A couple of centuries since the Enlightenment when reason ought to rule, Dave Hansford says the denial agenda is endangering the environment and economy:
The greatest threats to our native wildlife – and our rural economy – may yet be science denial and conspiracy belief.
Early in December, the Court of Appeal issued a final, frustrated rejection of the legal challenges of the Brook Valley Community Group (BVCG), ending a dismal and costly charade of junk science and delirious zealotry.
Or has it? . .
Anti-1080 sentiment is now an indentured article of faith in the New Zealand conspiracy community, where facts hold no currency. There is no tool in the policy box to deal with wilful, determined ignorance, . .
People might be entitled to their beliefs, but that confers no implicit right to be taken seriously.
It’s not just anti-1080 movement where junk science and delirious zealotry rule and facts hold no currency.
It’s sadly ironic that some of those so vehemently opposed to 1080 are as vehemently opposed to genetic modification even though it could hold the key to an alternative form of pest eradication.
But most opposition to genetic modification is based on emotion not facts, sentiment rather than science.
So too is a lot of the anti-farming rhetoric that is voiced by people who either don’t know, or won’t accept, the facts.
They are the ones who pat themselves on the backs for doing what they think is green but is only greenwash, blame all farmers for the poor performance of a few and give no credit at all to the majority who follow best environmental practices, based on science.