Mellifluous – having a smooth rich flow; filled with something (such as honey) that sweetens; flowing with honey; sweetened with or as if with honey; pleasingly smooth and musical to hear; sweet-sounding.
The government is introducing a bill it says could lead to a drop of up to 30 cents a litre in petrol prices.
But, as the Taxpayers’ Union keeps reminding us, around half the contributor to fuel prices is tax, including the one that is supposed to make us use less to reduce carbon emissions.
They’re sending mixed messages.
They’re talking out one side of their mouths by taxing us more to increase the price of fuel to encourage us to use less and then the talk from the other side is a threat to legislate to force fuel companies to bring prices down because fuel is too expensive.
Farming needs policy certainty – SImon Bridges:
Our reputation as a producer of quality agricultural products is well known around the world and the sector contributes close to $48 billion in export revenue to our economy. The primary sector provides an economic shot in the arm to New Zealand, and we want to see it continue to grow.
If there’s one thing I’ve picked up from the many farmers I’ve spoken to over the past couple of years, it’s that they want certainty. Farmers and growers already have enough variables to deal with such as the weather, interest rates, disease and international markets. There needs to be a clearly sign-posted direction of travel from the Government that allows everyone to get on board without adverse effects. . .
A former politician has built what could be New Zealand’s fastest dairy shed – able to milk 600 cows an hour.
Two 40-bail rotary platforms turn like giant clockwork dials side by side, and the cows choose the one they prefer to be milked on.
Shane Ardern, who farms at Te Kiri, South Taranaki, with his wife Cathy, is still remembered for driving a tractor named Myrtle up the steps of Parliament in 2003 to protest the Labour Government’s plans to impose a ‘fart tax’ on farmers.
Ardern returned to farming in 2014 after 16 years as National’s Taranaki King Country MP. . .
The Maw family, of Mid Canterbury, has been been farming at Barrhill for four generations, dating back to 1925.
They rotate a broad range of crops including cereals, grass and clovers for grazing and seed production, vegetable seed crops and peas, which are currently being harvested for produce giant, Wattie’s.
Colin Maw has been supplying Wattie’s for over 20 years.
Wattie’s farmers had vast experience in growing the very best peas with knowledge handed down and nurtured between generations, he said. . .
The importance of the humble blueberry – Dr David Chagné:
New Zealand is involved in a US$12.8 million USDA grant to improve the quality of blueberry and cranberry.
The four-year project, led by North Carolina State University, is part of the USDA’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture Specialty Crop Research Initiative, which funds multi-year, multi-institutional collaborative projects.
Genomics Aotearoa and Plant and Food Research Ltd have just become part of this project, and we’re very excited about what that offers – for blueberry producers here, for the New Zealand economy, the consumer and for other genomics researchers.
But what does this actually mean for us? . .
Robotics Plus, a world-leading robotics and automation company developing innovation to unlock new levels of productivity in agriculture, has been named in the THRIVE Top 50, an annual ranking of leading global AgTech companies exemplifying the best in agriculture innovation. Robotics Plus, the only New Zealand company to make the 2020 Top 50 ranking, was just one of five companies featured in the Robotics & Automation category.
Robotics Plus CEO Dr Matt Glenn says it’s a huge honour to receive a coveted spot on THRIVE’s Top 50 global list. “We’re thrilled to be showcased in such a prestigious list alongside exceptional AgTech companies from around the world who are pushing the boundaries of technology and innovation. . .
Don’t mess with farmers – Peter Burke:
Policymakers in Ireland have learned the lesson about demonising farmers – just don’t do it.
That’s the word from a leading Irish scientist, Dr Karl Richards from Teagasc, that country’s semi-state organisation that is responsible for R&D, training and advisory services to farmers.
Richards told Rural News, at recent seminar at Massey University, that policy makers in Ireland have realised that farmers will react badly to being constantly demonised and are less likely to react positively to improving the environment. . .
How would you feel about the tax you pay funding a political party?
An email from the Taxpayers’ Union explains:
The Government are gearing up to use Winston Peters’s and Jami-Lee Ross’s donation scandals to justify replacing electoral donations with taxpayer funded political parties.
Here’s a different idea for cleaning up political donations, which is similar and more cost-effective than taxpayer funding: obey the law.
It’s that simple.
The law is clear. If there is a problem it is politicians and parties not obeying it, and possibly the powers the Electoral Commission has to ensure they do.
Taxpayer funding wouldn’t solve that.
Politicians should let the Serious Fraud Office do its job, instead of exploiting the situation to get their hands on more of your money.
Just this morning, the Greens were on Radio New Zealand calling for reform. Labour’s friendly activists have been in the media calling for the same. And it’s no pipe dream: the Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has previously said she’s keen on the idea.
Oh yes. These parties never let an opportunity to try to get taxpayer funding for themselves go by.
James Shaw says “We have a donor-driven democracy, and we’ve got to get rid of that.” That’s code for the Greens taking your money.
Democracy is supposed to be of the people, for the people, by the people; not of the politicians, for the parties, with the people’s money.
It’s not donors funding parties that’s the problem, it’s too many parties with too few members and supporters. That would only get worse if parties could rely on taxes rather than members and supporters for funds.
We pay taxes for public services, not propaganda.
In a democracy we have to accept governments that gain power legitimately spending taxes on policies we don’t support. We should not have to support our taxes going to support parties, whether or not we support them and what they stand for.
Taxpayer funding for political parties cements the status quo and makes it even harder for new political parties, or groups outside of Parliament, to hold politicians to account.
State funding would also negate the need for parties to build broad membership bases. This is particularly important under MMP because nearly half our MPs are elected through party lists, rather than directly by voters. Taxpayer funding would let parties ignore their members’ views when selecting candidates.
Taxpayer funding would also make it even easier for parties with very few members to thrive.
Like MPs’ pay increases, taxpayer funding of parties could come from nowhere, and be passed through Parliament very quickly. That’s why we need your financial support now to ensure there is a strong voice ready to campaign against these proposals.
The Greens and Labour could try to campaign on taxpayer funding.
That would almost certainly ensure they wouldn’t be returned to government with the power to make that happen.
You can donate to the Taxpayers’ Union to help them campaign against this and other abuses of public funds by going here.