Longanimity – a disposition to bear injuries patiently; patient endurance of hardship, injuries, or offense; extraordinary patience under provocation or trial; forbearance; long suffering.
Primary sector keen to streamline rules with govt – Neal Wallace:
Primary sector groups shut out of the final development phases of the Government’s freshwater policy are urging politicians to work with them to make the regulations workable.
Since late May, sector groups have been excluded from the formation of the policy other than a three-day opportunity to respond to the final draft.
“We had limited opportunity as an industry to provide feedback during the final rule writing process,” Beef + Lamb NZ (B+LNZ) chair Andrew Morrison said.
Until then, industry groups were working effectively with the Government and were getting concessions. . .
Government refuses to act on workers – David Anderson:
Agricultural contractors are still struggling to fill the huge hole of workers it needs, despite recruiting 300 locals to the industry.
Meanwhile, the Government is refusing to allow more operators from overseas into the country. Read: Locals only will not ‘cut the mustard’.
Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor has dashed any hopes of this happening, saying there will not be any special accommodation made for overseas agriculture contractor workers.
“The door won’t be open in time for the new season,” he concedes. . .
New Zealand pilots waiting for international aviation to restart will be able to use their aviation transport skills to help meet the urgent need for heavy agriculture machinery operators throughout the country.
The New Zealand Air Line Pilots’ Association (NZALPA) Medical and Welfare Director, Andy Pender said that the Association had been working for several months with the Ministry for Primary Industries, the Rural Contractors’ Association, other government departments and training providers to match pilot expertise with the immediate needs of the agricultural sector.
“By matching skills and the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) licences pilots already hold, we’ve found almost 200 opportunities for pilots to put their skills to use with land-based machinery and do their bit for New Zealand’s essential agriculture economy,” Andy Pender said. . .
Leading agritech and herd improvement cooperative LIC has launched a new fund to support innovations with the potential to positively impact New Zealand’s valuable dairy sector.
LIC has launched an early-stage investment fund, named the LIC AgCelerator™ Fund, for individuals and entities seeking to develop innovations that will deliver value to the dairy industry from generating higher yields, improving animal health, diagnostic tools and improved traceability to sustainability, advancements in breeding techniques and leveraging big data for improvements to farm management.
LIC Chief Executive, Wayne McNee says annual investment in upstream agritech companies grew 44% year-on-year from 2012 to 2018 and a further 1.3% from 2018-2019 highlighting both the opportunities and need for expansion. . .
The NZHIA are using “Innovation as a Service” to identify opportunities for industrial hemp in the food, fibre and processing sectors.
Hemp has long been known for its properties as a food, strong fibre, and an environmental super crop now, it could spell opportunity for New Zealand farmers.
As part of their agriculture super node strategy, Christchurch NZ, with the support of NZHIA (New Zealand Hemp Industries Association), Webtools Agritech, and Hemptastic, are hosting the “Hemp Ideation Challenge” from 5-18 September 2020. . .
His bizarre and uniquely Territorian tale takes social isolation to the extreme, thanks to a can-do attitude and wanton disregard for personal safety.
“I don’t think many people could handle it,” Mr Wilson said.
“I’ve been metres from a crocodile, I’ve been metres from buffalo, I’ve been in a cyclone, and I’ve been metres from lightning hitting the ground.” . .
Federated Farmers is pleased the Green Party has called for us all to embrace science:
Federated Farmers couldn’t agree more with the call from the Green Party today that science should guide the policies and decisions of MPs.
“They issued the challenge in relation to the recent positive COVID-19 cases in Auckland but as a party that should be interested in consistency and logic, we look forward to the Greens also applying this ‘listen to the science’ principle to issues such as genetic engineering technologies and methane emissions,” Federated Farmers President Andrew Hoggard says.
In a press statement headlined ‘Greens call for continued commitment to science from political leaders’, co-leader James Shaw said in the wake of the new cases of COVID-19 from community transmission “… now is the time to band together as a country, be directed by the science, and back good decision making”.
Policy should be backed by science and that should support good decision making all the time, not just in relation to Covid-19.
“This is spot on,” Andrew said. “Science also tells us that unlike the long-lived greenhouse gases carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide, biological methane from New Zealand’s farmed livestock does not need to be reduced to net zero to have no additional effect on global warming.
“A reduction of 10-22% by 2050 is sufficient, yet the climate change legislation put in place by the government has a much harsher, non-science based target which will only add extra significant economic costs and undermine the competitiveness of our meat and dairy in the international market.”
Environment Commission Simon Upton told the government that forestry could be used to offset biological methane but not emissions from fossil fuels and Shaw ignored him.
The Greens have been similarly science obtuse in relation to GE.
“Gene editing technologies have huge potential in our fight to be predator-free, to deal with pest plants such as wilding pines, and to develop new types of grasses that will lead to ruminant animals emitting less methane. But the Greens appear to have had a closed mind on GE, despite scientists such as Sir Peter Gluckman endorsing the need to debate and embrace these technologies,” Andrew said.
The opportunity cost of New Zealand’s stubborn policy toward GE will only increase as the exciting technology continues to mature, leaving New Zealand worse off and offering an increasing competitive advantage to other countries.
Opposition to GE is usually based on emotion not science.
“All we are asking is that consumers and producers are empowered to make their own decisions on the technology, rather than being hamstrung by restrictive regulations that ignore the best available science.
“The Greens’ new professed enthusiasm to be guided by science is most welcome,” Andrew said.
If only the Greens acted on Shaw’s call. Unfortunately the party only supports science when it suits it.
The 1pm announcements about Covid-19 were appointment listening or viewing for many people during the alert level 4 lockdown.
One of their most important aims was to not just inform the public but to education and reassure and it worked at the start.
But after a while some began to think that the briefings were also being used as a political tool to promote the Prime Minister and became increasingly irritated by not just the messaging but the way it was delivered. It made some of us feel we were back at kindergarten and in danger of being sent to the naughty corner if we didn’t do as we were told,
Defenders of the PM say that what she said and the way she said it, was necessary for people who had hearing and/or comprehension problems and/or intellectual disabilities.
They have a point but the suspicion that there was an increasing amount of politicising among the messaging grew each time an important announcement didn’t begin with what was most important but was sandwiched in between what often sounded more like justification and self-promotion.
Sunday’s sermon from the pulpit of truth was a case in point.
Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern is quite rightly “incredibly angry” at her officials for pushing out incorrect Covid-19 testing information.
But New Zealanders have every right to be incredibly angry at the Government for letting that official message remain unchanged for almost an entire day.
That message was that everyone in South and West Auckland should get a Covid-19 test – even if they are asymptomatic.
It was posted from the Government’s official Covid-19 social media channels and led to queues of people in the area looking to get a Covid test.
That means that people with legitimate Covid symptoms faced a much, much longer wait as likely thousands of people scrambled to get tested.
The fact that the stuff-up occurred in the first instance beggars belief.
The information affected roughly 700,000 people in South and West Auckland. . .
Health Minister Chris Hipkins was interviewed on Sunday morning and didn’t mention a correction and the PM didn’t volunteer one, she had to be asked.
She is often praised as a good communicator and her degree in communications will have taught her one of the first lessons journalists learn – start with what matters most. The two most important items on Sunday were level changes that affected everyone & the wrong message about everyone in South and West Auckland needing to be tested.
That the 1pm appointment at the podium of truth didn’t begin with the necessary correction, or at least highlight it very near the beginning is a basic communications failure.
There’s a large gray area between straight information and political promotion.
That the correction didn’t come until after the sermon from the pulpit and only in answer to a question to the PM from a journalist lends evidence to the view that a lot of what comes from the podium moves from the gray to the black where it’s not so much as information for the public as politicising by, and promotion of, the PM.