All essential, many safe

What’s an essential business?

The issue of which businesses are and aren’t essential during Auckland’s COVID-19 alert level 4 lockdown has some frustrated and disheartened as their finances continue to dwindle.

If all goes well and COVID-19 case numbers continue to drop, the Government has announced Auckland could move to level 3 as early as Tuesday.

Until then non-essential businesses around the city are sitting tight and waiting for the storm to pass.

But the question of what constitutes an essential business is increasingly a grey area. Why, for example, can people get a box of donuts and a bottle of gin delivered to their house but not a book or a bunch of flowers? . . 

Any business is essential to the people whose livelihoods depend on it but the government and its bureaucrats base their definition on what looks like arbitrary criteria.

Confectionary manufacturing is regarded as essential, butchers aren’t.

I’ve got a whole mouth full of sweet teeth but am yet to be convinced that lollies are essential.

Nor do I have any difficulty arguing that butchers ought to be considered essential, not just to take pressure off supermarkets but for animal welfare reasons. Butchers kill pigs and if these animals aren’t dispatched as regularly scheduled piggeries will run out of space and possibly food as piglets keep coming and growing.

The more people who are at and going to and from work, the greater the potential for Covid-19 to spread, but the disease is not the only threat.

The longer most businesses are forced to stay closed, the greater the risk to their survival and the financial and emotional wellbeing of their owners and staff; and the the cost to the wider economy.

It’s not just businesses, but most hospital services that aren’t deemed essential:

A cancer patient’s accused the Government of playing with peoples’ lives, as more than 37,000 surgeries are cancelled due to the COVID-19 outbreak. . . 

Cancer Society medical director Kate Gregory said: “If the health services were better resourced we would have more flexibility and perhaps things would be more easier.” . . 

Then there’s the toll on mental health.

Suicide attempts in 10-14 year-olds doubled after last year’s lockdowns.

A study of Ministry of Health data has shown that Covid19 lockdowns significantly increased mental distress in NZ children.

The study, published in the international Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, shows that attempted suicides in NZ children aged 10-14 years increased from a baseline of 40 per month to a peak of 90 per month following the lockdowns in 2020. . . 

If the whole Covid-19 response was better health services, business and lives would be easier.

2 Responses to All essential, many safe

  1. Andrei says:

    Actually all businesses are essential – these phrases “essential business” and “essential workers” are highly offensive.

    For some reason petty bureaucrats working in the Department of Total Bullshit are essential but the people who fabricate aluminium windows frames aren’t?

    Give us a break!

    I am sick to death of all these self appointed “experts” trotted out by the media to sow fear and terror into the gullible

    Irrational fear that has allowed this Godless Government turn New Zealand into a hellhole where everything that makes life worth living is closed down in the name of “public safety”

    FFS take the red pill people


  2. Tom Hunter says:

    BTW Elle – remember that debate we had a few weeks ago about all the little children packing the hospitals in places like Texas?

    Well, it looks like it was another over-egged story, Another COVID ‘Fact’ Turns Out To Be A Wild Exaggeration:

    we are being treated daily to headlines such as:

    “Child Covid-19 hospitalizations soar, filling pediatric wings, data show”

    “COVID-19 Hospitals: overrun with COVID patients”

    “As Idaho hospitals ration care, doctors fear a COVID peak may still be weeks away”

    RUN! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES. The usual MSM policy of bleeds-leads. One problem of course:

    Two studies suggest that all the talk of mass hospitalization from the COVID outbreak is a huge exaggeration. Researchers found that a substantial number of those admitted to hospitals – adults and children – either have minor symptoms or were checked in for something else but happened to test positive for COVID after being admitted.

    One of these was reported in The Atlantic no less, just in case you need reassurance about wingbut sources. I was surprised by their honesty.

    Oh, and recall that your LA Times article was by a doctor…

    One doctor was recently seen on a leaked Zoom conference call talking to a North Carolina hospital’s director of marketing about exaggerating COVID hospital cases to make it “a little bit more scary for the public.”)

    Heh. I was amused by my article’s last paragraph though:

    Liberal politicians and the mainstream press could change this, if they’d be more measured in their statements and more honest about the real risks COVID poses. But for their own selfish reasons, neither group wants to do so.

    Any more than they want to do here.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: