Delivering disappointment

This was supposed to be the government’s year of delivery.

David Farrar posted this on Kiwiblog a couple of days ago and got pushback from a Minister’s office:

A Minister’s Office has said that there has in fact been 149 million trees planted. The official policy is to include trees planted by the private sector as part of business as normal. They are correct this is the official Government position today but neither the pre-election policy or the coalition agreement stated the billion trees would include other plantings. In fact the coalition agreement says:

A $1b per annum Regional Development (Provincial Growth) Fund, including … Planting 100 million trees per year in a Billion Trees Planting Programme

That very clearly implies they would find 100 million trees a year, and has nothing about including non-funded trees that would occur regardless of the Government.

So I stand by my position that the Government promised to fund one billion trees and has only funded 2.5% of that to date.

This shifting of goalposts is typical of the government. They’ve done it with police numbers too.

The Government has shifted the goalposts in its promise to deliver more frontline police after what seems like a slip of the tongue by Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern.

It promised to “strive towards adding 1800 new police” over three years but in a game of semantics, it is now saying it will deliver 1800 new trained recruits by next month.

The move has drawn the ire of the Police Association who say it is not good enough and that the Government has broken its promise to police. . .

The Government has insisted that 1800 extra new officers was never a target, but an aspiration. . .

Not a goal, but an aspiration.

That’s the government summed up in six words and the result is a year of delivering disappointment.

2 Responses to Delivering disappointment

  1. adamsmith1922 says:

    Reblogged this on The Inquiring Mind and commented:
    The year of non-delivery continues


  2. Andrei says:

    This is hardly astonishing given Jacida Ardern’s resumé. It is thin to say the least.

    Filled with positions relying on gift of of empty rhetoric but none requiring tangible, measurable results.

    She was only givrn the gig as leader of the parliamentary Labour Party because they were floundering at the polls in the lead up to the least election she was chosen as a hail mary pass to change the trajectory of the poll results – a move that came off at the time…

    She makes good fodder for the cover of Women’s Weekly but then again so do the Kardashins

    It is easy to talk the talk but not so easy to walk the walk.

    We all want to end child poverty in this country – there is nobody who thinks it is a good thing to have children living in deprivation. But promising to fix it and actually fixing it are two different things. One is easy the other is very very hard


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: