Recreant – cowardly; unfaithful or disloyal to a belief, duty, or cause; apostate; a coward; a disloyal person who betrays or deserts his cause or religion or political party or friend.
Farmers claim water law lockout – Neal Wallace:
Federated Farmers says it remains shut out of deliberations on the specifics of the Government’s freshwater legislation after unproved claims it leaked confidential information about the policy last year.
Its water spokesman Chris Allen says the accusation was never proved but resulted in the cessation of what he called a constructive working relationship between the farming body and parties considering the new regulations.
“It really did challenge the integrity of Federated Farmers and we were miffed about that. It did not come from feds,” he says. . . .
Environment moves must be fair – Andrew Morrison:
The past few weeks have served to remind New Zealanders about the importance of the country’s primary sector.
Food has become big news.
Every day the media brings us stories of supermarket queues, panic buying and supermarket workers going the extra mile to try to keep shelves stocked against a rising tide of worried consumers.
As farmers we are fortunate to be able to continue producing nutrient-rich food for our nation and our export markets. . .
Covid-19 may have everyone in lockdown but that hasn’t stopped one inventive rural postie from keeping people on her route entertained.
Diane Barton wanted to add “a bit of amusement” to her mail run, so she set up a private Facebook group for her RD1 and RD4 route to get the community involved.
First there was a bear hunt, which quickly descended into chaotic fun, with not only bears turning up in letterboxes and windows, but cows and zoo animals as well.
“I had a trusty heading dog that I borrowed from a client’s mailbox and the dog rounded them up and put them back in their paddocks and cages,” joked Barton, who was quick to point out that “no stuffed animals were harmed in the making of this animal hunt“. . .
Before coronavirus, people were worried about other things. Like the state of New Zealand farming, and climate change. So why were policy makers suddenly getting interested in regenerative agriculture? John McCrone reports.
Wait, are those sunflowers poking their yellow faces above the waist high tangle? Did he just say he loves thistles too? All biodiversity is good?
No wonder Peter Barrett – former campervan entrepreneur and now manager of Central Otago’s 9300 hectare Linnburn Station – has had neighbouring farmers looking askance. . .
As events and conferences throughout New Zealand and around the world cancel and postpone due to the COVID-19 crisis, the Dairy Women’s Network have worked furiously for three weeks to ensure the majority of its annual Allflex DWN2020 Conference will still be held next month.
“While we have had to postpone our face to face conference until 2021, we have adapted to the current situation and are excited to be able to hold four days of online webinars and keynote sessions from the original conference programme,” Dairy Women’s Network Partnerships, Marketing and Communications Manager Zellara Holden said. . .
A diversity of regionally adapted seeds are in short supply in parts of the U.S. So farmers must increasingly rely on a handful of publicly funded seed breeders to supply them.”
Michael Mazourek led the charge through thick-aired greenhouses, cheerfully tallying the destruction. “We inoculated these with a virus,” he said, stopping beside a table topped with stubby squash plants in square plastic pots. Their leaves were anemic and crisp around the edges.
“This was a beautiful disaster,” Mazourek said as he circumnavigated a miniature forest of wrung out pepper plants dangling shriveled fruits. “Our new fancy heaters didn’t work and we had a frost, which is a very climate change-y sort of event.” . .
When Winston Peters put Labour in power I was determined that I wasn’t going to get Ardern Derangement Syndrome.
I’d seen far too much stupidity from people who suffered from Key Derangement Syndrome and was determined not to follow their silly example of making politics personal in this way.
It hasn’t always been easy, but so far I have been able to resist developing ADS.
I accept the PM is a warm and intelligent woman and I’d probably enjoy her company.
However, retaining resistance to ADS doesn’t extend to echoing the adulation that has been heaped on her from many quarters.
That is, as Andrea Vance points out, unhealthy:
Politicians should not have fans. By placing our leaders on a pedestal, it creates an unhealthy and polarising dynamic.
There is evidence of it already in our online political discourse. Any criticism of the Government’s policies and measures is met with a wave of venom.
Even gentle questioning – by opponents, interest groups or the media – is seen as a personal attack on Ardern.
It’s also often seen as sexism which is tiresome.
That’s because when people blindly align themselves to one party and their leader, they tend to overlook the negative effects of their decisions.
Those who seek to hold Ardern to account over flu vaccines, personal protective equipment in the health system, or confusion about restrictions, are villainised or strafed with ‘whataboutism.’ . .
When Ardern is fronting the government that has imposed unprecedented and draconian restrictions on what we can do, at a huge personal, social and economic cost, she must be questioned and questioned hard.
That doesn’t mean personal criticism of her but nor does it mean uncritically repeating her lines such as going early, going hard.
The initial response to Covid-19 was neither.
Then there are legitimate questions over the arbitrary decisions over what businesses and which goods and services have been considered essential under level four lockdown and the economic and social costs of all that.
Candidates will always be judged on their likeability. But infusing politics with an over-the-top “stan culture” turns elections to a sports game, where we are invested in only who wins, not policy or ideology.
And it upends what the political system should be. Prime Ministers are our civil servants, beholden and accountable to us. It should not be a one-sided relationship.
Hero worship eventually reduces our complex, and occasionally flawed, political figures to one-dimensional icons.
Just because Ardern is remarkable, does not mean she is always right.
Over at Croaking Cassandra, Ian Harrison explains six times she has been factually wrong.
He’s found factual errors in what she’s said on transmission rates, the number of cases per 10,000, the number of deaths, containing the pandemic, mortality rates and testing rate.
Steve Elers also says the PM must be held to account over her claims:
During the Covid-19 daily briefings I’ve found myself yelling at the TV screen and sometimes even throwing things at it. Why? Because our journalists seem far too chummy with the prime minister instead of fulfilling their role as the watchdog for society.
A healthy democracy requires the news media to hold power to account, regardless of who is in power, and to question government decisions, just like when the prime minister says: “Elimination doesn’t mean zero cases, it means zero tolerance for cases.” . .
For the health and wellbeing of my TV, I hope the news media will start holding power to account. If journalists can’t find the motivation within themselves to ask critical questions of the prime minister, perhaps they should imagine she is Simon Bridges.
Or perhaps not.
At least some seem to have Bridges Derangement Syndrome where it’s not what he says but that it’s he who says it or the way he says it that becomes the focus of criticism.
Just as putting a politician on a pedestal is wrong, so too is unfairly pulling one back and the media does us a disservice if it lets derangement syndrome get in the way of reasoned reporting and analysis.