A good news story of a wedding under lockdown has highlighted the confusion and contradictions over what is an isn’t essential:
A furore has erupted among the country’s wedding celebrants after a North Shore couple were allowed to tie the knot at their home despite the nationwide lockdown.
Jeff Montgomery, the Registrar-General for Births, Deaths and Marriages, is standing by his decision to let the couple go ahead with their special day, sending an email to all celebrants today stating it is up to them and their clients if they decide to get married during the 4-week lockdown period. . .
But the Registrar-General emailed celebrants later saying it wasn’t up to him to decide if weddings should go ahead or not.
“Weddings have occurred recently, for example when one of the couple is about to pass away, or because of religious requirements.
“It is up to the couple and the celebrant to consider how essential the wedding is and to work within the level 4 rules”.
“It is not the role of the Registrar-General to make decisions about whether or not a ceremony occurs. ‘Permission’ or ‘exemptions’ are not something that I have authority to issue and I do not make judgments on what services may or may not be essential.
“My role is to issue licences where the couple meet the requirements, to register celebrants who are expected to abide by the law, and to register relationships that have been legally solemnised,” he wrote.
That’s quite clear, so who can make decisions about whether or not a ceremony occurs?
In today’s briefing with media, Director-General of Health Ashley Bloomfield said weddings could go ahead as long as they abided by social distancing rules.
That seems clear, but what does the Covid-19 website say?
All indoor and outdoor events cannot proceed.
This does not include workplaces of people undertaking essential businesses.
If a wedding celebrant was running an essential business that might be okay but:
These requirements apply to family and social gatherings such as birthdays, funerals, tangi or weddings. These gatherings can not go ahead.
We are asking you only spend time with those who you are in self-isolation with, and keep your distance from all others at all times.
So there we have it – the Registrar-General quite rightly says it’s not up to him to say if a wedding is essential.
The DG of Health says weddings could take place as long as people obeyed social distancing rules.
But the COvid-19 website says weddings can’t take place.
The confusion and contradictions over this provide more grounds for having the guiding rule for what can take place under Level 4 lockdown what’s safe rather than what’s essential.
Providing everyone involved took the proper precautions to maintain social distance and either wash their hands or use sanitiser before and after touching the pen and paper work, it ought to be safe to have a wedding with just the couple, two witnesses who were already in their bubble and a celebrant.
But under the Level 4 rules no weddings are supposed to be taking place.
Changing to safety as the guide rather than essential would not only allow very small wedding ceremonies to take place, it would allow a lot more small businesses to open again.
That could save jobs, and businesses, take pressure over businesses like supermarkets that are open, and get rid of the confusion and contradictions over what is and isn’t essential.