Smaller boards generally better

Tertiary Education, Skills and Employment Minister Steven Joyce has released the Draft Tertiary Education Strategy.

It aims to improve the way tertiary education supports achievement, industry, innovation, and economic growth.

. . . The draft strategy contains six strategic priorities: delivering skills for industry; 
getting at-risk young people into a career; boosting achievement of Māori and Pasifika; improving adult literacy and numeracy; growing international linkages; and strengthening research-based institutions.

“Tertiary education is a passport to success. Developing strong links with employers will help ensure students have the skills they need to succeed. This in turn will increase employment, boost incomes and help grow the New Zealand economy,” Mr Joyce says.

“We are seeing increased competition from around the world both for skilled graduates and leading academics, in particular from developing nations. For New Zealand to remain internationally competitive, our tertiary institutions need to ensure their relevance in the modern workplace, expand their research links and connections with industry, attract more international students, and invest more in disciplines where they have a competitive advantage.”

More people are attending tertiary institutions and gaining qualifications which is good.

But not all those qualifications make it any easier for graduates to get jobs and employers often find a mismatch between qualifications and what businesses need.

Education has a wider role than providing meal-tickets for graduates but many students seek qualifications as a means to getting a job and in the hope it will help theme earn more. They, and potential employers, are not well served

The Minister also announced plans to reduce the size of university and  wananga councils:

“New Zealand universities would benefit from smaller, more flexible councils which support them to perform at a high level and to be nimbler, more adaptable, and better organised than big overseas universities. . .

The proposed changes would:

  • Decrease the size of university and wānanga councils from 12 to 20 members to eight to 12 members.
  • Make council membership requirements more flexible by removing specific representative requirements.
  • Require the Minister and councils to appoint members with governance capability.
  • Clarify the duties and accountabilities of individual council members.

There would be no change to the settings for the appointment of council chairpersons and deputy chairpersons, which are currently made by councils themselves. University and Wananga Councils would also be free to retain representative positions for different stakeholder groups if they wished. . .

Staff and students oppose this plan.

Mr Joyce says the councils need to be smaller so they can make decisions faster.

He says the institutions themselves should decide if students and staff should be represented.

However, student leaders say that is not good enough. They say their place at the table, and that of staff, should be guaranteed.

Victoria University of Wellington Students’ Association president Rory McCourt says the Government is showing it does not value students.

The Tertiary Education Union says the proposal treats universities and wananga as if they are businesses, and their wider role in society will be lost if councils are cut back.

However, Canterbury University is already seeking a smaller council, saying it wants to improve its decision-making by going from 20 members to 12, including staff and student representatives.

The plan doesn’t prevent staff and student representation on councils, it just makes it optional.

I am amazed that councils have been operating with 20 members.

A governing body that big would be cumbersome and expensive to run.

Eight to 12 members would still allow wide representation and a range of views and experience, including staff and students if the council deemed that beneficial.

In my experience smaller boards are generally better ones enabling more input from all members which promotes better discussion and better decisions.

14 Responses to Smaller boards generally better

  1. Roger says:

    The same logic could apply to District and Regional Councils – smaller and better qualified for the decisions expected. The ECan model with 7 commissioners is a good exemplar.

    Like

  2. Armchair Critic says:

    The ECan example is one of democracy being overturned and people being disenfranchised. It’s that kind of thing we apply sanctions for when it happens in neighbouring countries, like Fiji.

    Like

  3. robertguyton says:

    To use Right-wing logic for a moment – if smaller is better and 7 is better than 12, why not 1 (or I should say, One)?

    Like

  4. Armchair Critic says:

    Exactly. We could do away with democracy and appoint a PM for life. That would be more efficient and provide a lot more certainty. If it’s good enough for North Korea, surely we can follow their lead. The only question is should we do it now, or wait for the result of the next election?

    Like

  5. homepaddock says:

    That would mean by left-wing logic (surely an oxymoron?), if 20 is good, 40 would be better.

    The adjective I used was smaller not small nor smallest.

    Like

  6. Armchair Critic says:

    Taking the idea you are mocking to its extreme we end up with participatory democracy, which I think is an excellent idea. We are, as a species, many generations away from being ready for it.
    Your post was not about local government, it was about your support for the government’s plan to disenfranchise a couple of important groups of people at universities; another post in your ongoing “I hate democracy” series.

    Like

  7. robertguyton says:

    Why does Ele hate democracy so, do you think?
    Is she a’feared of it, new-fangled contraption that it is, and so messy!

    Like

  8. homepaddock says:

    I’m with Churchill: “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.”

    Note he said government not governance. Democracy doesn’t require everyone to be represented on every board.

    Do you know if all university council members are elected? My understanding – and do correct me if I’m wrong – is that at least some are appointed.

    Like

  9. robertguyton says:

    So, Ele, you don’t think democratic representation is important for university and wananga councils.
    Figures.

    Like

  10. Andrei says:

    Duh – living proof of how dimwitted green supporters are – well they’d have to be anybody with a reading comprehension greater than the average 12 year old wouldn’t fall for Green BS

    And your last comment, Robert Guyton, displays the reading comprehension level of a dull seven year old

    Like

  11. robertguyton says:

    Hi Andrei! The ol’ bunions playing up tonight?

    Like

  12. Armchair Critic says:

    Hi Robert. I’ve observed that when Andrei disagrees with something but can’t find a reasonable argument, he resorts to a personal attack. Usually it’s about intelligence. It’s all quite predictable and says much more about Andrei than it does about the person he is attacking.
    Ele, do you think that the changes to the structure of the Labour party, strengthening its internal democracy, have been good for the party, or bad? Your thoughts on the same question, if you care to consider it, but looking forward, would be interesting too.

    Like

  13. homepaddock says:

    I’m taking a generous approach to whether this question is on-topic.

    A party that gives power, and votes, to groups (unions in this case) at the cost of individuals has a strange view of democracy.

    In spite of that opening the leadership vote to members, albeit their votes count for less than those of unions and caucus, has reportedly increased membership.

    The requirement for a leadership vote after the election could cause problems in the future. If there’s any doubt over the leader the threat that s/he could be dumped will be used against the party in campaigns.

    Like

  14. Armchair Critic says:

    Thanks Ele. Have a good weekend. 🙂

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: