The last Labour government was criticised for nanny-statism and the new one is already in danger of courting the same criticism:
Parenting 101 from your friendly Labour Government.
New parents may relish the idea of both parents being home together, able to bond as a family in those first few weeks of a newborn’s life.
But the Government advises “no”, that’s not necessarily in the interests of your baby.
That’s why it intends to vote down a National Party amendment to the Government’s paid parental leave extension, that would let both parents take their paid leave together.
“Our concern with that is the likelihood it would reduce the amount of time that baby has to bond with their primary caregiver,” said Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Iain Lees-Galloway.
Who knows best what’s best for babies and their parents – the parents or the government?
If both parents were off at the same time, it would reduce the total amount of time that baby’s parents would be on leave. National’s amendment would allow for parents to make a choice – it does not compel them to take leave at the same time.
There’s no compulsion, no we-know-best. It would just give flexibility to parents who could choose to take none, some or all of the leave at the same time, depending on what suited them and their babies.
In all likelihood, Labour doesn’t really believe it knows better than parents what suits them.
So they’d put politics before parents, and babies and risk the accusation of nanny-statism because it’s not their idea.
That’s simply pettiness.