Who needs the Greens when Labour hates farmers this much? – Mike Hosking:
Here’s the irony of David Parker. Parker was once the Minister of Economic Development and is currently the Minister of Trade and Export Growth – and yet he has done more than anyone these past two weeks to achieve exactly the opposite.
It was Parker who stopped the hydro dam on the West Coast despite every council, three of them, iwi, the Department of Conservation and 90 per cent of Coasters all being for it.
And now he’s put out water regulations that may as well come with the headline ‘we hate farmers’.
Tim Mackle’s piece in the Herald on this subject is excellent. It basically starts with him wistfully remembering a time when farmers were liked. Well I have a message to rural New Zealand: you still are, at least by people like me, realists who understand the energy, effort, and risk required to do what you do. . .
The waters are rising on farming – Kerry Worsnop:
The release of the Essential Freshwater Report, ‘Action for Healthy Waterways’ will undoubtable add further turbulence to an already stormy torrent of proposed Central Government policy effecting Regional Councils and land based industries.
The report’s stated intention is to ‘stop the further degradation of New Zealand’s Freshwater resources and start making immediate improvements so that water quality is materially improving within 5 years’. The reference to immediacy is no idle threat, with Regional Councils being expected to comply with many of the proposals by June 2020.
No one can argue with the intent of the report, and few would negate the importance of prioritising our greatest natural resource, however the scope and likely implications of the report will be a topic of much discussion in the coming weeks and months. . .
Forgotten aspects of water – Mike Chapman . .
The Government released its consultation on freshwater this week (click here). We are now busy analysing it in detail and it is really too early to reach a view about the ultimate impact, especially before the consultation.
Two of the background documents also released make interesting reading and provide insight into the thinking behind these proposals. Te Kāhui Wai’s recommendations are strident. They go to the core of the water issues facing New Zealand including: iwi/hapu water rights, a moratorium on additional discharges for the next 10 years, establishing a Te Mana o te Wai Commission, and developing a new water allocation system that conforms with iwi/hapu rights and obligations.
The Freshwater Leaders Group’s recommendations include: bringing our water resources to a healthy state within a generation, taking immediate steps to stop our water becoming worse, and achieving an efficient and fair allocation system. They also recommend an immediate stop to poor agricultural and forestry practices, and a complete halt to the loss of wetlands. In summary, the reports are very similar in the outcomes they are seeking – immediate action to stop further degradation.
In all I’ve read, missing is how much water New Zealand gets each year and how much use we make of that water. NIWA figures show that 80% of our water flows out to sea, 18% evaporates and only 2% is used. My point is that there is more than enough water for everyone. The problem is we are not being smart in our use of water and we are not planning for the impact of climate change – long dry summers. . . .
Time for change – Neal Wallace:
A one-size-fits-all approach to freshwater management will penalise farmers shrinking their environment footprint, Beef + Lamb chairman Andrew Morrison says.
Farmers, like everyone, want clean, fresh water but the blanket regulatory approach in the Government’s Action for Health Waterways discussion document lumps those who have cut their footprint with those who haven’t.
Federated Farmers’ reaction was scathing.
Water spokesman Chris Allan said proposed nitrogen reduction targets of 80% mean farming will cease in large parts of rural New Zealand. . .
Fonterra’s clean-out is overdue – Hugh Stringleman:
Fonterra’s farmer-shareholder with the largest number of shares believes the co-operative’s house cleaning and write-downs are absolutely necessary and overdue.
Former director Colin Armer, who with his wife Dale has 10 million supply shares, says over-valued assets mean farmers sharing-up in the past four years paid too much.
He has made a formal complaint to the Financial Markets Authority over inconsistent valuations and executive performance payments. . .
Irrigating farmers record better enviro audit grades – Nigel Malthus:
Irrigating farmers in the Amuri district in North Canterbury are continuing to record improved environmental performance.
The latest round of Farm Environment Plan audits by the Amuri Irrigation Environmental Collective have given 97% of the farmers collective A or B grades, the remaining 3% a C grade and none a D.
That contrasts with 20% rated as C and 6% as D in the first round of collective audits four years ago. . .