Good use of our money?

Is this good use of our money?

Breakfast is an important meal and hotel breakfasts are expensive so that probably shouldn’t be criticised but the snacks can be.

MIQ wouldn’t be much fun and I can understand someone wanting some comfort food, but should taxpayers be paying for it?

Try telling someone who doesn’t have enough money to feed their family that their tax helps fund $60 of ministerial snacks.

Parliamentary Services obviously thinks that everything but the deodorant is okay, but if you’re on a ministerial salary wouldn’t you realise this isn’t a good look and pay for it yourself?

2 Responses to Good use of our money?

  1. IainH says:

    Actually it isneven worse than you paint as snacks are also supplied in MIQ.
    I cancelled all desserts, snacks and soft drinks when in MIQ as the calories supplied was overkill.

    Like

  2. pdm1946 says:

    `Try telling someone who doesn’t have enough money to feed their family that their tax helps fund $60 of ministerial snacks.’

    Not to mention deodorant.

    Like

Leave a comment