Duncan Garner has the line of the day on the AM Show – he’s calling Labour the Sweatshop Boys.
He’s referring to the party’s botched intern scheme :
There are calls for Immigration NZ to investigate a Labour-linked election campaign which used unpaid labour in the guise of an education programme.
More than 80 overseas students have been doing unpaid “drudge work”, and living in a cramped Auckland marae without a working shower, reports political blog Politik. . .
Rivals ACT called the campaign a “sweat shop filled with immigrant labour”.
“I cannot believe the Labour Party’s do as we say, not as we do attitude. This is a new low for hypocrisy, even for them,” ACT leader David Seymour said.
“Who would believe in Labour’s promised crackdown on cheap student labour when Labour are one of the worst offenders in the country?” . . .
That is hypocrisy writ large.
National Party campaign chairman Steven Joyce said Labour had to explain how it could justify “exploiting” international students for its election campaign while it was also speaking out against international education providers.
“This is truly appalling behaviour both for its lack of human decency and industrial strength hypocrisy,” Joyce said.
“If the allegations are correct, Labour has brought international students to New Zealand on false pretences, failed to look after them, and failed to meet their obligations to the students in the most basic way, while at the same time campaigning against exploitation of migrants.” . . .
Employers are very, very worried about Labour’s threatened changes to immigration.
Skills shortage in many sectors including IT, trades, farming, contracting and hospitality mean employers are already struggling to get anyone to fill positions. They’re wasting time, money and energy working their way through the process of employing immigrants.
Labour’s threatened changes would make that much, much worse.
These employers are working hard making a significant and positive economic and social contribution to New Zealand.
Labour wants to hobble them and yet has the hypocrisy to bring in people from overseas, not to work in productive businesses, but to campaign for the party, and do it without pay.
Compounding that, the party that is supposed to stand up for workers put them up in sub-standard accommodation.
Matt McCarten did a mea culpe yesterday but the party can’t blame the mess only on him.
Newshub has obtained internal documents outlining Labour’s ambitious plans to put foreign students to work on its campaign.
The plan shows the party needed to find $270,000 in funding to pull it off and was banking on unions to fund a lot of it. . .
The budgeting was based on 100 students staying for an average of eight weeks. The cost of feeding and housing them in motorhomes was estimated at $240,000, with an operational budget of $30,000 for petrol, venues and AT HOP cards.
The documents show First and Unite unions agreed to contribute $100,000, “white collar unions” – likely the likes of the PSA – committed to $50,000, while Union Trust put up a start-up loan of $25,000.
The plan was to get E tū and “other appropriate unions” on board too.
The Council of Trade Unions was also to be involved in management of the project, and while Labour has been distancing itself from the project, the documents explicitly states: “The programme and certification is the responsibility of Labour.” . . .
Hypocrisy is bad enough, but there are also questions over which visas the students are on.
. . . We know these “fellows” are being given free accommodation in exchange for their work, so they are in breach of their visitor visa conditions, if they have visitor visas.
It is possible they have other visas, such as work visas. But it is hard to imagine they could qualify for work visas, and the hypocrisy would be great – Labour bringing in unpaid fellows on work visas, while campaigning against such work visas.
So it looks like either Labour has arranged 85 work visas for its unpaid fellows while campaigning to reduce the number of work visas for unskilled jobs or Labour has been complicit in a huge case of immigration fraud.
Even if the students are on working holiday visas, there are other questions:
Immigration Minister Michael Woodhouse did not know whether Immigration NZ or MBIE’s labour inspectorate was investigating the issue, but believed Labour had serious questions to answer about possible breaches.
Woodhouse said the students would be allowed to undertake the work if they were on working holiday visas, as Labour believed, but there were still questions about whether there had been breaches of employment law.
“What I am aware of is similar schemes to this have been investigated very seriously by the labour inspectorate because it is work masquerading as voluntary work, and I think that is also a question that should be asked of the Labour Party.”
Providing services for food and board counted as work under employment law, he said.
“Regardless of what visa they’re on, there are certainly questions about the nature of the work they’re doing and whether that meets the definition of employment.” . .
The Sweatshop boys and girls in Labour will be sweating over this.
Even if there is no immigration fraud, what they are doing is in direct contradiction of their immigration policy and their supposed role in protecting workers from exploitation.