How did it get so bad so soon?
It’s a mess of ministers
acting like goons.
My goodness how the
mess has grewn.
How did it get so bad so soon?
With apologies to Dr Seuss, how did it get so bad so soon?
Audrey Young writes that Jacinda Ardern will forgive Winston Peters for anything, even the unforgivable.
A National MP joked this week that the Opposition didn’t want things to get so bad under Jacinda Ardern’s maternity leave that the country was desperate for her return – they just wanted a medium level of dysfunction.
That threshold was almost reached this week even before the big event, and things got worse as the week wore on.
Ardern’s faith in Winston Peters being able to manage the inevitable bush fires that will flare when she is away must be seriously undermined given that he and his party have caused many of them.
A series of accidental and deliberate mishaps has raised questions about a series of important issues including basic coalition management, ministerial conventions, the application of the “No Surprises” policy, and when a minister is not a minister. . .
Stacey Kirk calls it a three ring circus with one ringmaster at the centre .
Consensus government in action, or a bloody awful mess?
It’s difficult to characterise the past week as anything but the latter and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern may be worried about whether she’ll have a Government to come back to when she returns from maternity leave. . .
Patrick Gower wants the old Kelvin Davis back.
Patrick Gower on The AM Show. Credits: Video – The AM Show; Image – Newshub.
Kelvin Davis is a “wounded man walking” who better watch out, says Newshub national correspondent Patrick Gower.
The Corrections Minister on Wednesday announced plans for a new prison, but appeared to be unaware how many of its inmates would be double-bunked.
Corrections boss Ray Smith interjected after Mr Davis froze, confirming Newshub’s suggestion it would be around half.
“I get nervous before interviews,” was Mr Davis’ explanation, when asked about it on The AM Show. . .
Duncan Garner describes government MPs as misfit kids.
. . .It’s taken them three minutes to look as shabby, arrogant and as broken-down as a third-term government suffering rampant hubris and pleading to be put out of its misery. . .
Sue Bradford thinks the Greens are in mortal danger.
The Green’s water bottling decision exposes potentially fatal flaws and complacency at the heart of Green Parliamentary operations
The Green parliamentary wing seem to be clueless about the mortal danger they face following news this week that their own minister, Eugenie Sage, has signed off on the sale and expansion of a water bottling plant at Otakiri Springs. . .
Hamish Rutherford writes with Winston Peters in charge everything could be up for grabs.
. . . These are extraordinary times. Suddenly, with a Government already battling to keep business confidence up, with a story that the economy keeps on rocking, it seems as if everything is up for grabs.
We are now being handed lessons that have been coming since Peters walked into the Beehive theatrette on October 20 and announced he was forming a Government with the Left.
A Government so broad that the issues on which there is division become so amplified that they could almost appear to outnumber ones where there is consensus.
Where previous coalitions since the creation of MMP managed to keep together because the centre of power was so obvious, the timing of Peters’ action will be further unsettling. . .
Health Minister David Clark has been accused of trying to gag a health board chair.
A leaked voicemail message appears to show Health Minister David Clark attempting to gag top health officials over the woeful state of Middlemore Hospital buildings.
Clark has rejected the accusation, which has stemmed from audio of him telling former Counties Manukau District Health Board chair Rabin Rabindran it was “not helping” that the DHB kept commenting publicly.
Emails suggest he also attempted to shut down the DHB from answering any questions along the lines of who knew what, and when, about the dilapidated state of Middlemore buildings. . .
Peter Dunne asks is the coalition starting to unravel?
Almost 20 years ago, New Zealand’s first MMP Coalition Government collapsed. It was not a dramatic implosion on a major point of principle, but was provoked by a comparatively minor issue – a proposal to sell the Government’s shares in Wellington Airport – and came after a series of disagreements between the Coalition partners on various aspects of policy.
There has been speculation this week in the wake of New Zealand First’s hanging out to dry of the Justice Minister over the proposed repeal of the “three strikes” law that the same process might be starting all over again. While it is far too soon to draw conclusive parallels, the 1998 experience does set out some road marks to watch out for. . .
Michael Reddell writes on how the government is consulting on slashing productivity growth.
. . I have never before heard of a government consulting on a proposal to cut the size of the (per capita) economy by anything from 10 to 22 per cent. And, even on their numbers, those estimates could be an understatement. . . .
Quite breathtaking really. We will give up – well, actually, take from New Zealanders – up to a quarter of what would have been their 2050 incomes, and in doing so we will know those losses will be concentrated disproportionately on people at the bottom. Sure, they talk about compensation measures . .
But the operative word there is could. The track record of governments – of any stripe – compensating losers from any structural reforms is pretty weak, and it becomes even less likely when the policy being proposed involves the whole economy being a lot smaller than otherwise, so that there is less for everyone to go around. The political economy of potential large scale redistribution just does not look particularly attractive or plausible (and higher taxes to do such redistribution would have their own productivity and competitiveness costs). . .
And the Dominion Post lists mis-steps and mistakes and concludes:
. . .Some of this has been simply amateurish.
Such things are often a sign of a government that has outlived its mandate and begun to implode around the core of its own perceived importance. In its tiredness it can trip over the most obvious hurdles.
This Government is barely nine months old. It needs to find its feet, and quickly.
Has there ever been a government that has attracted this sort of criticism just a few months after gaining power?
How did this government get so bad so soon?