Another endorsement

National has got an endorsement from a former coalition partner :

Dame Tariana Turia says she would rather see funding being given directly to iwi to enable iwi to resource their own health needs.

“Because in all the years that I’ve worked in the health sector, I’ve never seen the change that we needed,” the former politician said.

“I would definitely support whānau, hapū and iwi having their own resource so they get bulk funding to do so much for a population. You know, if you take Rātana for instance, where you’ve got a settled population, then they should be funded to do their own. I mean, nobody knows their people better than themselves.”

When Turia was associate health minister from 1999 to 2004, the Māori health directorate was powerful and He Korowai Oranga – Māori Health Strategy was established, she said.

National’s health spokesman Shane Reti has said a Māori health directorate within the ministry would be strategic and not operational. Iwi-Māori partnership boards would be the regional operational entities.

“Personally, I believe that the money should go as close as possible to the people,” Turia said. “You know, we’ve got to learn to be an authority to ourselves and not for other people, to be having authority over us. And I think it’s really important that our people are really clear about what it is that we need to be doing for ourselves. Or do we always want to be beholden to a government or someone else?”

Labour has a government-knows-best attitude and it’s wrong.

It’s far better to help people to help themselves than to have politicians and bureaucrats deciding what’s best.

Turia believes that more was accomplished for Māori health working with a National government.

“I have to be honest and say that John Key and Bill English were amazing to work with. They didn’t want to manage us, they wanted to know what we wanted for ourselves. I liked the freedom to be. I’ve never liked to be under somebody. They were more lateral thinkers, more believing in people to do for themselves. I really liked them.”

And Turia is happy to see a change in government.

“Labour’s a very interesting animal. You know, it wants to keep everybody in the same boat. And thinks that if they treat everybody the same everything will come out fine. And they don’t take into account the differences in the way people view things. For a party that actually enjoyed the Māori vote for so many years, they learned nothing. All they learned was to try and have more authority over us.” . . 

Labour has spent more and accomplished less.

It has fed the bureaucracy and starved the frontline.

The National-led government faces a health crisis. Solving it won’t be easy but it will have a much greater chance of success if it trusts local people to solve local problems.

4 Responses to Another endorsement

  1. […] Another endorsement […]

    Like

  2. pdm1946 says:

    `Labour has spent more and accomplished less.’

    Has there ever been a Labour Government that has not been able to claim this as their major achievement.

    The time of Sir Roger Douglas possibly excepted.

    Like

  3. Lloyd McIntosh says:

    “Dame Tariana Turia says she would rather see funding being given directly to iwi to enable iwi to resource their own health needs.”
    How exactly would this work? For example, would Maori have exclusive access to a separate health system and be exuded from the alternative public system? Or would Maori be able to cherry pick between the two? In that context it amounts to racially based separatism. In other words, with two parallel systems “by Maori for Maori” would be acceptable whereas “by Pakeha for Pakeha” would be deemed racist or apartheid.
    Statistics show that Maori have poorer outcomes under the present public health system. The question is why? Are Maori denied or have equal treatment delayed because of their race? If that were the case it would be totally unacceptable. Or is it genetic, cultural, financial or opting to live in areas poorly served by the system etc etc. Those are the issues that the statistics don’t identify or explain.
    Whether or not a separate system would resolve those root causes of the problem is debatable.

    Like

Leave a comment