Home should be safe

Sweeping reforms to our laws will build a better system for combatting abuse and will reduce harm, say Justice Minister Amy Adams and Social Development Minister Anne Tolley.

The Government is proposing a broad overhaul of changes to family violence legislation, stemming from the comprehensive review of the 20-year old Domestic Violence Act.

“New Zealand’s rate of family violence is horrendous. It has a devastating impact on individuals and communities, and a profound impact that can span generations and lifetimes,” Ms Adams says.

“Our suite of changes are directed to earlier and more effective interventions. We are focused on better ways to keep victims safe and changing perpetrator behaviour to stop abuse and re-abuse.

“This is about redesigning the way the entire system prevents and responds to family violence. The reforms are an important part of building a new way of dealing with family violence.

“For many, family violence is an ingrained, intergenerational pattern of behaviour. There are no easy fixes. Our reforms make extensive changes across the Domestic Violence Act, Care of Children Act, Sentencing Act, Bail Act, Crimes Act, Criminal Procedure Act and the Evidence Act.”

Changes include:

  • getting help to those in need without them having to go to court
  • ensuring all family violence is clearly identified and risk information is properly shared
  • putting the safety of victims at the heart of bail decisions
  • creating three new offences of strangulation, coercion to marry and assault on a family member
  • making it easier to apply for a Protection Orders, allowing others to apply on a victim’s behalf, and better providing for the rights of children under Protection Orders
  • providing for supervised handovers and aligning Care of Children orders to the family violence regime
  • making evidence gathering in family violence cases easier for Police and less traumatic for victims
  • wider range of programmes able to be ordered when Protection Order imposed
  • making offending while on a Protection Order a specific aggravating factor in sentencing
  • enabling the setting of codes of practice across the sector.

“These changes are the beginning of a new integrated system but on their own have the potential to significantly reduce family violence. Changes to protection orders and the new offences alone are expected to prevent about 2300 violent incidents each year,” Ms Adams says.

The package makes changes to both civil and criminal laws, and provides system level changes to support new ways of working. It will cost $132 million over four years.

“Legislation is part of but not the whole change required. These legislative reforms are designed to support and drive the change underpinning the wider work programme overseen by the Ministerial Group on Family and Sexual Violence. The work is about comprehensive and coordinated system change with a focus on early intervention and prevention,” says Mrs Tolley.

“Social agencies and NGOs I’ve been speaking with are desperate for a system-wide change so we can make a real shift in the rate of family violence.”

“Laws alone cannot solve New Zealand’s horrific rate of family violence. But they are a cornerstone element in how we respond to confronting family violence. It sets up the system, holds perpetrators to account, and puts a stake in the ground,” Ms Adams says.

The full pack of reforms are set out in the Cabinet papers and are available atwww.justice.govt.nz/justice-sector-policy/key-initiatives/reducing-family-and-sexual-violence/safer-sooner

In a speech announcing the changes Prime Minister John Key said:

For most children, New Zealand is a great place to grow up.

We have a high quality education system, easy access to the outdoors and a strong culture of participation.

Most children can rely on the adults in their house, family and whanau for nurture, encouragement and support.

This helps those children to grow, flourish and be ready as adults to take advantage of all the opportunities that today’s world offers.

But we know that, unfortunately, that does not describe the growing-up that every child experiences.

For most New Zealanders, home is a sanctuary.

But for some, home can sometimes be the opposite.

It can be a place of fear, anxiety and danger. . . 

Today I want to focus on how we intend to address the harm in our society caused by repeated family violence.

This is usually, though not exclusively, perpetrated by men on their partners or former partners, and on one or more of their children.

Family violence isn’t only a problem for women and children, although it is less common, men can be victims too.

The issue isn’t one of gender or age. Violence is violence and it’s unacceptable no matter who is the perpetrator and who is the victim.

All New Zealanders wish family violence did not happen.

Many wish that those involved might just fix it themselves.

Some families do manage to improve their circumstances, but some do not.

They need help to stop the violence and repression so they can lead healthier, happier and more fulfilling lives.

Obviously, the most important reason to help is to protect victims from the pain, fear and consequences of living in a violent household.

The sooner we stop it, the better the chance of lives being saved and of injuries being avoided; and the better the chance of adults and children living with the confidence, security and opportunities that most New Zealanders take for granted.

In addition, the greater the reduction in family violence now, the greater the chance of it not blighting another generation.

New Zealanders generally resist government interference in their private lives, and I get that.

But let me say straight up that in households where anyone is being assaulted, threatened, intimidated, belittled or deprived, the perpetrator has no right to expect privacy so they can go on being a bully.

If they won’t stop that behaviour, and the victims can’t stop it, then we must ensure that someone else stops it.

Home should be the safest place for children and family the people who make and keep it that way but there are far too many children for whom home isn’t a sanctuary which is why the state and its agencies must step in.

We know the effects of this type of offending are cumulative and profound.

Children subjected to family violence, and those who witness it, are at risk of serious problems with their physical and mental health, poor educational and job outcomes, drug and alcohol abuse, and homelessness.

None of this will surprise any of you here today.

This audience knows that police respond to 110,000 family violence call-outs a year.

And you know that kids are present at nearly two-thirds of these incidents.

You also know that, tragically, nearly half of all homicides are acts of family violence.

We are all aware of terrible cases where a woman has predicted, “my ex is going to kill me”, and he has.

Victims, mostly women, are often trapped because their spouses or partners have isolated them, cut them off from support and finances, and undermined their confidence.

It’s easy to think this is someone else’s problem.

But it is not someone else’s problem if you are a New Zealander who cares.

That’s why Ministers have been working together to come up with a different and better approach to family violence to get different and better results.

Everyone knows there is no single answer and the Government cannot be all of the solution.

However, we have a key role.

We have resources when victims often do not.

And we have the ability to make laws laid down by Parliament and enforced by police.

That is quite different to the laws laid down by some guy in his own home, and enforced by him.

Today I am announcing an overhaul of the family violence prevention system.

Our new approach will revolve around intervening sooner, and more effectively.

That is because the sooner we can identify problems and get victims and perpetrators the help that they need to change their lives for the better, the fewer serious assaults there will be.

We have already started with a new Integrated Safety Response pilot that is running in Christchurch, and soon to get underway in the Waikato.

This has brought in the widest range of agencies to work together, share information, and assess and plan responses for every family violence notification to police.

It involves daily case triage, specialist high-risk case management, and help for perpetrators to get the services they need to change their behaviour.

We know we have developed a better way of working on behalf of the people who need us most.

It’s early days but we also know that at least one life has been saved.

The feedback so far gives us hope that with the dedication of those in the sector, and a new way of working together, we can reduce family violence across New Zealand.

That is our aim.

Justice Minister Amy Adams has been carrying out a legislative review over the past two years that has led to the changes I am outlining today.

We will create a legislative regime that is built on best practice and ensures high-risk domestic abuse can be recognised, recorded and responded to properly. . . 

 

These changes are by no means the end of creating the effective, prevention-focused system that we aspire to — but they will provide its essential building blocks.

It will take time for services to be redesigned to appropriately meet the needs of the range of victims and perpetrators of family violence, and for the necessary capacity to be built.

We also need to ensure these services are integrated with existing initiatives like children’s teams.

These changes have the potential to significantly reduce family violence.

The increase in protection orders alone is expected to lead to 1200 fewer violent offences each year.

The increased imprisonment of violent offenders is expected to prevent a further 1100 violent offences per year.

These will be significant gains.

We know that half of all young people exposed to family violence will themselves be on a benefit before they turn 19.

We know that boys who witness family violence are twice as likely to grow up to abuse their own partners and children.

We know the cost of such violence to individuals, families, neighbourhoods and our country.

So we also know that every step we take to reduce this level of harm is worthwhile.

I want to personally make a couple more points, very plainly.

First, I want to say to victims: you are not alone.

You deserve and are entitled to a life free from fear, and your children deserve and are entitled to that too. Help is available.

Secondly, to the perpetrators of this misery I say this: recognise what is going on in your home and take responsibility for it.

A good father, a good step-father and a good man does not hit, intimidate or control his spouse, partner, ex-partner or her children. The same goes for women who are abusers.

You do not create a better family by hitting them, belittling them, or by making them live in fear of you.

You do not own your spouse, your partner, your ex-partner, your children or your step-children.

If you act in a violent and controlling way, you can change that behaviour.

Own the problem.

Nothing will get better until you do.

Ask for help. There is no shame in that.

This audience knows that family violence is not restricted to the poorest communities, or only to violence by men against women.

A quarter of women who live in a home that earns over $100,000 a year have experienced physical or sexual violence from their partner.

Around one in four women with a university education have been assaulted.

20 per cent of all adults experience violence at the hands of their partner at some point in their lifetime.

Kids from abusive homes are three times more likely to end up in violent juvenile offending and three times more likely to try to take their own lives.

Just as the effects of family violence are widely felt, so is the challenge of reducing family violence widely shared — by the Government, the police, social agencies, families and by everyone who knows that violence is occurring, including those who are inflicting it.

None of us should be deterred by the difficulty of the problem. Rather we should be motivated by the positive difference we can make. . . 

 

So, increasing support in practical ways for those who need a hand has been a consistent theme of this Government and has been well supported by New Zealanders since we were first elected.

If this focus has surprised some commentators, it should not have.

In 2007, I stood up in the Burnside Rugby Clubrooms in Christchurch and made a speech about defining the sort of country I wanted New Zealand to be.

At the heart of that speech was the belief that every New Zealander deserves a fair chance in life.

A belief that all kids should have the kind of start that will enable them to make the most of their potential, and the most of the opportunities out there in the world today.

That does not mean that kids need to have everything.

No kid needs everything.

But they all need love, care and encouragement in order to flourish, and those can only be provided in homes where children feel safe and secure, because they are safe and secure.

Ministers in this Government are united in condemning abuse in the home.

All kinds of abuse.

Nothing justifies it. Nothing excuses it.

Succeeding in reducing family violence will save lives, and transform lives.

For some, it will feel like a new life.

There is so much to be gained.

This Government intends being part of the solution. I am sure you do too.

We have moved a long way from the bad old days when violence in the home was only a domestic but there are still homes which aren’t safe and families who live in fear of at least one of their family members.

Changing the law won’t make a difference by itself but it is part of the chain of change which must happen to help everyone whose homes aren’t the safe havens they should be.

 

7 Responses to Home should be safe

  1. Andrei says:

    You cannot legislate salvation – it cannot be done

    And bringing the Government into the lives of the dysfunctional usually exacerbates their problems and never fixes them

    Sorry but this is just doing something for the appearance of doing something.

    In any case the cynical part of me doubts the powers that be have a real interest in fixing this, rather the more dysfunctional families the better for them the more their power and control over people and their lives will grow

    We have never lived in a perfect world with perfect people and never will and no Government policy will make it happen

  2. homepaddock says:

    You’re right you can’t legislate salvation.

    From the speech: “Everyone knows there is no single answer and the Government cannot be all of the solution.”

    You say ” the cynical part of me doubts the powers that be have a real interest in fixing this, rather the more dysfunctional families the better for them the more their power and control over people and their lives will grow” – you’d be right with the parties of the left who like to increase dependence but National has put a lot of effort into reducing dependence.

    From the speech: “The sooner we stop it, the better the chance of lives being saved and of injuries being avoided; and the better the chance of adults and children living with the confidence, security and opportunities that most New Zealanders take for granted.

    In addition, the greater the reduction in family violence now, the greater the chance of it not blighting another generation.” That’s helping people live free of violence and fear which increases their chances of independence.

  3. Andrei says:

    I saw this on the News tonight

    And there were various women from various “NGO”s with an interest in this matter – they all said to a woman <i "we don't have enough resources" or words to that effect meaning money, taxpayers money

    Herein lies my difficulty, this is being turned into an industry, NGOs of all stripes are industries and therefore to thrive and prosper this industry needs domestic violence and will find it where ever they can and rewrite its definition

    I also know that every marriage has its rocky points and that good marriages work through them – but in those tricky bits, well something that maybe equated to “domestic violence” if the purpose suits may be observed if it serves the observers purpose.

    And if some external busybody with an axe to grind becomes involved matters which if left to the parties alone would have resolved in a positive and amicable way may end up with marriage and home torn apart.

    Human relations, particularly those between men and women are fraught and my interest is in strengthening marital bonds not providing more prison beds (this was mentioned on the news) to lock up people (men)

    There is an issue, its real – its a cultural one but it wont be solved by giving taxpayers dollars to ideologues and providing more prison beds

  4. homepaddock says:

    Andrei – there’s a world of difference between domestic violence which results in people being injured and killed or subjected to intimidation and other forms of mental abuse and the inevitable and normal rocky patches all relationships go through.

    If you read the speech you’ll see it acknowledges that some perpetrators of violence are women.

  5. Andrei says:

    there’s a world of difference between domestic violence which results in people being injured and killed or subjected to intimidation and other forms of mental abuse and the inevitable and normal rocky patches all relationships go through

    At the extreme end of the spectrum there is little argument but the definition of “domestic violence” becomes labile when it enters the political arena and when dealing with those with axes to grind who have a motivation to see it wherever they look

    The very real issue of people living in pathological relationships cannot be solved by speeches in Parliament and throwing taxpayers dollars at it

    In the words of the old song “we better, accentuate the positive / Eliminate the negative / Latch on to the affirmative”

    You know how strong I am on the institution of marriage – why are we not talking about building that up, creating an environment that fosters strong family bonds…

  6. Paul Scott says:

    progressive politics pure
    making it easier to apply for a Protection Orders, allowing others to apply on a victim’s behalf, and better providing for the rights of children under Protection Orders

    We do not need measures to make thee orders easier. They already are made ex parte, quickly and easily. The problem with them is that any claim of violence becomes ipso facto actual violence, and that allows a degree of misuse of the provisions.
    Guilty, and no cases to answer, or enter .
    Note also that a claim becomes a fact and then follows that ” perpetrator” continually. The clean slate does not apply.
    An emotionally jacked up violence allegation can and will follow a man for ever. And that is not uncommon.

  7. Paul Scott says:

    It has been an industry for a long time Andrei.
    In the mid to late eighties the feminazi regime was at its most savage. You could drive along the road and see slogans painted up “All men are rapists”
    There were articles in the Press that one woman or girl in four was sexually molested by a man [ not a stranger ]. They had telethons about it to raise money. They had more photos in the paper of evil looking men leaning over their children in bed.
    The mental health foundation said we were even worse than the feminazi claims. It was hysteria.
    Matrimonial breakdown saw women automatically denoted the necessary caregiver / custodial parent / and it was common practice to accuse the man of being violent / alcoholic/ and often sexually abusive of the children.
    Those claims were accepted and ipso facto on the basis of risk prevention and men were destroyed.

    I joined the men’s movement. It was insane. One man we knew committed suicide. We were told that even to defend a matrimonial case was abuse in itself.
    After a while Judges began to find out that overseas research showed that that families without fathers were catastrophic in many cases. Until then they would blithely tell us that a man was an extra in a family.
    They eventually changed the law so there was no preferred parent for the children, and Judges started giving dual custody.
    But feminazi fought back. it wanted more and more violence against the violence, and that is what it achieved.

    Key is a drip really. You will hear lots of this feel good, but meaningless legislation up to the 2017 elections

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: