Personalty – personal estate or property; movable property, as contrasted with real estate; movable assets (things, including animals) which are not real property, money, or investments; the property that goes to the executor or administrator of the deceased, as distinguished from the realty, which goes to the heirs; the state of being a person; personality.
Global study to benchmark farms – Annette Scott:
A global study of regenerative agriculture is under way to identify chances to extract more value from sheep and beef exports.
Beef + Lamb is doing the study to understand the similarities and difference of regenerative agriculture to NZ farming practices.
The study will look at the opportunities for farmers and include a global consumer perspective to understand what potential there is for red meat exports.
B+LNZ chief executive Sam McIvor said with increasing interest in regenerative agriculture here and abroad, sheep and beef farmers want to lead in that space. . .
The wool industry is still facing challenges – Pam Tipa:
The wool industry continues to face challenges with depressed wool prices for a third year in a row, says Primary Wool Cooperative chair Janette Osborne.
“Combined with increased shearing and associated costs this now means a net loss on wool for many farmers,” she says in the co-op’s annual report
“We are also seeing an overall gradual decline in total wool volumes with both lambs and ewes going to the works woolly and lower grade oddments including dags being used on farm for environmental work.” . .
Global networking group, Meat Business Women are stepping onto the world stage as they accept an invitation to speak at the World Meat Congress (WMC) in Cancun, Mexico on June 12.
Touted as the most influential and informative event on the global meat industry calendar, the WMC brings together approximately 1,000 international delegates to discuss issues and trends affecting meat and livestock organisation which are fundamental for sector outlook.
Meat Business Women Chair, Laura Ryan says she’s delighted with the opportunity to speak directly about the group’s goals to an audience that can instigate change. . .
History has a habit of repeating itself – St John Craner:
NZ Ag yet again faces a number of fronts. Plant-based food, trade wars, geopolitical tensions, coronavirus, commodity cycles and climate. Yet we have options. We can diversify our markets.
China’s coronavirus is highlighting the need for us to ensure we’re not over-reliant on one market. Maybe China is the easy option? Either way they say: “when you choose easy life can be hard, when you choose hard life can be easy”.
There are many other countries in South East Asia (49 to be precise) who want our world-class produce like India, Malaysia, Taiwan, Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, Lao, Indonesia, Cambodia and Myanmar. These countries’ economies are predicted to grow faster than China due to their own growing middle class who are earning higher incomes. . .
Farm societies have common issues – Ben Hancock:
This is the fifth and final in a series of articles written by the latest crop of Nuffield Scholars. This week Beef + Lamb insight and strategy analyst Ben Hancock looks at the possibility of farmers generating energy while combating climate change and being easier on the environment.
Farming the world over, as much as the context, production and scale vary, shows, as the saying goes, the more things change, the more they stay the same.
After nearly six months on the road of my Nuffield journey I was struck by the similarities across continents and farming systems.
So many of the issues we face in New Zealand can be translated to our counterparts around the world. . .
UK Environment Secretary, George Eustice has an unusual solution to improving the environment: paying farmers to retire.
Speaking at the National Farmers’ Union’s 2020 Conference this week, Eustice said that some veteran farmers are ‘standing in the way of change’, reports The Telegraph.
He said that paying veteran farmers a lump sum would enable them to ‘retire with dignity’. . .
Winston Peters is Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister.
It was wearing the latter hat that he went to India last week co-leading a business delegation to increase people and economic engagement with the world’s fifth-largest economy.
He is also leader of New Zealand First and on Saturday one of his MPs, and a fellow minister, delivered a racist rant against Indians on The Nation:
NZ First MP Shane Jones is drawing criticism after saying too many people “from New Delhi” are being allowed to settle in New Zealand.
“If you want another million, 2 million, 3 million people, we should debate it and there should be a mandate, rather than opening up the options, unfettered, and everyone comes here from New Delhi,” Jones told Newshub Nation on Saturday, arguing that New Zealand needs some kind of maximum population policy.
“I think the number of students that have come from India have ruined many of those institutions,” he continued. . .
Debating immigration and the number of immigrants is acceptable. Targeting people from a specific country or location within a country is not.
That he did this as his leader was returning from a Ministerial visit to the city Jones cited could have been a coincidence.
It was far more likely to have been deliberate, but why?
Was he just playing to the gallery of anti-immigration supporters, or was this a thinly-veiled attack on his leader and if so what is his motive?
Whatever the answer to those questions is, a more important one is what is Jacinda Ardern going to do about it?
She can’t, as she is attempting to do with Peters and NZ First’s referral to the SFO, say it is the party’s business not hers.
Jones was on The Nation as a Minister, not as a NZ First MP.
She told him he needed to swat up on the Cabinet Manual after what sounded like an attempt to bribe attendees at a forestry conference with assistance in return for votes.
She has already, justifiably, been labeled weak for the way she is at best slow, and often unwilling, to stand up to MPs and Ministers who cross the line between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour.
Has she got what it takes to tackle Jones, or will she again lack the backbone to deal with what has become habitual boorish unbecoming of an MP, let alone a Minister?
And apropos of behaviour unbecoming, there’s been a deafening silence from the Green Party that is supposed to stand against this sort of degrading ranting.