The Carbon Zero Bill isn’t being led by science when it comes to methane:
Farmers should be able to use forests to offset methane and nitrous oxide emissions, Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment Simon Upton says.
And he says fossil fuel emitters should not be allowed to use forest to offset their gas.
That will lead to better quality land use change.
Upton was responding to farmers’ concern the Government’s Zero Carbon Bill will lead to wholesale afforestation with inevitable land use change in response to climate change.
But the shape of that land use change can be better managed by farmers working together and taking a landscape approach to establishing forests rather than blanket planting by those seeking to simply offset their emissions, Upton said.
“That’s the bit I think needs to be thought about a bit harder.” . .
Farmers are more than concerned about this.
We’re all exhorted to follow the science on climate change but the government is going against the science in allowing fossil fuel emitters to offset their gas with forests.
It’s doubling the damage by not allowing farmers to offset methane emissions with trees.
It’s also going against the Paris Accord which said emissions mitigation shouldn’t come at the expense of food production.
The sale of productive farmland for forestry is already having a negative impact or rural communities:
Subsidies for forestry are distorting the market for farmland, killing jobs and the science says it won’t work to offset fossil fuel emissions.
Politics, bureaucracy and emotion trump science and facts again and farmers and rural communities will pay the cost.