Labour’s CGT no good – NZIER

A report by the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER) reinforces Federated Farmers concerns over Labour’s proposed capital gains tax:

“The NZIER say the Labour Party’s proposed Capital Gains Tax would not be a good addition to New Zealand’s tax mix as it is proposed, we agree,” says Dr William Rolleston, Federated Farmers President.

“The nature of politics will see the Labour Party try to dismiss the NZIER report.  Yet they must listen to the message because the messenger is credible.

“We commissioned the NZIER to examine Labour’s CGT proposal since it represents a major change to New Zealand’s tax system and has been devoid of critical analysis. 

“Perhaps the most concerning aspect of the report comes down to the Labour Party’s revenue assumptions.  In 2011, the Labour Party estimated a 15 percent capital gains tax would raise $17.5 million in its first year, rising to $3.7 billion by 2026.

“The NZIER tell us these estimates are high, since the revenue potential of its proposed CGT is more likely to be half that sum.  In fact it may be smaller.  If this key policy is out by such a margin it asks fundamental questions about the Party’s shadow budget. 

“What’s more, the Labour Party’s estimates of CGT revenue were revised up this year.  The NZIER noting Labour’s “…2014 estimates are less believable than the 2011 estimates.”

“Labour also expects to raise at least $1.3 billion from the farming sector but a more realistic estimate is half that sum in 15 years’ time.  NZIER further estimates that the loss in current farm values will be between $2.4 billion and $7.6 billion.  But this will be a one off hit for farmers.

“Lower land values mean lower tax revenue too.

“Aside from simply delaying sale, the NZIER notes there would be significant opportunities to avoid taxable ‘realisation’ events by keeping assets in the family. The CGT tax proposed would not treat transfers to family members as events where capital gains are assessed.

“A CGT genuinely risks capital lock-in with the housing market.  To avoid taxable gains people will choose not to sell achieving the opposite of what is desired for productive investment.

“Since the housing market has been part of a CGT’s rationale, the NZIER found Labour’s CGT will not aid affordability and is not as progressive as many would like to think.  Indeed, a CGT may lead to higher rents. 

“What is more, speculative property investment is already subject to income tax on capital gains.

“The lesson we can draw from countries with a CGT is that they are not immune from rising house prices, indeed, two weeks ago, the Sydney Morning Herald reported that Sydney and Melbourne had their strongest winter price surge since 2007.

“Federated Farmers, NZIER and others like Victoria University’s Tax Working Group agree that a CGT, of the kind proposed by the Labour Party, would not be an efficient and effective option,” Dr Rolleston concluded.

The party has criticised the criticism to which  Feds replied:

The New Zealand Labour Party has issued a media release calling into question the efficacy of the report authored by the New Zealand Institute of Economic Research (NZIER).

Federated Farmers notes the NZIER details Victoria University’s Tax Working Group consideration that a CGT, of the kind proposed by the Labour Party, would not be an efficient and effective option going forward.

This media statement confirms that the NZIER stands by its report and Federated Farmers deliberately selected an independent organisation to prepare the CGT report.

The NZIER report was issued to generate discussion on what could become a major change to New Zealand’s taxation base. In doing so, it casts doubt about Labour’s revenue projections and assumptions about the capital gains tax.

The Federation believes it is incumbent on the Labour Party to release detailed calculations supporting the basis for its policy allowing independent scrutiny ahead of the General Election.

Particularly, the analytical basis underpinning the Labour Party’s estimates of CGT revenue, which were revised upwards earlier this year.

The comments we have read do not represent the report NZIER wrote . . . 

Other objections raised by the Labour Party are reflective of debates around the world, in which the Labour Party holds a different philosophical view.

The NZIER fully stands behind its key findings and messages.

 

A simple and comprehensive CGT which was combined with lower personal and company taxes might work.

Labour’s is complicated, has several exclusions and is in addition to existing taxes.

It won’t do anything to cool the housing market, will distort investment and reduce the reward from risk taking and hard work.

3 Responses to Labour’s CGT no good – NZIER

  1. Mr E says:

    Well done federated farmers.

    Like

  2. murray grimwood says:

    Federated Farmers wouldn’t know manure from clay.

    And you can quote me.

    They’re a short-term, short-sighted, spin-emitting edifice, and their activity is summed up in one word:

    Unsustainable.

    Do you know about doubling-time and EROEI and stuff like that, Mr E?

    Like

  3. Bingo Bob says:

    Grow your own food do you Murray? If not then just consider that you are involved in agriculture..the last step in the chain is eating..everyone is guilty of it no matter how much they hate farmers. Thank god there are some out there. I need one every day.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: