He would say that wouldn’t he

Andrew Little denied any conflict of interest between his roles as Labour Party president and General Secretary of the EPMU when he was interviewed on Q & A  this morning.

Well he would wouldn’t he?

If I was a member of Labour Party I’d probably be quite happy to have the voluntary wing led by someone who’d bring the money and mebership of a large union with him.

But if I was in the EPMU I would have concerns about how much of his time Little was devoting to his union duties and that there might be times that the best interests of the union might be different from those of the party.

Little was interviewed by Paul Holmes. The other feature interview on Q&A  was Guyon Espiner with John Key.

I hadn’t realise that the programme was on this morning so have jsut watched the interviews on line, but Kiwiblog,  thought it was pretty good overall while the Home Office  misses Agenda and Frogblog said it was visually and aurally obnoxious.

Did you see the one about . . .

A new study has revealed that if you don’t eat you’ll eventually die at Laughy Kate.

Fonterra Blues at Quote Unquote.

Drug companies vs doctors at the Visible Hand in Economics.

Only Turn Left at Watching Brief.

On the dismal science at Anti-Dismal.

I think I get it now from The NZ Home Office  (a new blog which has joined my list of regular reads).

The teacher robot at Lolly Scramble.

The reinstatement of titular land titles at Pundit.