5 good questions

Energy Voice has five good questions the government should answer before passing the oil and gas ban:

1. Where exactly are the new, high tech, well-paid jobs going to come from to replace those jobs lost in the oil and natural gas sector?

Buzzwords like innovation and leading-edge sound great on a Wellington whiteboard but real people are losing good jobs right now – for no environmental or any other gain.

Taranaki has prospered from oil and natural gas, but the ban ends any hope for Southland, Otago and South Canterbury getting the same opportunity.

2. Where is the Government going to find the $8 billion dollars to replace the lost royalties and revenue missed from ending oil and gas exploration, and eventually production?

That $8 billion could do a lot of good on things like hospitals, schools or the environment. What extra taxes and special climate levies will be needed to make up for the lost $8 billion?

3. How does the exploration ban stop imported oil and gas making up the lost NZ production?

Oil and natural gas make up 60% of New Zealand’s energy use. The exploration ban does nothing to reduce that 60% so we are going to keep using oil and natural gas for a long time.

If we don’t produce that fuel ourselves, we will just have to import it.

4. Why has the government ignored its own officials’ advice that the exploration halt will actually increase global emissions?

Ending exploration was supposed to be about stopping global carbon emissions, not increasing them. Did they take advice from Greenpeace instead?

5. How exactly is New Zealand showing ‘global leadership’?

The rest of the world is still searching for new energy sources.

Only three other counties have banned oil and natural gas exploration – and they’re all connected to international natural gas pipelines.

Aren’t we sending jobs, people and investors overseas and simply making New Zealand poorer as a result?

The exploration ban is greenwash at its worst – a policy that purports to be better for the environment but is the antithesis of sustainability.

It will have high economic, environmental and social costs.

One Response to 5 good questions

  1. Andrei says:

    Gemeis Enregy is importing coal to keep Huntly going because of a shortage of home produced Natuaral Gas 😦

    The geniuses in Wellington strike again. Basic economics is not their strong suit and as for hard science they seem totally illiterate

    When I was in Melbourne I saw an electric car proudly proclaiming on a bumper sticker “Zero Emmissions” – do you know how electricity is generated in Victoria|?

    LIGNITE

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: