Irrigation makes a difference

Yesterday’s discussion on irrigation brought up the topic of wheat.

This is wheat from a North Otago farm, one crop was irrigated, the other wasn’t:

 Peter Mitchell's wheat crop in North Otago. Proving the potential of irrigation.

North Otago has an average annual rainfall of around 20 inches but it can be as low as 13 inches in a drought.

Without irrigation, farms had big losses in bad years, caught up in good ones then got hit by another bad one.

That didn’t just have an impact on the farms, it affected businesses which relied on them and the wider community.

Now we’ve got enough critical mass of irrigation farmers know they can grow grass and crops even in the worst years.

The positive benefits from that include more jobs and higher incomes.

The Waiareka Creek which used to be a series of stagnant ponds now flows all year.

North Otago Irrigation Company’s requirement for all shareholders to have independently audited environmental farm plans ensures that soil and water quality are safe guarded.

Last year’s drought affected not only the areas which didn’t have enough rain it impacted the national economy.

There is potential for more irrigation in North Otago and other areas.

The benefits of realising that potential are not just economic, they’re environmental and social too.

#gigatownoamaru appreciates that.

4 Responses to Irrigation makes a difference

  1. Quintin Hogg says:

    It’s good to see that irrigation is improving productivity in the Waitaki Valley. #gigatownoamaru needs the economic boost as does places like Fairlie and Waimate.
    When I travelled about the place in my youth it could get pretty arid at times so from my POV irrigation is a positive.


  2. Andrei says:

    It is only people who have no concept of the true horrors of famine that don’t appreciate the blessings that agricultural technologies can bring – and we know the sort of people who put empty ideology above pragmatism with their theories about sustainability yadda yadda – they are actually intellectual heirs of STALIN


  3. robertguyton says:

    Of course plants like wheat in arid areas grow better when irrigated but the picture is bigger than that.
    What suffers from irrigation? Have you described and accounted for those things?


    That’s one-eyed and irresponsible, in my view. Let’s hear your discussion around environmental effects.


  4. Mr E says:

    Robert is right. Negatives need to be considered.

    Are there any credible views on the negatives of irrigation? Anyone?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: