The threat of an emissions tax on farmers is growing:
Livestock farmers could face an initial greenhouse gas emissions tax of $50 million a year rising to $1 billion, Interim Climate Change Committee David Prentice says. . .
The $50m is subsidised by the Government allocating units equivalent to 95% of emissions to the primary sector to help it transition and is calculated on a carbon price of $25 a tonne.
However, the tax might rise to $1b at an indeterminate time in the future.
The figures are in a discussion document delivered to the Agricultural Climate Change Conference in Palmerston North by Prentice. . .
The document, on the committee’s website, reveals the committee’s thinking on charges farmers will face as the Government moves the economy to be carbon neutral by 2020.
Adding insult to the financial injury is the government’s blanket refusal to allow genetic engineering which could provide at least part of the answer to reduced emissions.
It says an emission tax levied at farm level could be implemented from 2025. In the interim it could be collected by processors from next year.
That will give certainty to the primary sector, respond to calls for agriculture to meet its emissions’ obligations and raise awareness with farmers who will see the deduction on kill sheets and milk receipts.
This would average the cost.
That would reduce the incentive to take action, punishe farmers who have lower emissions and insulate those with higher ones from the consequences of their actions, or inaction.
Money raised will be used to introduction the policy but also to help rural communities cope with the likely loss of jobs and services such as schools as farming families leave areas when farmland is planted in trees to offset emissions.
The committee is investigating the impact on rural communities. . .
The committee only needs to look at what happened to rural communities during and after the ag-sag of the 1980s.
Jobs were lost, people moved in search of work, businesses which serviced and supplied farmers failed, adult children left for education or jobs and didn’t return . . .
Add costs to production with an emissions tax, replace stock with trees and there will be a similar impact.
It will have a detrimental economic and social impact, increase the cost of food and won’t do anything for the environment because loss of production here will be replaced by an increase in other countries whose methods are far less efficient than hours.