Remember the media coverage of the Groundswell initiated protests?
The protests attracted big numbers and almost all the signs were, as the organisers requested, on message and polite but the media managed to find a few that weren’t and gave them the focus.
Spot the difference in the coverage of last week’s protest which contrary to its climate focus name was a sort of omnibus protest of the left’s latest causes.
Did you see any of these signs in the mainstream media? (You will have to click on each one to read it properly) :
Why did a very few rude and/or anti-Ardern signs among the mostly polite Groundswell protesters get coverage when several like this among last week’s protest did not?
Could it be that the former weren’t singing from the left’s song book and the latter were?
If so, the treatment of the signs looks very like signs of media bias.

I was in Invercargill on the day of this rent a crowd event.
The numbers were interesting
Thousands in Auckland
Several hundred in Wellington
Hundreds in Christchurch
Dozens in Dunedin
12 in Invercargill
The South is not quite bought into the narrative and residents in Invercargill wouldn’t mind a bit of global warming, in fact bring it!!
LikeLike
I actually can’t be bothered any longer to just point at the MSM and cry “bias”, with this evidence.
Now, I just point up the evidence and say “This is why you have to be destroyed” – or more to the point, “This is why you’re destroying yourselves and YAY”.
So when DPF put up his post the other day, The Trust in News Crisis, this is part of what I said:
Die MSM, Die.
LikeLike
And main stream media/TV News folk wonder why there jobs are in peril?
LikeLike
How about “their” jobs are in peril?
LikeLiked by 2 people
[…] Signs of bias […]
LikeLike