Stories from migrants to the Waitaki District:
Stories from migrants to the Waitaki District:
Immigration NZ registered a surge in website visits on Sunday, the day after the Australian election.
More than 11,500 people logged onto the Immigration New Zealand website and its information site New Zealand Now on Sunday, compared to fewer than 2500 the previous Sunday.
Google analytics also showed a spike in Australians searching the words ‘moving to New Zealand’, particularly those from Queensland.
The true level of interest in emigrating is difficult to gauge as Australian citizens do not need a visa to travel to New Zealand, although its visa-holders do.
The number who started the visa process, through registrations of interest, jumped from 20 to 715. . .
We don’t, and shouldn’t, discriminate on political views.
If we did, would we want more people who appear to be upset they’ve got a government that priorirised economic management, lower taxes and a more moderate approach to climate change than the opposition which proposed the opposite?
A big shakeup could be coming for New Zealand’s immigration policy.
Many of the proposed changes are sensible and will lead to a simplification of the immigration system, but there is also concern that while the system might be easier to understand, it will be harder, longer and more costly to employ workers from overseas.
Under the proposals, every employer who wishes to employ a migrant must become an accredited employer. In theory, this is good migrants deserve to come to New Zealand to an employer who treats them well and complies with New Zealand employment law. . .
NZ co-ops have been getting a bad media rap lately. Take Fonterra, for example. Andrea Fox, one of the country’s best-informed journalists specialising in agriculture issues, started a new series in the NZ Herald with the headline: “Fonterra: Disappointment and soured dairy dreams”.
Noting the dairy goliath had a silver-spoon birth nearly 18 years ago she wrote:
“Today the co-operative is looking a bit like the family’s overweight, lazy teenager hogging the remote on the biggest couch in the room And the credit card bills are coming in”.
After Fonterra posted a historic first net loss of $196m, Fox says calls are heating up for the company to be split up and a company, perhaps listed, spun off it, open to outside capital investment to chase high-value product markets. One of the country’s investment gurus, Brian Gaynor, says even major shareholders are telling him it’s time for change. . .
Uncertainty swirls over Mackenzie dairy plan – David Williams:
The legal battle over a large dairy farm planned for the Mackenzie Basin is heading to the High Court. David Williams reports.
The future of the Mackenzie Basin’s Simons Pass Station – a lightning rod for national environmental opposition – remains as unclear as a swirling effluent pond.
Dunedin businessman Murray Valentine has spent 16 years and millions of dollars gathering approvals, court settlements, and building infrastructure for a $100-million-plus dairy development at Simons Pass, near Lake Pukaki. Valentine told Newsroom last year he plans to irrigate 4500 hectares at the property – some of which is Crown lease land – and stock more than 15,000 animals, including 5500 cows. (The average herd size in New Zealand is 431 cows. The national herd is five million milking cows.)
As of late last year, 840 cows were being milked and Valentine says the development is about a quarter finished. . .
Confident sheep and beef farmers are paying top money and have out-bid foresters for land on the North Island’s East Coast. In the South Island apple harvesting’s almost finished in the Nelson Motueka region.
Kaitaia, in Northland’s north, needs a good dose of rain – the five or six millimetres at the weekend didn’t help much. Where there are wet spots in paddocks new grass is germinating well.
Around Pukekohe it’s been quiet in market gardens because of the school holidays and the working week being interrupted by statutory holidays. Many staff have taken time off. It’s been warmer this week than last and Monday’s 15mm of rainfall has been enough for most crops. . .
Seven of New Zealand’s best and brightest will vie for the title of Young Vegetable Grower of the Year in a competition in Pukekohe next Friday, 10 May.
The victor will be crowned Young Vegetable Grower of the Year, and move on to the Young Grower national final, to be held in Tauranga in October. There, they will join the winners of the Bay of Plenty, Central Otago, Hawke’s Bay, Nelson, and Gisborne regional fruit-grower events, to compete for the national title of Young Grower of the Year 2019.
Contestants will demonstrate their knowledge and skills around topics vital to the management of a successful horticulture business, including tractor proficiency, sales and marketing, and health and safety. The winner will be decided at an awards dinner on Friday night, where they will speak to an audience from throughout the industry about growing in a climate of change. . .
Stuart Varney is proud to be a farmer the Fox business star sees a Chinese trade deal coming soon – Betsy Freese:
Stuart Varney has a top-rated market program on television, but he is happiest when he is working on his 1,100-acre tree farm in upstate New York. The host of Varney & Co., weekdays 9 a.m. to noon EDT on FOX Business, is in the midst of his first timber harvest this spring. Born and raised in the U.K., Varney, 70, helped Ted Turner launch CNN in 1980. He became an American citizen in 2015. I caught up with Varney to talk about agriculture, trade deals, and the media.
SF: Tell me about your farm.
SV: It’s lovely rolling hills and forests, a delightful piece of land. It reminds me of my native England. I bought it 18 years ago because I wanted a big piece of land within a reasonable drive of my home in New Jersey. In England, the idea of owning 1,000 acres, or even 100 acres, is out of the question unless you are a billionaire. But in America, you can do it. We found this property for a reasonable price. It was my piece of America. I fell in love with it. The idea of creating a tree farm came later. I didn’t know anything about logging and didn’t buy it for that purpose, but we hired a forester and he created a plan. Our first harvest is this year. We will harvest 1,088 trees. . .
An online petition is pushing for a firefighter fighting the Nelson blaze to be spared deportation.
The petition ‘Stop the Deportation of Steve Webster from NZ’ was set up on Change.org yesterday by friend and former volunteer firefighter Ken Mahon.
Mahon said he began the online petition at 3pm yesterday – without telling Webster – after he saw new social media photo of Webster all dirty from fighting the Tasman fires and decided he had to do something. . .
Steve and Gail Webster moved to Nelson from the United Kingdom in 2012 with their two teenage daughters.
As well as being a volunteer firefighter, the couple own Earthbloom Flower Shop in Nelson and Steve is a car salesman.
In 2016 the Nelson Weekly reported the family had their bid for permanent residency turned down in early April that year. They were told they had to be out of the country by midnight on Friday May 20.
Just 48 hours before that deadline, Steve received an email at midnight on Wednesday saying they had been given a 12-month essential skills work visa, Nelson Weekly reported.
However, Mahon said the family had again landed themselves in a fight against immigration after they had been given until June this year to leave the country.
“They have worked very hard at getting their business up and running but unfortunately it hasn’t met the requirements by immigration in the timeframe,” he said.
“It is a bit rough really. They give a lot to the community, have a lot of support out there, and are well liked.
“It is just not fair. Why does this always happen to the good people in life?”
Aucklanders have rallied to support another business person facing deportation:
The community is fighting to save the family of seven from being sent overseas. Credits: Newshub.
Hundreds of people have rallied in Auckland on Sunday in support of a Ukrainian family facing deportation.
Nataliya Shchetkova and her family thought New Zealand would be their home forever.
After they arrived here six years ago, they bought La Vista, a popular restaurant in Auckland’s St Helier. They now employ 17 full-time staff – up from nine when they bought it.
But Immigration NZ says the business does not add enough benefit to New Zealand by creating sustained and on-going employment over and above the existing level of employment.
The family of seven have been denied residency and told they should start planning to leave by July 1 – including selling their restaurant if necessary. . .
She has almost doubled the staff employed and that’s still not enough?
These two cases are particularly troubling when only after political and public pressure did Immigration Minister Ian Lees-Galloway reverse his decision to give residency to a convicted criminal.
If immigration criteria doesn’t allow families like the Websters and Shchetkovas who are making positive contributions in business and the community to stay then the criteria is wrong and must change.
National is generally supportive of immigration, but not without limits:
National would pull New Zealand out of the UN’s Global Compact on Migration because of its potential to restrict New Zealand’s ability to set its own migration and foreign policy, National Leader Simon Bridges says.
“National is supportive of global action on major issues and of migration into New Zealand because it brings skills, capital and connections and makes New Zealand a better, more diverse place. And we support the ability for New Zealanders to travel and live and work overseas should they choose.
“But immigration policy is solely a matter for individual countries and must take account of their individual circumstances – and New Zealand’s policies are already held up as international best practice. There is no automatic right to migrate to another country without that country’s full agreement, a view which the United Nation’s Global Compact on Migration, set to be signed next week, seeks to counter.
Immigration is generally positive but not without limits.
“While not binding, the Compact could restrict the ability of future governments to set immigration and foreign policy, and to decide on which migrants are welcome and which aren’t. While National is the party most open to immigration, we cannot accept this.
A government must have the right to say which and how many immigrants cross its borders.
Any restriction on that is a restriction on a country’s sovereignty.
”This Government’s own immigration policy is weak and confused, including its unfulfilled campaign promises to slash immigration. Signing up to this only clouds things further – like its working groups the Government appears to be relying on the UN to set its migration policy rather than making its own decisions.
“While a number of countries are pulling out of the agreement as the extent of its potential impact on the decision-making of individual countries is realised, our Government is refusing to outline its own position.
“For these reasons, National will not be supporting this agreement and we will reverse the decision if this Government signs up to it.”
The government has yet to decide whether or not it will sign up to the compact.
Several countries including Australia, the USA, Hungary, Austria Poland and Switzerland have declined support.
Immigration Minister Ian Lees-Galloway has changed his mind about Karel Sroubek:
Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway has reversed his decision to grant conviction drug smuggler Karel Sroubek residency.
An Immigration New Zealand (INZ) probe into the drug smuggler found he was liable for deportation on grounds not previously considered. These included Czech convictions under his real name.
“He is being removed because he never had a visa in the first place.”
Lees-Galloway said public trust and confidence had been damaged and he took responsibility for it and for fixing it. He apologised to the prime minister but did not offer his resignation. . .
The Minister is responsible for the damage to public trust and confidence in both the system and him.
How on earth he could have given residency to anyone who had been convicted of crimes when so many worthy, law abiding would-be residents are turned down defies logic.
A decision to deport a convicted criminal could be made in a very few minutes.
A decision to give residency to one needs a lot more time than it got:
Immigration Minister Iain Lees-Galloway made the decision to grant Karel Sroubek residency in less than an hour.
The revelation has led to calls from the Opposition for Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern to sack her Immigration Minister.
Lees-Galloway said he did not read the full file on the Czech drug smuggler, and instead “read the aspects of the file that I thought were necessary to make the decision that I made”. . .
How can you know what you need to read to make a decision if you don’t read all the information you have?
“I took the information that I had and I took the time that I felt was necessary. I read various aspects of the full file. I didn’t rely solely on the summary.” . .
Various aspects? That’s not the full file and it defies belief that he could have read even some of the information that has made this decision so inexplicable and granted residency.
National Leader Simon Bridges has renewed his call for the Prime Minister to sack Lees-Galloway over the “careless decision” after Lees-Galloway claimed he carefully considered all the relevant information.
He allowed a drug dealing gang associate to remain in New Zealand without reading all the information available to him, Bridges said.
“Either Lees-Galloway has misled the Prime Minister or she’s misled New Zealanders.
“The Prime Minister has defended that decision for the past two weeks, telling New Zealanders it was a ‘difficult decision’ but that she had been assured by Lees-Galloway he had given it ‘careful consideration’.
“We now know he hadn’t.”
An hour was not careful consideration of what was a dangerous decision and it was not acceptable due diligence from a senior Cabinet Minister, he said.
“Lees-Galloway’s credibility is now shot. The Prime Minister cannot expect the public to have confidence in any of his decisions given his careless approach to Sroubek’s residency.
“The Prime Minister now has no choice but to sack Lees-Galloway from Cabinet immediately.”
Woodhouse said Lees-Galloway had arrogantly refused to reveal the evidence upon which he made his decision, saying it was not in the public interest.
“He insisted it was a complicated decision not taken lightly.
“The Prime Minister even went as far as saying Lees-Galloway ‘shared with me the careful consideration that he gave this case… it was clearly a very difficult decision’. Only clearly it wasn’t,” Woodhouse said.
The evidence was now overwhelming that Lees-Galloway didn’t do his job, he said.
“It is now clear he made that call without asking questions and without proper consideration of the facts or the track record of the convicted criminal he was allowing to stay. Sroubek needs to go and Lees-Galloway does too.” . .
To have read all the relevant information and made that decision indicates gross incompetence or something conspiracy theorists would delight in.