Why should you vote for National? #1

A couple of weeks ago Andrei challenged me to write about why people should vote for National.

When people ask me that I usually start by saying that they need to start by looking at the party’s values and see how closely they align with their own.

National’s values are:

* Loyalty to our country, its democratic principles, and our Sovereign as Head of State
* National and personal security
* Equal citizenship and equal opportunity
* Individual freedom and choice
* Personal Responsibility
* Competitive enterprise and reward for achievement
* Limited government
* Strong families and caring communities
* Sustainable development of our environment

If all, or at least most, of these align with yours, that’s the first good reason to vote for National.

The second reason is economic management.

National is a party that understands the need to balance the books while respecting that it uses taxpayers’ money to do so.

Just as individuals, families, businesses and other organisations have to have their finances in order to comfortably cover necessities, have enough to cope with unexpected eventualities and afford some extras, so must governments. A strong economy is the only way to sustainably afford the first world services and infrastructure we need and expect.

When National took office in 2008 it inherited forecasts for a decade of deficits.

Successive National-led governments, thanks in no small part to then Finance Minister, now Prime Minister Bill English, managed to return to surplus in less than 10 years.

They did that in spite of the global financial crisis, earthquakes and other natural disasters, and they protected the most vulnerable and continued to increase spending on health and education while doing it.

They did it by looking not just at the quantity of the spend but the quality, cutting waste, reducing costs and charging government departments with providing greater value for taxpayers’ money.

Once surpluses were assured, they put more into health, education and welfare and introduced tax cuts which allowed people to keep a bit more of their own money.

National has proved you can trust it to provide sound economic management and that it is prepared to spend for long term benefit even if it costs more in the short-term.

Nowhere is this more evident than in welfare.

National took an actuarial approach to benefits, worked out what was driving the projected long-term increase in benefit dependency and the social and financial costs associated with that.

It then put money into helping those most in need to get work-ready and into jobs. The success of this is evident in the drop in number of people on benefits, especially younger sole parents.

The latest Household Labour Force Survey, independently produced by Statistics New Zealand, shows the unemployment rate is now at 4.8 per cent, the lowest level since December 2008.

It’s easy to underestimate just how significant this is. When National took office in 2008, at the height of the crisis, unemployment was spiking and projected to keep growing. Businesses were closing, people were losing their houses, and government debt was blowing out and on track to reach unsustainable levels.

All of this was despite fair economic conditions during the 2000s giving the previous Labour Government ample opportunity to prepare for a rainy day.

National made stabilising the economy a priority, which included some tough decisions. We developed a clear and consistent economic plan to get the country back on its feet, which included taking on debt to provide support to those at the hardest edge of the crisis.

We lowered taxes to help stimulate business growth. We began a huge programme of infrastructure development to catch up with years of neglect by Labour.

And we made significant reforms to our welfare system to help beneficiaries get back into work more quickly, and stay in work, so this latest economic shock didn’t cause another generation to fall into long-term, welfare dependency.

National has stuck with this plan, backing our businesses to grow so they can hire more people and lift incomes. The number of people unemployed has dropped by 3,000 this quarter alone, and we’ve helped you create over 181,000 new jobs in past two years.

Particularly pleasing is the reduction in the number of young people not in employment, education or training (NEETs). The rate fell to 11.1 per cent, down from 12.7 per cent in the previous quarter. The number of women who are NEET is at the lowest level on record.

All of these things are the positive results you get from National’s strong, consistent economic plan. And it’s just the beginning – there’s a lot more we’re going to do. . .

This year’s Budget and policy already announced  show that National will continue to do what has been proven to work and, as surpluses allow, do more of it.

National can be trusted with public money, to keep a leash on spending, measure success by what it achieves rather than how much it spends, and allow people to keep more of what they earn.

No combination of opposition parties could be trusted to do that.

Post #2 and more will follow.

Advertisements

3 Responses to Why should you vote for National? #1

  1. Andrei says:

    When I made that challenge you were being drawn into gloating about the meltdown of the Green party and being drawn into negativity

    The Greens are self destructing without National needing to be involved, it is a self inflicted wound

    I am a natural supporter of Bill English and was until he allowed himself to be rolled by unpleasant people who unfortunately gravitate to the centers of power to the detriment of the rest of us

    There is an old adage if the Government wants to support an economic activity they subsidize it while if they want to discourage it they tax it

    Here’s the thing raising a family is an economic activity. one of the central economic activities to the future wellbeing of our society

    And yet the Government for years has been subsidizing solo parenthood with the DPB and at the same time penalizing the nuclear family by not allowing the breadwinner to claim a rebate on his tax liabilities for his dependents – a system that was operant during the baby boom

    So here’s an idea why not ditch the Ministry of Women’s Affairs and replace it with a Ministry of Family Affairs and staff it with Family people. And replace WFF with tax rebates for people with dependents, wives, children and elderly relatives

    Wont happen its too “Patriarchal “

  2. homepaddock says:

    WFF is effectively a tax rebate for workers with children, though not other dependents.

    I have no problems about canning the Women’s Ministry. Not so sure about replacing it with Families Ministry. Didn’t we have one as result of a Peter Dunne deal with Labour? The only thing I remember it doing was redefine family.

  3. Andrei says:

    WFF is effectively a tax rebate for workers with children, though not other dependents.

    No its not, it comes across as Government Largesse, its smoke and mirrors to make it look like the benevolent Government is giving you something – too bad it is actually giving you something that it took from you in the first place

    A tax rebate leaves the money you earned in you hand and is explicitly something that you earned with the sweat of your brow

    Didn’t we have one as result of a Peter Dunne deal with Labour? The only thing I remember it doing was redefine family.

    That was a coalition deal and deliberately set up to fail – as was blatantly obvious by some of the totally inappropriate people who were appointed to it

    Politics is a dirty business that attracts schemers and plotters and those attracted to dirty back room deals and general scullduggery.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: