Peculate – embezzle money, especially public funds; to steal, or take dishonestly, or misuse money or property entrusted to one’s care.
Our farmers are better than ‘No. 8 wire’ thinkers – Julia Jones:
The much-used Kiwi phrase ‘No. 8-wire mentality’ has long been considered the way we do things in the farming world, but Head of Analytics at NZX Julia Jones is wondering if its value has now expired.
Yes, “No. 8-wire mentality” is cute, and it’s a little bit funny, but what I hear when people say it is: not asking for help, roughly stringing something together without a plan, a rip-shit-and-bust kind of attitude, a default solution and a broken piece of wire holding something together within inches of its life.
I just don’t see how this is something for us to strive towards for the future; we deserve better than being seen as No. 8-wire thinkers, because we are far more than that. . .
Let’s get behind our rural community – Kerre McIvor:
A couple of years ago, almost to the day, I wrote a column calling for there to be a Cockietober – a month to celebrate farmers and their invaluable contribution to the economy.
I felt, back in 2017, that farmers had got a rough ride during the election campaign, and that farmers were getting it in the neck unfairly. They were being blamed for the poor water quality in New Zealand despite the fact that city dwellers are letting literal and metaphorical crap flow into their harbours and rivers. They were being told how to manage their stock by people who’d never set foot on a farm. They were told they didn’t pay their workers enough, they were being told they were destroying the planet by providing milk and meat for consumers, they were told they mistreated their animals.
I thought things were bad two years ago. But it appears things have got much, much worse.
In an open letter to the nation, BakerAg, a rural business consultancy firm, has called for people to get in behind our rural community. Director Chris Garland says morale among the company’s farming clients is as low now as it was in the Rogernomics years of the late 80s and during the GFC. . .
Jigsaw has four families in picture – Annette Scott:
Four families working together presents challenges but equally it’s provided disproportionate opportunities for the Guild clan on High Peak Station, farm operations manager Hamish Guild says. Annette Scott visited High Peak to learn how the pieces of the large farming puzzle have come together.
High Peak Station is a spectacular 3780 hectare, high-country farm near the Rakaia Gorge in Canterbury.
The Guild family bought the traditional pastoral farming property in 1973, originally running just sheep and beef with deer added in the late 1970s.
It was a case of having to look at a new way of making the property viable.
“Dad (James) and his brother Colin took up farming High Peak, moving from their family cropping farm at Temuka (South Canterbury) when their father, my grandfather Alastair, decided High Peak was for us,” Hamish said. . .
Farmers ‘dead keen’ to improve water practices – council – Alexa Cook:
A group of farmers near Whakatāne are working with the regional council to try and improve water quality by changing the way they farm.
Agribusiness consultant Ailson Dewes has gathered about 15 dairy farmers on behalf of the Bay of Plenty Regional Council to understand more about how their farming systems can impact water quality.
Ms Dewes said the group was facing the issue head-on.
“They are sitting around the table, they are exposing all their numbers in terms of the health of their business, their environmental footprint, the way they farm – and they’re saying ‘we realise the way we farmed in the past is not the way we can farm in the future’.
“They are dead keen to solve problems and find new ways to farm with a lower footprint.” . .
Joe Ngan was born in 1932 in a small village near Guangzhou in southern China.
He’s now 87 and lives near his two kiwifruit orchards in Kerikeri, Northland.
But getting to his home of 40 years was a scary and long-winded affair.
When Joe was two, his mother died while giving birth to his sister, leaving Joe and elder brother Sun virtually as orphans. Their father was working in New Zealand. . .
No four pounds of beef doesn’t equal a transit-Atlantic flight – Frank Mitloehner and Darren Hudsonnk:
A story in The New Yorker came out this week about Dr. Pat Brown, the founder of Impossible Foods. If readers scan the headline and subhead, they’ll get the gist of what author Tad Friend is trying to say: “Can a plant based burger help solve climate change? Eating meat creates huge environmental costs. Impossible Foods thinks it has a solution.”
That’s unfortunate. It might even be dangerous. In the article, Mr. Friend writes that “Every four pounds of beef you eat contributes to as much global warming as flying from New York to London – the average American eats that much each month.”
If only. . .
When Jacinda Ardern declared hers would be an open and transparent government this probably wasn’t what she was meaning:
Controversial Cabinet Minister Shane Jones told a forestry awards ceremony they needed to vote for him or miss out on the billions he’s handing out for provincial growth, it has been alleged.
One person present labelled Jones’ comments as an inducement to “bribery” and another thought the minister – responsible for forestry and the $3 billion provincial growth fund – was “buying votes”.
But Jones says New Zealand can expect him to remind it over the next 12 months that votes for New Zealand First are needed to ensure it continues to fulfil promises in its coalition agreement with Labour.
“When you get a retail politician like myself – a son of the north – you’ve never going to take the politics out of the politicians.” . .
There’s politics and there’s politicking and then there’s blatant vote-for-us-or-else which looks very close to bribery.
Another person who paid close attention to Jones’ speech said he was angry and shocked at the political approach.
“Some of the things he said I didn’t particularly like. [It was] he had this big pot of gold so make sure you keep voting for me. There were direct comments along those lines.”
A third person who objected to Jones’ comment said it detracted from the intent of the evening, which was to celebrate excellence in forestry.
“It should never have been a political rally, which is what he made it. He was saying ‘if you don’t vote for me, you won’t get any share of the billion dollars’. He said you’ve only got a few months of me here, so you’d better vote.
“It’s just bribery. I thought that was pretty disgusting.”
Another person present said: “It wasn’t a political forum. He didn’t do himself any good. He just made a complete idiot of himself.”
Those interviewed did not want to be named, citing the influence of Jones’ Provincial Growth Fund and concerns speaking openly could have a personal and financial impact.
Whether it was meant as a threat or not, these people have not only interpreted what Jones said as vote-for-us-or-else, they’re scared about the consequences of speaking out.
What he said is bad enough. That he said it so openly is worse. It shows that he thinks he’s immune from any censor by both his leader and the Prime Minister that ought to follow this behavior but won’t.
Reacting to the Herald piece, Taxpayers’ Union Spokesman Jordan Williams said:
“This is truely banana republic stuff. A Minister telling an industry sector that they need to pony up with support, or else lose taxpayer funded lavish.”
”It is shocking, and belongs in Namibia, not New Zealand.”
“Even for Shane Jones this is breathtakingly shameless. This not only sours the reputation of the current Government, it sours the reputation of our whole political establishment. It is pork barrel politics in its true meaning.”
“Taxpayers are relying on the Prime Minister to prevent Shane Jones dragging us down the transparency indexes. Now is the time for her to show whether she demands western democracy standards of her Ministers, or whether her junior coalition partner wields the true power and can do what they like with public funds.”
Sadly the junior coalition partner does wield the true power and its members not only can and do do what they like with public funds, at least one is open that they’re vote-buying with them.