- Democratic 5th
- Human Development 6th
- Best for working women 1st
- Freedom 1st
- Open Budget 2nd
- Best to be a mother 4th
- Humanitarian responses 3rd
- Smallest gender gap 5th
- Generous 1st
- Least failed 7th
- Trade competitiveness 4th
- Social progress 1st
No-one is suggesting there isn’t room for improvement in many areas.
But this is a list of which we can be proud.
Take a bow New Zealand.
Understanding Fonterra gets even harder – Pattrick Smellie:
Ask anyone with half an eye on the New Zealand economy what’s leading its current recovery and they’ll tell you two things.
First: the Canterbury rebuild.
And second: the extraordinary boom in both the price and volume of dairy industry exports.
The dairy boom being what it is, you’d think the country’s only multi-national company with global scale, Fonterra, would have produced a stonking half-year profit result last week.
Not so.. .
Pukeuri meatworks still waiting for China go-ahead - Daniel Birchfield:
A resolution to the ongoing certification issue surrounding Alliance Group’s Pukeuri plant looks no closer to being resolved.
The plant’s certification for China was suspended by the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) in July, after incorrectly labelled product was shipped to China.
Alliance Group general manager of processing, Kerry Stevens, said at this stage there was “no change” to the current situation.
Stevens declined to comment on how the issue at Pukeuri was affecting Timaru’s Smithfield plant in terms of staffing. . .
Farmers walk the environmental talk – Alan Wills:
. . . In a nut shell farming has a great future in New Zealand. We have our challenges but the long term future in my opinion is better than just good.
Why? We are naturally good farmers. We have the climate and water availability in some areas to take the vagrancies out of seasonal production. Globally this is called the ‘pastoral sweet spot’ and there aren’t too many countries in the world in it.
We have very good infrastructure here and abroad to effectively market what we produce. We have very focused research and development supporting us to stay on the front foot. Politically, our Westminister type democracy provides stability and stability begets confidence. I can think of one country that is like our twin except for politics and policies that shoots its economy in the foot. Here, nothing is going to fall over by revolution or in a coup.
Finally, we can produce food products in particular that the rest of developing world wants.
All of these attributes are vital in any successful production and marketing process. . .
The release of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment report’s chapter on Australasia, reinforces science, research and water storage are fundamental to New Zealand’s adaptive response.
“The IPCC report contains both good and bad news for the New Zealand farm system and New Zealand as a whole,” says Dr William Rolleston, Federated Farmers Vice-President, who has recently returned from the World Farmers Organisation’s General-Assembly.
“The report predicts that New Zealand will likely become drier in the northeast of the South Island as well as the east and north of the North Island. On the other side of the ledger, it will likely become wetter in the south of the South Island.
“This will change pest pressure and biosecurity risks and the effectiveness of biocontrols. . .
It was described by judges as an outstanding example of best dairying practise.
The region’s first Supreme title was presented to Gavin and Oliver Faull, Faull Farms, and their sharemilkers, Tony and Loie Penwarden, at a special Ballance Farm Environment Awards ceremony on April 3. . .
THE WORD improvisation can conjure images of ad hoc solutions and a slightly less than professional approach, but when it comes to precision agriculture, it’s not a dirty word: in fact, it’s exactly what’s needed, says one of New Zealand’s leading academics on the subject.
Out of necessity, New Zealand farmers have become inherently good at improvising over the years and that background will stand them in good stead with the growing array of precision farming techniques becoming available, says Professor of Precision Agriculture at Massey University Ian Yule. . .
Act leader Jamie White is challenging David Cunliffe to prove he’d be better at investing money than the private sector.
The Labour Party has announced a return to “industrial policy”. If elected, they will decide which businesses and sectors of the economy will deliver the highest returns and promote them in various ways – most obviously, by subsidising them with taxpayers’ money.
This policy effectively replaces the decisions of private investors with the decisions of Labour Party politicians. It would be a foolish policy if Labour Party politicians were not better investors than the private investors they will replace.
So, before asking people to vote for the policy, shouldn’t David Cunliffe prove that he and his colleagues really are better investors than those who do it professionally?
He could do this easily. Mr Cunliffe could set up a small investment fund – $5,000 would suffice to get started – and trade it in the months before the election. Since he claims to know better than private investors which businesses will give the best returns, his fund should massively outperform the NZX 50 and other stock market indices. . .
Mr Cunliffe talks a good game when it comes to investing. And he plans to put your money where his mouth is. But before anyone goes along with him, they should insist that he puts his own money where his mouth is.
So I challenge Mr Cunliffe. Trade the stock market in the months before the election. Publish your trades as you make them and explain how you arrived at your supposed knowledge of which investments are best. By the election we will be able to see if you really do know what you claim to.
If you won’t accept the challenge, then withdraw your proposal to use taxpayers’ money to invest in the businesses that take your fancy.
A defining feature of the National-led government since 2008 is a respect for public money because they understand it’s other people’s.
That has yet to penetrate the we-know-better fog which envelopes the left, all of whom are concentrating on how they’ll divide the national pie rather than working on how to make it bigger.
Internet Party founder Kim Dotcom will address the Mana Party annual conference in Rotorua next weekend ahead of Mana’s decision about whether to form an alliance with the Internet Party.
Mana leader Hone Harawira and Mr Dotcom met for the second time in Auckland over the weekend to discuss the potential relationship.
The Mana executive invited Mr Dotcom to speak and he accepted “to talk to and understand the view of Mana members,” a Mana statement says.
The speech will be late Saturday morning in the open session of the conference, which news media can attend. . .
What this does is guarantee that the conference will get more coverage than a wee party might otherwise get.
However, all publicity isn’t good publicity and any relationship with Dotcom and his Internet Party has the potential to tear Mana apart.
Those with principles will leave in disgust that the party would sell out for money.
Dotcom and Mana leader Hone Harawira have little in common politically except a hatred of John Key.
Keeping Stock calls it Dotcomana.
It has no principles.
All it has is two egos and no mana.
Organic production is better for the planet, isn’t it?
The Green Party which advocates for a far more organic production would have us believe it is but University of Waikato professor of agribusiness Jacqueline Rowarth says that isn’t so:
. . . People’s first consideration when buying food was price, despite claims they might buy based on factors like organic growth, she said.
While people might think buying organically or from the farmers market was environmentally friendly, research showed carbon dioxide emissions were higher buying that way, Prof Rowarth said.
A lot of so-called environmentally friendly policies, including buying local, organics, and recycling aren’t nearly as green as they’re painted.
Support for them are often based more on emotion than science.
The need for more of the latter was another point Prof Rowarth made:
. . . The future of ensuring the world’s population was nutritionally well fed was incorporating all the best technology, including the strategic use of genetic engineering, she said during a public lecture at the University of Otago yesterday.
There also needed to be a greater research and innovation culture so advances could be made to feed the world’s ever-growing population.
”That is why in New Zealand we need to encourage everybody to become involved in science,” Prof Rowarth said.
The downsizing of the Crown research campus at Invermay and the discussions about making science elective at school in year 11 did not meet that brief, she said.
”Nutrition depends on agriculture which depends on an understanding of the soil.” . . .
Scientific research and advances have and will continue to improve agriculture and nutrition.
There were plenty of examples of how the past few hundred years of science had helped increase the yield from plants and animals, improving human nutrition.
Advances in wheat and milk production were prime examples.
The benefits of this were highlighted in the fact that the percentage of the world’s population that was malnourished had dropped significantly from 34% in 1969 to 17% in recent years, even though the population had grown massively.
”More people are fed to a better level of nutrition. It is a triumph of agriculture.” . . .
A triumph of agriculture based on science and hard work.
Prof Rowarth also dispelled a few modern-day myths on modern food consumption, pointing to literature showing in real dollars food was cheaper than it had ever been, even though it ”didn’t feel like it”.
People could now afford to buy fresh fruit and vegetables, as they were more affordable than ever, and what they should be worried about was their consumption of highly processed foods.
”Back in 1912 you were lucky to get vegetables, maybe a carrot or potato.” . .
Cheaper doesn’t mean cheap but we have a far wider range of food at prices which make the cost of feeding ourselves a lower percentage of most household budgets than it was for previous generations.
An increase in organic production and buying local will reduce yield, choice and increase prices and the environmental worth of such practices isn’t backed up by science.
Winston Peters says that the issue of foreign ownership of farms and residential property has always been a bottom line for New Zealand First.
“The reality is that’s always been a bottom line for New Zealand First.”
Read his lips – always has been is not quite the same as is now or will always be.
“We are making it very clear where we stand in this election. People out there don’t want wiffle waffle they want certainty. . .
He’s right we don’t want wiffle waffle.
But wiffle waffle is what we often get from him and it’s what we’re still getting on the question of which party New Zealand First would be prepared to support should he be in a position to do so after the election.
He continues to say it’s up to the voters, as it is. But voters who know if Winston and his sycophants would be prepared to enter a coalition with or give confidence and supply to, one party or another would be able to vote with their eyes open.
As it stands anyone silly enough to favour New Zealand First with a vote will be taking a stab in the dark.
If you can cope with the wiffle waffle, you can listen to the interview on Q & A.