Has any government not put money into policies which aim to improve wellbeing?
I can’t think of a single one that hasn’t put considerable amounts into health, education, welfare, infrastructure . . . any and all of the areas that impact on and contribute to wellbeing.
Just two years ago, then Finance Minister Steven Joyce said:
. . .This budget is about delivering more of the public services, the infrastructure, the resilience, and the incomes that New Zealanders need to get ahead and to provide for their families.
This budget is about the opportunity we have to build on the platform we have all created and deliver greater prosperity for New Zealanders. . .
This Government is focused on helping our most vulnerable people lead more successful lives. . .
Initiatives included helping people move from benefits to work, improving safety of victims of family violence, investment in social housing, funding for caregiver support and social initiatives aimed at tackling long-term issues for the most vulnerable.
It included measures to help children get a better start in live and there was a significant increase in mental health funding..
Social investment is about tackling our most challenging social issues. The combination of these new initiatives and the Government’s decisions about family incomes will allow us to make serious headway with some of the longer-term challenges faced by the most vulnerable New Zealanders. . .
This budget is all about “Delivering for New Zealanders”.
It takes four significant steps to bring the benefits of a stronger economy to all New Zealanders. It makes a big investment in public services, it makes a record investment in new infrastructure, it improves the resilience of our country to future shocks, and it strengthens families by lifting their incomes.
It’s important that we remember that the only reason we get to have this conversation is because we have a strong and growing economy built on a strong economic plan.
We must maintain our focus on growing the economy and sticking to the plan.
It is only by doing that, that we can provide for the prosperity of all New Zealanders.
What a contrast between the former government’s careful management and understanding that economic growth is essential to support social initiatives and the current one which is very good at soft words that seek to disguise a slowing economy.
The debate continued and then-PM BIll English spoke:
. . .We are unashamedly addressing the hard core of New Zealand’s longest-run social problems, and in this Budget there are 14 initiatives that do that. I want to pay tribute to public servants who, I know, find it difficult to fit the model. It creates a lot of tension and sometimes a bit of frustration, but we are making some progress because what is the point of having a Government if it cannot deal with the most complex, the most vulnerable, . .
The previous government called it social investment. Its words were backed up by policies that were working to improve lives and sustainably funded by a growing economy. .
This government calls it wellbeing and so far it’s only words. If it’s going to be more than words and to make a significant and positive difference it will have to do a lot better on delivering, not just on its promises but on economic growth too, than it has to date.
The projected surplus next year is only $1.4 billion. That’s a big number but not in the context of government spending.
Opposition leader Simon Bridges points out:
. . . The Prime Minister boasts in her press release that growth is forecast to average 2.6 per cent over the next four years, under the National Government growth was 4 per cent. This Government simply can’t be trusted with the economy.
“NZ First has once again shown that it holds the purse strings with today’s announcements of a billion on rail that nobody wants and even more for forestry. That’s on top of Shane Jones’ billion dollar slush fund and the billion dollars already promised for trees. The cost of this coalition is not worth it for New Zealanders with what they’re getting in return, and it certainly isn’t improving anyone’s wellbeing.
“It’s no wonder Grant Robertson has had to drop his self-imposed debt target and increase the spending limit by $17 billion so he can fund the Government’s bad spending decisions. Surpluses are forecast to be billions of dollars lower than they were just a few months ago. . .
Changing the language doesn’t change the fact that wellbeing can only be built on a strong and growing economic foundation.