The real rort

The furore over the leaking of  Simon Bridges’ expenses has highlighted the real rort:

. . the fact that Crown limo’s for the Opposition leader are charged out at a higher rate than is charged to Government . . .

If there is a reasonable and responsible reason for that, please tell me.

The only one I can think of is neither reasonable nor responsible – it’s a political decision to somehow disadvantage the opposition.

Ministers are running the country and they need to get around the country to do that. The opposition is there to hold the government to account, it can’t do that sitting in Wellington. Its leader’s travel is essential to the role, in the public service and making it more expensive is adding to the cost of democracy.

Why should taxpayers pay more for the opposition leader’s travel than that of government ministers?

3 Responses to The real rort

  1. adamsmith1922 says:

    Reblogged this on The Inquiring Mind.

  2. Will says:

    It would be interesting to know if the same charging rates applied when National was in power. Can’t be too hard to find out. If not, this seems amazingly petty. Even by Labour’s standards.

  3. Bloke in Auckland says:

    Isn’t it all a money go round that taxpayers foot the entire bill of the Crown car fleet? Therefore the apportionment of the costs between the Government and the Opposition as users, through some charging schedule, is artificial – all parties jointly comprise the government. If so the higher charge-out to Opposition users must be a political decision. There is no other equitable answer.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: