The Electoral Commission is investigating an advertisement exhorting people to vote for New Zealand First.
It’s not hard to join the dots between tax breaks for fast horses and racing interests who back New Zealand First.
. . . Winston Peters has repaid the electoral support of the racing industry with changes to the bloodstock tax rules and plans for an all-weather track.
Peters announced $4.8m for tax deductions towards the cost of breeding high quality horses, in Thursday’s budget. The change would encourage new investment in the breeding industry, he said, enhancing the country’s racing stock and making it a more financially attractive industry. . .
NZ First has not disclosed its party donors in the annual declarations to the Electoral Commission, this month, but Peters did have outspoken support at last year’s election from the Waikato thoroughbred and bloodstock industry. . .
Industry leaders were vocal in their support of NZ First, with thoroughbred breeders Sir Patrick and Lady Hogan taking out a full-page advertisement in industry newspaper The Informant to encourage racing participants to party vote NZ First in September last year. . . .
It is permissible for people or groups to advertise in support of a party but Andrew Geddis raises some questions about this advertisement:
The advertisement definitely encouraged people to vote for New Zealand First. It was here on Sunday but if you click that link now you’ll get access denied. However it is in the link to the story at Stuff above and says:
There is only one horse to back, it’s New Zealand First. It has the race record. It’s now imperative that you all take this opportunity to have what we want by making our PARTY VOTE IN FAVOUR OF NEW ZEALAND FIRST.. .
And under the signatures it says:
PLACE YOUR PARTY VOTE FOR NEW ZEALAND FRIST
It’s possible the Hogans and the industry magazine didn’t know the electoral law about third party promotion but ignorance isn’t a defence.
Although, like far too many instances when questions are raised about possible breaches of electoral law, the investigation is far too late, this horse has well and truly bolted.
Months after the election is far too late so whether or not there has been a breach of electoral law, this yet again raises questions about the effectiveness of the law.
However, it’s not too late to address any conflict the issue of Peters as Racing Minister.
David Farrar points out:
Jacinda Ardern said NZ First Ministers can’t be Minister of Fisheries due to their donations from the fishing industry. Yet she makes Winston Minister of Racing despite figures in the racing industry running advertisements campaigning for NZ First. . .
If NZ First MPs can’t be Ministers of Fisheries because of donations from the fishing industry, this advertisement should disqualify Peters from being Racing Minister.