Doing a lot or doing little

Prime Minister John Key presented his statement to parliament yesterday.

It included a list of the government’s achievements to date and plans for the next three years.

The PM doesn’t have to stick to that script in the House:

Prime Minister John Key kicked off the debate by taking aim at Labour leader Andrew Little. He had counted his calendar and discovered Mr Little had now been leader for 84 days. “In 1873, Jules Verne thought he could get around the world in 80 days. Well, in 84 days, Andrew Little hasn’t even got around his caucus. He hasn’t even got around the four people who voted for him.” He announced Mr Little had had the grand total of two ideas in that time: Maori sovereignty and the Future of Work Commission. “He’s going to hold a workshop about what a job is. That is a novel concept for a Labour MP, I’m prepared to admit that.”

“He isn’t Andrew Little. He’s Dr Do-Little,” Key crowed, clearly quite stoked with his own wit. . .

That’s the difficulty an Opposition faces.

The government can put its plan and put its plan into action. The Opposition can plan lots but do little and most of what it does do is negative – opposing what the government’s doing.

So while Labour and the others on the opposition benches carp about house prices, will they support the government’s plans to reform the RMA to reduce the time and cost of building new dwellings?

Of course not.

While the government is acting, the opposition is left doing little.
Today I challenged the opposition to stop simply talking about housing affordability and to support the Government as we do something about it.

27 Responses to Doing a lot or doing little

  1. ” Key crowed, clearly quite stoked with his own wit”

    The very behaviour you all claim to despise here, but in your Key-hero, you adore!

    “Key crowed, clearly quite stoked with his own wit”

    Quite.

    Like

  2. “In Key’s opening speech he forgot to mention that Little is a lawyer and that he is the right Labour leader at the right time.”

    Treetop on The Standard
    http://thestandard.org.nz/nrt-parliamentary-privilege-vs-suppression-orders/#comments

    Like

  3. ‘That’s the difficulty the Opposition faces”, you write, Ele.

    The National Government is facing a huge problem too, as evidenced yesterday in the House by the Speaker’s intervention at the point where Mr Little described a police investigation. Little didn’t contravene any rules of Parliament, and I’ve not broken any of your rules here in mentioning the issue, but it’s big and it’s looming, isn’t it Ele.

    Like

  4. Other “difficulties faced by” National – Sky City:

    Campbell Live @CampbellLiveNZ
    Follow
    We received 10,000 text votes for tonight’s poll question and the consensus was pretty clear: 3% YES – 97% NO

    97% say NO to Key giving Sky City taxpayer money (our money) to make it shinier and glitzier!
    97%

    That’s not looking good for Mr Key and his gamble on gambling, is it!

    On topic, Ele, I’m on topic. In your image above, Key talks about “the Government’s agenda” and Sky City is slap-bang in the middle of that. And it’s looking like a dog.

    Like

  5. farmerbraun's avatar farmerbraun says:

    John Key was , perhaps inadvertently, channelling David Lange. Definitely playing to the gallery though.

    Like

  6. Andrei's avatar Andrei says:

    Sigh I came here looking for signs of intelligent life

    Three comments Robert?

    Anyway Mz Trevitt is doing us a real disservice by writing a revue of bad standup comedy from Parliament that reads like it comes from the entertainment section of the paper – something I never read myself.

    There are many substantive issues to discuss, including this taken from Mr Key’s speech buried so deep within so it will be missed by the average New Zealand sheep who prefer it seems to wallow in bad jokes made at the expense of those who belong to another tribe

    The Government is also considering New Zealand’s response to the threat posed by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. This brutal group is a threat, not only to stability in the Middle East, but regionally and locally too. The Government’s response to ISIL will cover areas such as humanitarian assistance, diplomatic efforts, intelligence and capacity building. A decision will be made in the coming weeks about a potential military training contribution.

    We are sleepwalking into a major war,a catastrophe that will see much human suffering and our sons coming home in body bags labeled body parts missing

    Like

  7. farmerbraun's avatar farmerbraun says:

    Andrei, I think that it is widely known that almost everything JK parrotted in your quote can charitably be described as spin. More accurately , it is of course a “big lie”.
    However I do not share your pessimism about a major war, with the proviso that every war is “major” for the participants, more especially those who do not survive it.

    I think that the Middle East situation will pale into insignificance when the full impact of the loomimg global financial disaster is fully felt.

    Like

  8. farmerbraun's avatar farmerbraun says:

    “looming ” , of course.

    Like

  9. Andrei's avatar Andrei says:

    I think that the Middle East situation will pale into insignificance when the full impact of the loomimg global financial disaster is fully felt.

    True farmerbraun, but the two things are not unrelated but are different aspects of the same.

    We live an absolutely extraordinary life in the West, which we take for granted blissfully unaware that it all paid for with borrowed money for which there is no collateral

    Like

  10. Farmerbraun says Key lied in the House. Farmerbraun expects a global financial crisis.
    I’m liking the cut of this man’s jib.
    Andrei is, of course, correct. However, a blog like this is not just for discussing the big issues. It also serves to entertain and to chatter about other issues. You’ll have noticed, Andrei, that Ele posts all sorts of “minor” issues for us to discuss. Claiming that any talk other than war is for the unintelligent insults everyone here, including our gracious and forgiving host. There’s room for all sorts of discussion. Sabin’s situation is very interesting in a lot of ways and it wouldn’t kill you to offer an opinion, as you have on many other issues.

    Like

  11. farmerbraun's avatar farmerbraun says:

    ” but the two things are not unrelated but are different aspects of the same.”

    I agree. Currently, there are far too many people with nothing to lose by placing their lives on the line.
    But this is entirely to be expected given the manipulation that has completely destroyed the basic condition which is required for capitalism to operate.

    Like

  12. farmerbraun's avatar farmerbraun says:

    Robert , I am sure that JK will be delighted if you continue to “play up” the distraction that is Sabin. You make his job so much easier.

    Like

  13. “Currently, there are far too many people with nothing to lose by placing their lives on the line.”

    They could lose their lives. Their lives are “nothing” you reckon?
    Fatalistic and nihilistic thinking. There is always hope. In any case, they’ll have people at home, here in New Zealand. They’ll not want their children, brothers and sisters to lose their lives.

    Like

  14. Northern's avatar Northern says:

    Robert can become so boring – but I do agree with him on the Sky City debacle.

    Like

  15. Sorry to bore, Northern.
    Pete George (even more boring than me) is commenting on Sabin.
    He’s not afraid to talk about the issue.

    “Damage control leak on Sabin raises more questions”

    http://yournz.org/2015/02/11/damage-control-leak-on-sabin-raises-more-questions/

    “If ministers knew something in August why wasn’t this investigated by National?

    Journalists and people with strong National connections knew before the end of November. It’s hard to believe no one in Nationals caucus or ikn John key’s office knew any more about it for another three months.

    At best it would seem to be wilful ignorance, closing their eyes and ears to something they didn’t want to know about, for political convenience.

    This controlled looking leak effectively slams the blame on the Police, but it still looks very suspiciously like trying to prop up some stories that have struggled with their credibility.

    It’s prudent to be highly suspicious of leaked stories like this, they are likely to be very carefully constructed single sides to a story.”

    Like

  16. Andrei's avatar Andrei says:

    It also serves to entertain and to chatter about other issues. You’ll have noticed, Andrei, that Ele posts all sorts of “minor” issues for us to discuss.

    At the risk of allowing you to sidetrack this thread into yet another discussion of yourself I note you never for example participate in things like the Thursday quiz, one of my favourite features of this blog

    However this thread is about John Key’s address to Parliament yesterday and it is an aspect of that I chose to comment upon, rather than splatter the thread with multiple comments on diverse topics not pertaining to the content of that speech

    Like

  17. Dave Kennedy's avatar Dave Kennedy says:

    It seems the Salvation Army have real questions about the Government’s performance around children and housing. Also there are questions about the honesty around the reporting of crime and concerns about the Ministry of Education refusing to provide basic data.
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/66019667/child-poverty-progess-fails-salvation-army-says

    I am concerned that the Salvation Army will have their funding cut like the Government has done to other organisations that have questioned them or threatened the profits of their business mates:

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/manawatu-standard/opinion/8905733/Funding-for-refuge-insufficient

    http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/239533/problem-gambling-decision-questioned

    Like

  18. farmerbraun's avatar farmerbraun says:

    Robert ….. read . . . think …compose … re-read . . . review reply . . . .respond . . . . proofread . . .post.

    Your replied to something that I didn’t say with an ad hominem.

    Like

  19. farmerbraun's avatar farmerbraun says:

    Dave the supply of “funding ” i.e. other people’s money , is ALWAYS insufficient.

    Like

  20. Andrei – I have taken part in Ele’s quiz at various times, and enjoyed it. Generally though, I leave you and the others who like to contribute to answering the quiz, in peace to enjoy it. As Northern says, I can be so boring.
    And yes, we ought to keep to the topic. Key mentioned his agenda in his speech and Sky City is right there, making the news and on Key’s agenda. It looks like a real dog though.

    Like

  21. Dave Kennedy's avatar Dave Kennedy says:

    fb, I agree, and funding should be needs and performance based. The cuts to Women’s Refuge and the Problem Gambling Foundation were clearly political decisions as both had high levels of performance and served clear needs. When one looks at where cuts are occurring and where new money is being spent (Wanganui Collegiate’s $3 million against Ministry advice) it becomes much clearer what influences this Government.

    Like

  22. “the entertainment section of the paper – something I never read myself.”

    “things like the Thursday quiz, one of my favourite features of this blog”

    ?

    Like

  23. Andrew Welsh 19
    11 February 2015 at 8:45 am
    “I am a National voter, the idea currently being discussed (nothing committed as I write) to commit ratepayers $ is unpalatable to the majority of National supporters. If JK/SJ go ahead and pay SkyCity then this may well be a defining moment in the 3rd term government.”

    The Standard
    http://thestandard.org.nz/skys-playing-us-for-suckers/#comments

    Like

  24. Mr E's avatar Mr E says:

    “On topic, Ele, I’m on topic.”

    Funniest thing I have heard all day.

    Like

  25. TraceyS's avatar TraceyS says:

    Andrei, Robert comes to this blog to irritate. He has said so in comments on his own blog. In participating in the Thursday Quiz, the only way he could further his objective would be to ace the regulars. I seriously doubt that would be likely.

    Like

  26. As said on twitter:

    “That weird moment when Labour, the Greens and the Taxpayers Union are all on the same side #skycity”

    Ha! The Taxpayer’s Union – two people! Funny as hell.

    Like

  27. Still, the Sky City con is bugger*d!

    Like

Leave a comment