Liberation has more on the dotbomb issue here.
He starts with the conflict between Thompson’s involvement while working for Scoop and the problem with it signing up a domain name for the new party.
He then goes on to the party itself:
And what of Dotcom’s political party ? Assuming that it does eventuate – and this column will report on it fully once it becomes certain that the Internet Party does not disintegrate before launch – such a party has made a change of government its declared aim. To that extent, Dotcom has the potential to split the existing anti-Key, centre left vote – in much the same way that Ralph Nader did in the 2000 US election – without either winning an electorate or crossing the 5% barrier, nationwide. If so, a significant share of the centre left vote would be wasted. No doubt, Dotcom has foreseen that risk. One can only assume that he believes he can attract large numbers of new voters – most of them young, some of them in south Auckland.
To that extent, Dotcom’s efforts could arguably run in parallel with Labour’s announced plans to mobilise that pool of 800,000 non-voters nationwide, many of them resident in south Auckland. Dotcom certainly has the resources and contacts to wheel in hip hop /EDM artists who would get the attention of young voters way beyond the capacity of Labour and the Greens. Whether he can transform a dance party into a political party still seems a big call however, especially given the need to reach a 5% threshold. Much rests on pure faith that new high calibre political activists would somehow magically emerge out of the woodwork.
Moreover, the party name and scant details released to date suggest that Dotcom intends to focus almost exclusively upon Internet freedoms. In doing so, he seems willing to outsource the boring old political stuff – you know, like having a credible health policy or economic policy – to Labour and the Greens. If so, he cannot hope to have much pull with the libertarian, National leaning voters who might share his zeal for Internet freedom.
Because so much of the Internet Party looks like a toy and vanity project for Dotcom, the likelihood is that such a party will function – at best – as only a voter recruitment vehicle that by mid year, will have lost its ability to amuse Dotcom. Especially if and when the polls are indicating by then that the Internet Party hasn’t a hope of (a) winning a seat or (b) reaching the 5% mark that would make its “kingmaker” role anything more than delusionary. At which point, Dotcom may think that he can throw his imagined legions behind Labour or the Greens. If that’s Plan B, he’s dreaming. The likelihood is that the only lesson that Dotcom will have given to the kids of south Auckland is the one that they’ve already sussed out : never trust a politician. It is distressing to think that Al Thompson may have thrown away so much, for so little.
Liberation has a collection of tweets on the issue, which doesn’t, yet, include this one:
Someone should channel the wonderful Darryl Kerrigan and tell Dotcome he’s dremini’.
He has has money but anyone with a passing knowledge of political history knows it takes a lot more than money to win electorate seats and/or 5% of the party vote.
There are already several vehicles for those who wish to vote against the government. If Dotcom’s vanity one manages to dent any, it will be those others, not National.
Tantrums can be entertaining for observers, but they’re rarely amusing for the victims, especially if they’re being defamed.
You would think someone aspiring to be in government might have learned something from the Supreme Court’s granting Erin Leigh’s appeal to sue a former public servant who provided Trevor Mallard with information with which he attacked Leigh in parliament.
But no, Mallard is now besmirching the reputations of several other innocent people in a misguided and unfounded attack on Bill English.
I’m not going to dignify it with a link you’ll find more than enough about what he’s done on the following blogs:
Over at Keeping Stock, Inventory 2 asks what’s upsetting Trevor?
Whaleoil uses it for yet another post on how Labour isn’t focussing on what matters.
Matthew Hooton, one of the people maligned by Mallard, entitles his response Mallard goes mad.
Mallard’s post not only attacks these people it hurts his party and its members, which is what I assume has motivated a brief post entitled Please at Imperator Fish.
The public tantrum is stupid for many reasons including the fact that the daily political round-up at Liberation which prompted it, covers a range of views and clearly states who sponsors it.
Any link between one of them and the Finance Minister is drawing a bow so long the archer has directed the arrow to his own foot.
Update: Dim Post has some advice for Mallard in Deep thought punching your weight edition.
Update 2: Kiwiblog reckons Trevor has joined the truthers and birthers.
Liberation has a politico’s guide to who to support in the Rugby World Cup.
I prefer to keep politics out of sport and base my ranking on emotion:
1 – All Blacks – patriotism and parochialism (Richie McCaw grew up in the Haka Valley).
2 – Argentina – emotional attachment to the country and its people.
3 – Scotland – tartan genes.
4 – Canada – lovely people and like us they’re shadowed by a bigger neighbour.
5 – Australia (as long as they’re not playing us) – neighbours, home of brother, sister-in-law and three nieces.
6 – Italy – delicious food and wine.
7 – Tonga – supporters’ passion deserves support.
8. -Fiji – lovely people, pity about the politics.
9 – Samoa – neighbours.
10 = – Ireland & Wales – close to Scotland, celtic.
12 – USA – spent most of July there and loved the positivity of the people.
13 – Japan- they’re a bit shaken up too.
14 – England – sister-in-law’s home country.
15 – Romania – homeland of friends.
16 = Georgia, Namibia, Russia – they’re unlikely to beat us.
19 – France – lovely people and food but they went more than far enough in the last RWC.
20 – South Africa – they’ve won more than enough times.
New Zealand and Uruguay as sporting equivalents – Pablo at Kiwipolitico compares one small country where sport and agriculture are important with another.
Don’t admit them to hospital then – Macdoctor on the smoking ban for prisoners.
Star the second – In A Strange Land has a star chart to help her stay dry for July.
What makes us happy? Rivetting Kate Taylor on what really matters.
Sparks in the universe – Stellar Cafe on the bright ideas that get away from you.
What determines productivity? – Anti-Dismal on attemts toa nswer the big question.
Biology isn’t destiny but it affects your saving throws – Offsetting Behaviour on nature vs nurutre.
Trio – Quote Unquote on tree planting and muttering and purring.
Mines railways or jobs – Liberty Scott on unintended consequences.
Happy Birthday to us – Gooner at No Minister on the blog’s third birthday.
TraeMe hints – Oswald Bastable knows something but he’s not telling much.
Farewell to the Independent – Liberation bids the paper goodbye with a parody of Chirs Trotter’s writing.
The very worthy winner of the Air NZ Best Blog Award is: Cactus Kate.
Cactus Kate (http://asianinvasion2006.blogspot.com) has won the New Zealand Bloggers’ Union’s inaugural Air New Zealand** Best Blog Award Dim Post .http://dimpost.wordpress.com) was runner up and No Right Turn (http://norightturn.blogspot.com) and Whaleoil (http://whaleoil.gotcha.co.nz) were awarded joint third place.http://hot-topic.co.nz); In A Strange Land (http://inastrangeland.wordpress.com); Kiwianarama (http://www.kiwianarama.co.nz); Liberation (http://liberation.typepad.com); and Not PC (http://pc.blogspot.com).
The union launched the awards after another media awards competition, sponsored by a foreign budget airline that uses decrepit Boeing 767s for its Trans-Tasman services and doesn’t even have proper lie-flat beds in Business Class, failed to follow its own criteria in selecting its short list. . . .
. . . In awarding the Supreme Award to Cactus Kate, the judges described the blog as: “Intelligent, persuasive and influential, with the sort of investigative journalism Metro should be publishing. This is a blog which has contributed to changes in the administration of some of New Zealand’s most important regulatory bodies, as well as providing a healthy degree of humour.”
In awarding the Runner Up Award to Dim Post, the judges described the blog as: “Genuinely world-class political satire on matters both weighty and absurd, delivered almost every day. While clearly demonstrating a centre-left perspective, the writer also has the ability to surprise with unpredictable ideas.”
The judges said they struggled most with the choice between No Right Turn and Whaleoil for third place.
Commenting on Whaleoil, the judges said: “While the writer’s vitriol can be distasteful and his spelling and grammar sometimes leaves much to be desired, Whaleoil is the ultimate right wing blogger, delivering scorching critiques of current issues every day, and undoubtedly influencing real political events.”
Commenting on No Right Turn, the judges said: “While there is some doubt about the degree to which the blog has influenced real events and the lack of a comments option could be seen as against the spirit of blogging, No Right Turn provides extremely well researched and well-written contributions – with a decent dose of hard-left anger – on a very wide range of political, social, constitutional and human rights issues.”
The judges recommended that Whaleoil consider investing in a more advanced spell and grammar check program and that No Right Turn consider opening up his site to community discussion.
Congratulations to the winners, placegetters and NZ Bloggers Union which took the suggestion of better blog awards and made it happen, with panache and humour.
And well done Air NZ on not being upset by having its name and CEO associated with the wards without their knowledge.
The judges comments on all 30 nominees are worth a read too in spite of – or some might say because of – the comments about this blog.