The Prime Minister’s Business Advisory Council has a strong message for the government: infrastructure is at a crisis point.
Fran O’Sullivan writes:
The warning came in a June 26 letter to Ardern — released to this columnist — where the council said New Zealand lacks a “national masterplan” to tangibly map out “our immediate, medium and long-term infrastructure future in an integrated way”.
The Business Advisory Council, chaired by Air New Zealand chief executive Christopher Luxon, has presented a damning indictment of New Zealand’s infrastructure regime saying there is “no overarching vision or leadership in New Zealand for infrastructure development”.
“This means there is no nation-building narrative upon which to build a strategic direction,” it says — although it excuses the Ardern Government of any culpability for the mess which it says is intergenerational.
Apart from a national masterplan — which is heavily redolent of the Singapore Government approach to infrastructure development favoured by some council members — it wants to see funding and financing mechanisms that would allow for long-term, debt-funded or investable opportunities. It notes the incentives between central and local government are misaligned and New Zealand is poor at execution and delivery.
“The public sector does not have the capability to manage a programme of projects of national significance and the private sector operates in a boom-bust cycle,” the letter warns. . .
This government made much about its wellbeing budget but is ignoring the part infrastructure plays in that:
The council’s letter says that Infrastructure, in its broadest sense, underpins wellbeing.
“The success of regions relies upon their effective connectivity to urban centres; linking the city fringe with the centre can reduce income inequality; mature, unclogged and functioning cities (especially Auckland) are our critical engines of growth; swimmable beaches rely on major storm water and sewerage projects; energy certainty is a basic building block for investment; larger bridges can enable higher loadings, fewer truck movements and lower emissions; broadband connectivity empowers business to occur anywhere, any time; and a connected vision for infrastructure enables wealth to flow into and around the country, building an equality of opportunity for all Kiwis.”
The government scrapped several reading projects which would have improved travel times, safety, and productivity.
They would have been roads that led to improved wellbeing.
It then added insult to injury by increasing fuel taxes to fund trains and cycleways.
“Unfortunately, the system that sits beneath effective and sustainable infrastructure development in our country is fundamentally broken.” . .
Improved infrastructure shouldn’t be a partisan issue but this is an anti-roads, anti-cars government.
Walkways, cycleways, buses and trains all have a role to play but they can’t replace safe and efficient roads.
The government doesn’t appear to realise that improved infrastructure Is an important component of sustainability, bringing economic, environmental and social benefits.
Its transport blind spot stops it seeing that poor infrastructure is a roadblock on the journey to wellbeing.