When politicians make promises do you take them at their word?
Under MMP that’s harder because they can always use the excuse, that was their policy but had to let it go during coalition negotiations.
But if it was a promise made by the two parties in government and their coalition partner outside government that one can’t be used.
National, rightly, put lives before politics:
Environment Minister Nick Smith responded to the commitment and said the parties were either making empty promises to the families or proposing to water down a law intended to prevent future workplace tragedies.
“It is a hollow political stunt for parties to promise manned re-entry of the mine by the end of 2018,” he said.
“It would be reckless for politicians to override the 800-page detailed assessment that concluded that manned entry deep into this drift was too risky to life.
“There is no cover-up. There is no conspiracy. Pike River was a horrible industrial accident that unnecessarily killed 29 men.
“The greatest duty we owe the memory of these men is to take the risks of explosions in gassy coalmines seriously and to comply with the new workplace safety laws that stemmed from the Royal Commission of Inquiry [into the Pike River Mine Tragedy].”
Such promises are oh so easy in opposition, but what happens when the reality of government bites?
Pike River Mine minister Andrew Little says he cannot guarantee a re-entry of the mine and has told family members that he will do what he can but safety is the top priority. . .
“Ultimately, and the families are very clear, the first principle of the set of principles that are governing what we do is safety, the safety of anybody involved in the re-entry project. I’m not going to put anybody at undue risk. I’m simply not going to.”
He did not intend to legislate for any exemption to the health and safety laws or immunity from liability for the Pike River Agency.
Safety was the priority of the previous government in the face of harsh criticism from the Pike River families and then-opposition parties supporting them.
That was the right position.
The Pike River disaster was a tragedy. There are many unanswered questions on how it happened and the shortcoming that led to it happening.
Some of the answers to those questions might be found if it was possible to safely reenter the mine.
But safely is and must always be the operative word.
The bottom line that National and the mine owners stuck to still stands: no lives must be endangered, no lives must be lost, to retrieve the dead.
Some families have accepted this.
Some have not and put their faith in the politicians who promised them manned entry would be undertaken.
Little will be criticised for his safety-first stance, but this time it’s the right one.
The wrong one was making a promise that he and the other politicians, including his leader, Jacinda Ardern, should never have made.
Those politicians were mining personal grief for political ends.
It was despicable behaviour.