If it doesn’t look good on TV it feels worse on the farm

Dear Rosemary,

I hope none of the farmers who are working hard in the wake of the snow, wind and rain which caused so much damage in Southland and South Otago read your column yesterday.

The last thing you need when you’ve had the heartbreaking task of dealing with hundreds, and in some cases thousands, of dead and dying lambs and you’re also losing ewes is to read:

Freezing temperatures and snowfalls are not a new event, yet year after year the timing of the birth of the lambs coincides with treacherous weather, followed by the sickening sight of the corpses of newborn animals being thrown on to the backs of trucks.

You are right that freezing temperatures and snowfalls aren’t new events. But they’re not predictable either. They don’t happen in the same places at the same time year after year and there is no way of knowing in autumn, when you put the rams out, what weather will happen when in spring.

Most Southland farms have good shelter belts.  When it started snowing the ewes moved under the trees but the snow kept coming, then it rained and the ground they were on turned to bog.

We were lambing when the snow struck. The farm got some snow but not enough to do much damage. Had it been a few kilometres further south and east we too would have suffered huge losses. That we didn’t was simply due to good fortune.

What you saw on television wasn’t the result of poor management, it was the result of bad luck caused by an unusually late and severe snow storm followed by rain and wind.

If you don’t believe me, you might believe Bob Kerridge of the SPCA who wrote:

 . . .we need to be careful about criticism when the catastrophe that’s unfolded in Southland and South Otago is at such an extreme level

After all, this was the worst series of storms in at least a generation, with wind chills of minus 10C and more than 100mm of rain, as well as snow drifts such as have not been experienced since the early 1970s. In these circumstances, no amount of preparation could have prevented such huge livestock losses, of a scale which no farmer would wish for in their lifetime.

Moreover, as Federated Farmers has reminded us, many farmers had actually pushed lambing back from late winter into early spring in order to reduce the level of climatic risk, only to experience far worse weather and vastly more difficult conditions at this later point in time.

Lambing isn’t timed for farmers’ convenience.  It is governed by the ewes’ oestrus (heat) and the length of that is influenced by weather, nutrition and age.

Decreasing day length stimulates the ewe’s natural breeding season, with peak oestrus activity from March to May. The average gestation period for sheep is 147 days. If they’re at peak oestrus in autumn they will lamb in spring.

Another factor which governs the timing of lambing is grass growth. Farms require plenty of feed to flush ewes before tupping, to feed them during and after lambing and to feed the lambs after weaning. Spring lambing fits the feed cycle.

You think it’s sickening watching dead lambs on TV, Rosemary? It feels even worse on the farm when you’re out in the paddocks in the cold and wet working with your stock.

You seem to think farmers are heartless. They’re not and it is not just physically but emotionally difficult dealing with what was a once in a generation event. Good farmers care about and for their stock and it takes great strength to cope with the magnitude of losses many have suffered.

Federated Farmers, Rural Women and Rural Support trusts have been calling on every farm in the affected areas, delivering food parcels and checking that everyone is coping. Most are, given the circumstances, but some are struggling and the views you expressed, which have been voiced on talkback and in letters to editors too, do absolutely nothing to help.

Even if you don’t believe that farmers care about their stock, can’t you understand that they’d do everything they could to minimise losses because dead stock don’t earn money?

Now that the crisis of the storm and its aftermath have passed, farmers are adding up their losses in financial terms. They will be substantial and there will be a flow on into rural communities with less work for shearers, contractors, freezing workers . . .

You saw a few moments of horror on TV. Farmers are still dealing with it and they and the wider rural community will be coping with the aftermath long after you’ve tuned to something else.

12 Responses to If it doesn’t look good on TV it feels worse on the farm

  1. Raymond A Francis says:

    Well said
    The ignorance of people unconnected to the land never fails to amaze me

    Like

  2. alex Masterley says:

    Agreed.
    And then there are the letter writers in the Herald who likewise have no idea of farming life.

    Like

  3. Sally says:

    And I understand that there are now suicides that families and communities are having to deal with.

    Like

  4. Charmaine says:

    Well said. It is good to get the perspective of someone who actually works with the stock.

    Rosemary McLeod does writs some good columns but ones like this just undermine her good work. Just wait for the next one where she complains about the price of Lamb.

    Like

  5. Jeff says:

    Having also read Rosemary McLeod’s comment and been sickened by it I wonder if she will favour us with a comment.
    I am sure she will be aware of your post Ele.

    Like

  6. robertguyton says:

    Raymond A Francis said – “The ignorance of people unconnected to the land never fails to amaze me”

    Rosemary McLeod said – “I am not unrealistic about what happens on farms. Both sides of my family were farming people, and I’ve done my share as a child of trailling through paddocks at lambing time and watching animals being slaughtered.”

    Ele said – “You saw a few moments of horror on TV”
    Horror
    On our farms Ele?
    If we saw a ‘few moments’ of horror, are you implying that there are untold hours of horror that we don’t see?
    We only saw a glimpse of a the horror that can be seen in ‘extended version’ on New Zealand farms?
    Ele?

    Like

  7. homepaddock says:

    Yes Robert there were days of snow followed by rain and freezing winds which killed thousands of lambs and ewes. It was horrible but it wasn’t, as you seem to imply, a secret.

    Like

  8. robertguyton says:

    I know Ele, I was there.
    I think Rosemary McLeod is reacting to the realisation that, while a disaster like the one that struck Southland’s sheep and cattle is ‘horrible’, there are other farming practices that are equally horrifying. She talks about inducing and much of her concern is expressed about that.
    If a news item that focused on the dead and dying calves resulting from the practice of induction was aired(gasping per-term calves expiring in a cold, muddy paddock etc. en masse), then Rosemary would doubtless have more to say, as would a great many New Zealanders.
    I’m not making a judgement about these things, just clarifying the issue (I believe).

    Like

  9. homepaddock says:

    Had she stuck to inductions I wouldn’t have commented.

    There’s a big difference between a management practice (which is being phased out and which I’m not condoning) and Southland/South Otago stock losses which were a result of very bad luck not bad management.

    Like

  10. robertguyton says:

    There is.
    What did you think of Sir Henry van der Heyden being busted as an ‘inducer’?

    Like

  11. homepaddock says:

    The busting? Jamie MacKay covered that on the Farming Show and what we saw was edited to give the worst impression.

    Being an inducer? – not a good look but he is phasing it out.

    Like

  12. robertguyton says:

    “Not a good look”

    How many times have we heard that since this Government was elected?
    It’s going to be the mantra it’s remembered for once it’s gone.
    Not a good look indeed!

    Like

Leave a comment