Crude, simplistic, unsustainable

Federated Farmers says Local Government New Zealand’s discussion paper has highlighted the need to end reliance on the current property-value based rating system.

Federated Farmers local government spokesperson Katie Milne says continuing to set rates based on the value of a property is a crude and simplistic tool which is unsustainable.

“Farmers find themselves paying for services they don’t or can’t use.  In effect, the current rating system means farmers are subsidising people who live in towns,” Katie Milne says.

“Local government in many cases is suffering a decline in its population from which to draw rates.  This problem then gets passed onto farmers who find rates becoming an increasingly spiralling proportion of their farm costs.”

But Katie Milne says the discussion paper is timely in its pointing to more equitable and efficient rating systems.

“We like the attention given to expanding the existing revenue system, such as in user charges.  This is clearly a fairer and more flexible way of at least part funding local government activities.”

“There should also be a look at institutions which are rates exempt, yet which use council services.”

“Local bodies need to get a more robust way of deciding both their rating and spending.  The Long Term Plan process for councils helps, but is not the full answer.”

Katie Milne says there needs to be a close look at how central government imposes new rate burdens on local government.

“It’s the easiest thing in the world for a government to keep taxes down by shoving the cost down the chain to local councils.  But if they are going to do that then they need to help by paying for it out of income tax and GST income.”

Successive governments have imposed more costs on local government.

But there are many other factors which have led to rates increasing year after year at rates much higher than inflation.

The burden of that has spread more unevenly in rural areas where a property-value ratings system falls more heavily on farms.

However, I think councils unwillingness to rein in their spending is more of a problem than the rating system.

One Response to Crude, simplistic, unsustainable

  1. Gravedodger. says:

    If Local Government stuck to their core responsibilities of roading, refuse, water sewage etc then property value based rating would remain fair and as equitable as any other system of funding.
    When the traipse off into empire building and social feel good matters then the bulk of the consumers and beneficiaries are not captured by the funding model, that is when it becomes a grossly unfair system.

    As an example my service club has a small marquee that exceeds an arbitrary 100 square meters and therefore requires a “permit” for every erection that costs us a Christchurch City Council “Fee” of $500.
    A couple of glaring inconsistencies in that as time has moved on very few “erections” are ever inspected.
    Next door Selwyn District Council can fulfill the nonsense of the “permit” for $250.
    If the “tent” was 99 square meters then we would be free to kill as many patrons as we could fit in to it and nobody gives a proverbial.

    What started out as a community service has now been gathered into the bureaucratic purse seine net of the “peoples republic”. at a cost to the struggling self help efforts of citizens.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: