Normal for whom?

The depraved behaviour of the self-titled Roast Busters isn’t regarded that way by their friends:

Female friends of the Roast Busters have spoken out in support of the boys accused of having group sex with intoxicated underage girls.

The girls, aged between 16 and 19, are standing by their friends, saying their behaviour is nothing more than normal teen antics.

“They are good guys,” said one. “They can make really dumb decisions but they are being teenagers.

“What they are doing is very wrong… they should not have put this on Facebook. They wanted to be famous, they got their fame but in the worst possible way.”

But the girls, who do not wish to be named, claim the bravado we’ve seen from the Roast Busters is just that – even though police believe the group may have exploited a number of drunk, underage victims.

“People know that they are Roast Busters and they go hang out with them and do stuff [… ] but they’re not rapists, they’re cool dudes.” . . .

The female friends of the Roast Busters told 3 News that Facebook anarchy is now the norm, so too is drunken “group sex”.

“People send it on Snapchat, who cares […] it’s normal in west Auckland, its normal here […] Not for everybody though it’s just the young ones 13- to 15-year-olds – that’s what they do.” . . .

Normal for whom?

Not anyone with an appreciation of what’s right and wrong.

Not anyone who understands that actions have consequences.

Not anyone with respect for themselves and other people.

3 Responses to Normal for whom?

  1. Andrei says:

    No point wringing your hands over this – the rot starts at the top.

    To be fair Mr Key seems like a decent fellow who behaves appropriately but you cannot say the same of his predecessor, now can you?

    And we have the current Auckland mayoralty soap opera – do we not?

    As ye sow so shall ye reap

  2. Andrei says:

    We are actually living in a time where our elites have literally gone insane!

    On one hand there is all this tearing of hair over the behaviour of young kids – 14 years old when this started, if you read beyond the headlines and everyone is appalled.

    But at the same time taxpayers are funding the doling out of condoms by government employed apparatchiks to fricking 13 year old kids What do you ninnies think condoms are for – duh?

    You people have created this sewer, this squalid, degenerate society don’t bother crying about the consequences because it suits your political agendas and you get to pass new laws because it is gross hypoocrisy.


  3. JC says:

    In fact the stats show that teen drinking 18-21 has decreased since 1980, 18-21 alcohol related crime has dropped significantly and teen solo mums have likewise declined.

    If we dug up some more stats I think we’d find that this teen cohort is pretty good.

    What we’re looking at here is aberrant behaviour and simply not representative of the cohort at all.

    The major change is that the NZ median age has moved from the late 20s to the late 30s and we now less tolerant of the sexual predators of earlier generations.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: