Crafar farm bid approved

Land Information Minister Maurice Williamson and Associate Finance Minister Jonathan Coleman have accepted the Overseas Investment Office recommendation to approve the sale of the 16 Crafar farms to  Milk New Zealand Holding Limited (Milk New Zealand), a subsidiary of Shanghai company Pengxin.

“It is clear that all criteria under sections 16 and 18 of the Overseas Investment Act 2005 have been met, therefore we accept the recommendation of the OIO to grant consent,” Mr Williamson said.

“We are satisfied that Milk New Zealand’s application for consent meets the criteria set out in the Act,” Mr Coleman said.

The approval follows the receivers, KordaMentha’s acceptance in late 2010 of Milk New Zealand’s bid for the farms.

Milk New Zealand’s acquisition will further support the supply of high quality dairy products into the Chinese market and help set the foundations for further economic and export opportunities with China.

Stringent conditions policed by the OIO will ensure that Milk New Zealand’s investment delivers substantial and identifiable benefits to New Zealand. These include investing more than $14m into the farms making them more economically and environmentally sustainable; protecting the Nga Herenga  and the Te Ruaki pa sites and improving walking access to the Pureora Forest Park and Te Rere falls.  An on-farm training facility for dairy farm workers will also be established.

If the application meets the Act’s criteria the ministers had little choice but to approve the bid.

But this won’t be the end of the matter:

A press release just issued by the Michael Fay backed Crafar Farms Purchase Group says the decision to approve the farm sale to Shanghai Pengxin Group was “wrong in law and, if not overturned by Judicial Review, sets up open season for any foreign buyers wanting New Zealand land.”

The Group said it is the highest New Zealand bidder ($171.5 million), offering $21.5 million more than the Government’s farming SOE, Landcorp.

The Group confirmed it would proceed with a Judicial Review launched earlier this week to try to stop the land from being sold offshore.

But the Herald puts the purchase of the farms into perspective:

The 16 Crafar farms have a combined area of approximately 7,893 hectares.

In the last two years, consent was granted for overseas persons to acquire 357,056 hectares of agricultural land.

Consents granted involving agricultural land by country of majority ownership, are:

* United States to acquire 25,306 hectares of farm land

* Germany to acquire 6,834 hectares of farm land

* Switzerland 9,727 hectares of farm land

* Australia 3,861 hectares of farm land

* United Kingdom 22,600 hectares of farm land

* Hong Kong to acquire 759 hectares of farm land

I don’t remember any fuss over any of those sales nor over the sale of a total of 650,000 to foreigners approved by Labour in the nine years it was in government.

There are very stringent conditions on the sale:

  • The individuals with control of Milk New Zealand must continue to be of good character
  • Milk New Zealand must invest a minimum of NZD $14m in the properties
  • Milk New Zealand and their associates must not acquire an ownership or control interest in milk processing facilities in New Zealand unless a 50% or more ownership or control interest in those facilities is held by non-overseas persons
  • Milk New Zealand must establish an on-farm training facility for dairy farm workers and must meet the capital cost of establishing this facility
  • Milk New Zealand must give two scholarships of not less than NZD $5,000 each year to students of the on-farm training facility with the first two scholarships to be awarded by 31 December 2013
  • Milk New Zealand must use reasonable endeavours to assist Landcorp to extend its business to, and market its products, in China
  • Milk New Zealand must provide public walking access over Benneydale Farm and Taharua Station, in consultation with the Department of Conservation  and the New Zealand Walking Access Commission
  • Milk New Zealand must take reasonable steps to protect and enhance existing areas of significant indigenous vegetation and significant habitats of indigenous fauna and flora on the properties
  • Milk New Zealand must register a heritage covenant in respect of the Te Ruaki pa site on Tiwhaiti Farm
  • If required by the Office of Treaty Settlements, the Applicant must transfer the Nga Herenga pa site (approximately 1.6ha located on Benneydale Farm) to the Crown for nil consideration.

The third point, restricting ownership or control of milk processing here to no more than a 50% share, should allay concerns about food safety and standards.

The OIO’s recommendation is here; the decision summary is here  and background information here.

The only question I’m left with is why the receivers insisted on selling the operation as a whole rather than offering up individual farms.

They say they would not have got as much that way but I find that difficult to believe. The demand for individual farms would have been much greater than it was for the whole operation and therefore the price ought to have been higher.

 

14 Responses to Crafar farm bid approved

  1. Fay is an opportunistic investor whipping up xenophobia against Chinese for his own benefit, which is why the arch xenophobe Winston Peters has formed an unholy alliance with him in this instance. David Shearer has ill advisedly joined in this as well on Fay’s side.

    Hundreds of thousands of hectares have been sold to white investors with nary a complaint, but now… shock horror nasty yellow people.

    Fay is being opportunistic, Peters playing the race card and Shearer is naive with advice from hypocrites in his party who happily sold off much more land.

    Like

  2. homepaddock says:

    You sum it up well, Adam.

    Like

  3. some facts on what is involved as opposed to meaningless left wing abuse
    http://adamsmith.wordpress.com/2012/01/27/crafar-farms-some-facts-1/

    Like

  4. robertguyton says:

    Key is selling our stuff off to foreigners, under our noses.
    Your support for his treachery is not going unnoticed, Ele.
    Peters called it the ‘globalization of New Zealand’s resources’, and it is just that.
    Have you really thought this through, Ele?

    Like

  5. Andrei says:

    Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes

    A classical education is a thing of the past which is why our now uneducated elites are making such an basic and major error of judgement.

    What is Latin to speakers of Mandarin?

    Like

  6. fredinthegrass says:

    Tiddlywinks, Rg. And none of your wee counters are going anywhere near the cup. Look at recent history, and realise how insignificant this sale is in the broader context.
    While I am not an avid supporter of this type of sale it is preferable to the “Fay” bid.
    Dont go off at the PM. Look at the OIA and then lobby to change the rules if you dont like them.
    Your fixation with assassinating Mr. Key is clouding your reason and judgement,Rg.

    Like

  7. Northern says:

    @ Fred: Hear, hear! Brother Robert sometimes comes across as a measured, responsible representative of the Red-Greens, but every now and again his fanaticism shows through. You’re exactly right in saying that if he doesn’t like the law he should seek to change it. Even though he might not like it the Govt has been careful in following both the law and logic. We’re talking here of privately owned land and it’s surely absurd to suggest the Govt should interfere with a sale to the highest bidder, as long as the sale accords with the law – as it does. What does Borther Robert and his comrades want here: that the Crafar creditors (mostly small businesses) should lose out on any recovery of their debts? The various conditions imposed on the sale are extra safeguards too and will ensure this sale benefits the NZ economy and environment (the latter should appeal to all genuine Greens). Yes, Ele spells it all out with her customary good sense!

    Like

  8. robertguyton says:

    Fred – tiddliwinks is ‘my game’, I’m surprised you knew! The clatter of the wink in the cup has been music to my ears for many a year.
    This sale is ‘insignificant’, Fred only with regard its hectarage. It’s hardly a trifle politically, the sphere in which I’m regarding it. The ‘Fay’ bid, I made no comment about, so won’t mention, but I have to ask if you really believe I ‘went off at the PM’. I merely said ‘he’s selling our stuff”. Pretty light going-off. Do you really believe I have a fixation with “assassinating Mr. Key”, given the literal meaning of the phrase you used? Perhaps it’s your reason that is clouded, Fred!
    Northern – China doesn’t sell its land to foreigners. Nor does a raft of other countries. Nor should we. A government minister is able to make the decision not to sell. Key directs his ministers. If the land is sold, Key is responsible. That said, I almost admire your unbridled confidence and faith in Key and the National Party. It’s something I lack almost entirely.

    Like

  9. Farmer Baby Boomer says:

    HP, i do not agree with this sale but accept that the Govt. acted within the law
    I like you question why the farms were not sold off separately. .As you say they could have received more overall.
    Not all sure that 50% share of processing is enough. To my thinking it should be 51% at the very least. Who has the final say in a 50/50 partnership?

    I would like to see the law changed so sale to overseas buyers was not an option. The Swiss don’t allow foreign ownership but I understand they do offer long tern leases to overseas buyers. I would like to see that option investigated

    Like

  10. adamsmith1922 says:

    John Key has not sold the land. The Crafar receivers have, The receivers have a strict legal obligation to obtain the best price possible within the laws relating to land investment. until, if the law is changed then Ministers have to follow the laid down process.There is no point demonising Key.

    Re comment by FBB on Swiss it is interesting that Ngai Tahu have apparently sold a large forestry block near Hanmer Springs to a Swiss family trust.

    Given comments made widely re this sale it is hard to escape a view that much of the comment has to do with the purchaser being Chinese, when little or any concern is shown when Americans, Brits, Dutch, Germnas, Aussies buy farmland and more importantly our companies. Indeed many New Zealanders seem only toopleased to sell out to foreigners as soon as they can. Then we wonder why our economy lagas.

    Like

  11. JC says:

    “The only question I’m left with is why the receivers insisted on selling the operation as a whole rather than offering up individual farms.”

    My guess is the receivers saw these assets as “distressed”, ie, prone to bargain basement prices in a then soft market if sold individually with their accumulated husbandry,
    debt and environmental issues, and pressure to sell to repay debtors. However, a package put to national and overseas corporate investors covers most of these concerns because there’s sufficient money to cover the issues and much less pressure to meet cashflow problems going forwards.

    The Crafer farms were already in a corporate mode because the family saw that model as the most profitable and it presumably made sense to sell them as a package as well.

    JC

    Like

  12. Colin McIntyre says:

    As it is now confirmed that our sucessive Governments are totally incompetent, leaving so many issues for debate,this article may help readers to understand how our country has the problems it has.

    New Element Discovered.

    The CSIRO announced the discovery of a perverse, perplexing atom
    The new element is Governmentium (Gv). It has one neutron, 25 assistant neutrons, 88 deputy neutrons and 198 assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 312.

    These 312 particles are held together by forces called morons, which are surrounded by vast quantities of lefton-like particles called peons.

    Since Governmentium has no electrons or protons, it is inert. However, it can be detected, because it impedes every reaction with which it comes into contact. A tiny amount of Governmentium can cause a reaction normally taking less than a second to take from four days to four years to complete.

    Governmentium has a normal half-life of 3-6 years. It does not decay but instead undergoes a reorganization in which a portion of the assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange places.

    In fact, Governmentium’s mass will actually increase over time, since each reorganization will cause more morons to become neutrons, forming isodopes.

    This characteristic of moron promotion leads some scientists to believe that Governmentium is formed whenever morons reach a critical concentration. This hypothetical quantity is referred to as critical morass.

    When catalysed with money, Governmentium becomes Administratium, an element that radiates just as much energy as Governmentium since it has half as many peons but twice as many morons. All of the money is consumed in the exchange, and no other byproducts are produced.

    ————————————–

    I’d like to credit this. It appears to be a derivative work of David Saum’s Administratium, seemingly adapted and possibly posted at this page New Element Discovered! Let me know if anyone has a more accurate author link and name.

    http://joannenova.com.au/2012/01

    Like

  13. jh says:

    McKenzie’s land policy aimed to uphold the ideal of the small, independent farmer*
    http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/land-ownership/5

    *A New Zealander (for National members)

    Like

  14. jh says:

    The watershed for the outcomes of “economic rationalisation” is whether you perceive the human economy to be a subset of the worlds ecosystem or independent of it. In other words as elites accumulate vast holdings from which ever country they choose and industry flows to the cheapest labour, how will this even out. Is human population dictated by economic demand?

    Like

Leave a comment