Retcon – to revise retrospectively (an aspect of a fictional work or series), typically by means of a revelation which imposes a different interpretation on previously described events; a piece of new information, in a film, television series, or other fictional work, that imposes a different interpretation on previously described events, typically used to facilitate a dramatic plot shift or account for an inconsistency; a literary device in which the form or content of a previously established narrative is changed.
OZ farmers suffer heavy losses – NFF – Sudesh Kissun:
Australian farmers have lost significant livestock in bushfires raging across the country, says National Farmers’ Federation President Fiona Simson.
Simson says many farmers had lost homes, livestock and infrastructure.
“While we don’t know exact numbers yet, there has been a significant loss of livestock in parts of the country, most recently in areas such as northern Victoria and the south coast of NSW,” she says. . .
The ‘‘sheer weight’’ of issues facing farmers in Otago and Southland is taking a serious toll on their mental health and wellbeing, a Beef + Lamb New Zealand Economic Service report says.
The annual lamb crop report, released this week, said morale among sheep and beef farmers in the two regions was low.
The implications for farming practices and effects on profitability of government policies announced affecting the sector were unclear but likely to be far reaching.
While policies covering freshwater and greenhouse gas emissions were prominent, the likes of Mycoplasma bovis, reform of the National Animal Identification and Tracing scheme, tightening of bank lending arrangements, the One Billion Trees programme, winter grazing practices, biodiversity, urban perception of farming, and how to manage succession were also having notable impacts. . .
New boss sees pastoral potential – Richard Rennie:
The vast grassland expanses of South America offer some exciting opportunities for Gallagher’s new general manager Darrell Jones.
Jones is a couple of months into his new role but almost 20 years into working for the agri-tech company.
Formerly the company’s national sales manager he is excited by what his recent business excursion to South America revealed.
“We have had a presence in South America for some time but everything sold over there is basically from behind the counter.
“We want to really work on what our point of difference is for electric fence systems there and a big part of that is farmer education. . .
Farmlands moves focus forward – Neal Wallace:
New Farmlands chairman Rob Hewett wants the farm supplies retailer to shift its focus to meeting the anticipated needs of farmers five years in the future.
Given the requirement for farmers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and address freshwater quality Farmlands needs to help its 70,000 shareholder-owners make those adjustments and that means supplying advice, services and technology they will need in the future.
“Farmers want a road map and hope and we are moving the company from being very good at providing something farmers needed five years ago to provide things we anticipate farmers will need five years from now.” . .
Mechanisation new for the US – Tessa Nicholson:
The impetus behind developing the Klima stripper back in 2007 was a continual lack of labour during the pruning season.
Growers and companies all over the country were facing shortages and every year there was the underlying fear that pruning would not be completed in time for bud burst.
The Klima quickly caught the attention of grape growers in both New Zealand and Australia, but breaking into the US has until recently been a difficult one, says Klima founder Marcus Wickham. . .
Visiting Australian celebrity chef Justin North enjoyed a chance to sample the gourmet BBQ lunch menu before heading to the kitchen to work with Executive Chef Mauro Battaglia at Walter Peak High Country Farm in Queenstown on Tuesday 7 January.
North says the first impression when walking through the doors into the Colonel’s Homestead Restaurant is the absolutely beautiful aroma.
“Credit to Executive Chef Mauro Battaglia and his whole team as it’s clear that a lot of love, care and thought goes into the food. You can see there is such a lovely culture within the kitchen team, and everyone is so passionate about what they are doing. You can tell it’s more than just a job to everyone.” . .
The insidious flaw in the “Less Meat” argument — we need soil, not soy – Seth Itzkan:
The insidious flaw with the “less meat” argument is that it implies that meat is bad (when, of course, it isn’t) while looking the other way as it advances soil-depleting, GMO soy, faux meat products at the expense of nutritionally superior, regenerative beef and dairy alternatives that are essential for enhancing soil carbon, reviving pasture ecosystems, and just now gaining a foothold in supermarkets.
What Burger King and other franchises should do instead of carrying Impossible Foods paddies, is to insist that each region source at least 10% of their meats locally and via ecologically restorative production. That would jumpstart the food revolution genuinely poised to deliver a safe climate. . .
. . .The Koala Relocation Society started the petition a week ago saying “koalas are functionally extinct in Australia, and could thrive in New Zealand, as many other Australasian species do”.
It’s estimated hundreds of thousands, even millions of animals have perished in the fires ravaging parts of Australia.
“New Zealand has 28,575 hectares planted in eucalypts, most is located in the Central North Island, and are similar to much older forests from Australia, as they grow fast here,” the petition read. . .
Which other species that functionally thrive in New Zealand would the petitioners be talking about?
The possums that carry TB and threaten trees and birds? The wallabies that eat native trees and farm pasture?
The toll the bushfires have taken on Australian wildlife is devastating but there are much better ways for New Zealand to help than trying to establish populations of koalas here.
We don’t need another pest.
. . . So what’s the moral of the story? That so much of the political discourse these days is seen to be more focused on the game playing and the sport of politics, rather than the substance. And that is contributing to the sense that politicians are increasingly out of touch with voters.
We in the media can cop some of the blame. In our drive to explain the “why” and “how” of politics it can look like we’re focusing on personalities rather than policies.
It’s also no secret that there is a voracious appetite for personality-driven political coverage, while the appetite for policy-driven stories is more niche.
People are interested in people but playing personalities is no substitute for informed and intelligent analysis of policy.
I don’t condemn that; to an extent, I’ve always believed that we vote for our politicians as much on character or judgement as the policies they hawk.
Their credibility is central to whether we believe in their promises.
Credibility, character and judgement are not the same as personality-driven stories and the latter can often distort the former.
But in the hot house of Parliament – where politicians and the media collide regularly on the chaotic weekly caucus run, or “on the tiles”, which is where MPs stop for journalists on their way into the House – it’s all too easy to lose perspective.
It’s also a chicken and egg thing. Politicians pay armies of spin doctors to churn out policy positions in soundbites, and the leaders spend hours being coached by their media minders on how to answer questions.
If this was all about enabling a substantive policy debate, or holding their opponents to account, fair enough.
But that’s not it, of course. It’s mostly about framing the narrative, and staying on message. It’s about winning the game in other words.
The media doesn’t have to buy into this, but the time pressure most journalists work under makes it difficult not to.
The stakes are high so it’s not surprising they play the game this way. Winning power means getting to bend an economy and a people to suit their vision.
But that’s also why we deserve much better.
So once Ardern names the date, let’s all pledge to strip this election back to its essentials, and focus on the story behind the personalities and the soundbites.
That would be a welcome change, but sport is so much easier to get across than substance so I won’t hold my breath waiting for the change.