It’s protein but . . .

September 5, 2013

I have no compunction about eating animal protein.

We rarely do home kills but it doesn’t worry me eating something we’ve raised, unless it was a pet.

Protein is protein but I draw the line at eating something I’ve known by name.

This view is based on the normal run of the mill farmed protein varied with a little of the wild sort if someone’s been hunting.

I’ve never knowingly  been faced with the dilemma  of eating protein not regarded as usual fare here though acceptable in other countries.

Though there was a bar well away from the usual tourist traps in Nadi where we could hear dogs barking outside until a few minutes before our meal arrived and we did wonder if that was just coincidence.

Would I knowingly eat dog? My head tells me it’s just protein but my heart and stomach aren’t quite so open to the thought of eating it.

Maybe that explains why my first reaction to this story was one of sympathy for the dogs.

A dog meat vendor in Hunan province died after accidentally shooting himself with a poisoned dart fired from a crossbow that he used to kill dogs, mainland media reported.

The man was reportedly demonstrating how to use the toxic dart to other members of his meat-selling operation in June, when the crossbow went off and hit him in the leg, and he died on his way to hospital, several mainland media outlets said. . .



September 5, 2013

Only 5/10 in today’s Money week quiz.

Word of the day

September 5, 2013

Smouch – a slobbery smacking kiss; to smutch; to soil; a dark soil or stain; to pilfer, steal, take without permission.

Thanks Met Service

September 5, 2013

Members of the Pastoral management Group, to which we belong, shared experiences of June’s snow storms.

Everyone paid tribute to warnings from the Met Service which allowed stock to be moved and preparations made, both of which minimised the damage done.

Met Service has been equally accurate with its forecasts for the last few days. Thanks to that farmers and orchardists were able to prepare for the polar blast which reminded us yet again that the weather doesn’t observe the calendar.

August was mild but we’ve had a cold start to September about which Met Service warned us. I can see fresh snow on the Kakanui Range from my kitchen window and the temperatures are more wintry than spring-like.

Weather forecasting is not an exact science and we only ever know if forecasts are right after the event.

We’re quick to complain when they get it wrong but on these two occasions, Met Service was right when it mattered and their forecasts made a difference.

Rural round-up

September 5, 2013

Biological industries big winners – Hugh Stringleman:

Nitrate leaching, sheep milking, and new hops and beers were among the diverse research proposals that have attracted medium-term, contestable Government funding, Hugh Stringleman found out.

Biological industries have received 80% of the Government’s 2013 allocation of contestable research funding and the proposed Lincoln Hub has been conspicuously successful.

Lincoln Hub partners AgResearch, DairyNZ, Landcare Research, Lincoln University, and Plant & Food Research secured grants totalling $133 million for 21 new research projects. . .

Genotyping chip a milestone for sheep industry:

An international team has developed a powerful new tool that can be used to test a sheep’s genetics and predict its productivity and meat quality.

FarmIQ in conjunction with Illumina and the International Sheep Genomics Consortium (ISGC) are have announced completion of the “Ovine Infinium® HD SNP BeadChip”.

This new chip is capable of identifying up to 600,000 points across the sheep genome (otherwise known as single nucleotide polymorphisms or SNPs). It is one of the first high-density chips developed for sheep and follows the release in January 2009 of the OvineSNP50 BeadChip, which can identify over 50,000 points. . .

Zespri wins top award in Asia for marketing:

Zespri has been recognised for the quality of its marketing programmes across Asia at the inaugural Asia Fruit Awards in Hong Kong.

Zespri’s president of global sales and marketing Dan Mathieson was presented with the Marketing Campaign of the Year award at the Asia Fruit Awards, which were presented by Asiafruit Magazine and Asia Fruit Logistica as part of the annual Asia Fruit Logistica and Asiafruit Congress event.

Asia Fruit Logistica is the leading trade exhibition for Asian fresh produce business and is attended by about 6000 buyers and trade visitors from more than 60 countries. . .

Research to look at pasture production and profitability:

New researchby AgResearch will get down to the grass roots, or more accurately, clover roots of New Zealand farming.

A $7 million programme aims to increase pasture production and profitability by improving the ability of legumes such as white clover to fix nitrogen in the soil.

Bacteria called rhizobia, which live in the nodules on clover roots, are an essential part of that nitrogen-fixing process.

The natural nitrogen supplied into pastures in this way has been referred to as New Zealand’s competitive advantage in farm production. . .

Bacterial toxins harnessed for bioinsecticides and medicine:

New Zealand and Australian scientists have found a new way in which bacteria store and release toxins, and their discovery may be harnessed to develop new bioinsecticides for crop pests and even new medicines.
The team, led by Dr Shaun Lott from AgResearch and The University of Auckland and Dr Mark Hurst at AgResearch in Lincoln, studied how the bacterium Yersinia entomophaga kills crop pests such as grass grubs, diamondback moths and porina caterpillars. . .

Ballance user testing “more sophisticated” nutrient technology:

Farmers will soon have a tool to help them deal with areas of the farm that are more likely to be the source of nutrient losses.

The emerging technology from Ballance Agri-Nutrients is one of the initial outcomes of the co-operative’s research and development programme, which is being co-funded by the Government’s Primary Growth Partnership.

User testing and validation is now underway for the “precision decision” model, which will give farmers access to information about how they can reduce nutrient losses while getting the best response from their fertiliser use, says Ballance’s Research and Development Manager, Warwick Catto. . .

Thursday’s quiz

September 5, 2013

1. Who said: There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats.?

2. By what name was the singer Yusuf Islam before he converted to Islam?

3. It’s chouchou in French, beniamino in Italian, mascota in Spanish and poti  in Maori, what is it in englishE

4. What is ailurophobe?

5. Cat, dog, other, no pet at all?

NZ up good, Aust down bad

September 5, 2013

More good news. We're on the right track.

For the first time in the history of the World Economic Forum’s competitiveness index, New Zealand is ranked higher than Australia.

New Zealand has outperformed Australia on the latest Global Competitiveness Index for the first time, according to an annual report compiled by the World Economic Forum.

New Zealand climbed five places from last year to come in at 18th on the overall ranking of global competitiveness, while Australia slipped one place to drop out of the top 20 for the first time with a score of 21.

The annual Global Competitiveness Report is compiled from 111 indicators, categorised into 12 pillars of competitiveness in four main sub-indices: basic requirements, efficiency enhancers, and innovation and sophistication factors.

Dr Oliver Hartwich, Executive Director of the New Zealand Initiative – which helped compile the survey data – said the improvement reflected the steady recovery of the local economy and prudent pro-growth policies that have been put in place to support it, helping New Zealand hold its competitive ground while other countries slipped back amid a weaker global growth outlook.

That contrasted with Australia, which is New Zealand’s second biggest trading partner, where deteriorating labour market conditions (ranked 54th globally, down 12 places from last year) and a heavy regulatory burden (ranked 128th in the world) weighed on the country’s competitive ranking.

“The performance is more startling when you consider that just five years ago New Zealanders were staring at ballooning deficits and a deep recession while the Australian government was debt free and riding the tailwind of a mining boom,” said Dr Hartwich.

New Zealand was ranked among the top 10 in the world for the quality of its institutions, health and primary education, higher education, goods and labour market efficiency, and financial markets development.

Dr Hartwich cautioned against complacency, noting that the country had failed to make any improvement on its innovation and business sophistication factors, ranking 27th globally – behind both Puerto Rico and Qatar.

“We need to focus on boosting our capacity to innovate and in areas of the economy besides our traditional agricultural strengths,” Dr Hartwich said. “The urgency for this is underscored when you consider that Switzerland, which was ranked second in the world for both innovation and business sophistication, was named the most competitive economy in the world for a fifth year straight.”

The next most competitive countries were Finland, Japan, Germany, Sweden, the United States, the Netherlands, Israel, Taiwan and the United Kingdom.

New Zealanders enjoy beating Australia but we shouldn’t let trans-Tasman rivalry blind us to the down side of these results.

That New Zealand’s competitiveness has improved is good but Australia going backwards is bad for them and us.

They are our closest neighbour and one of our most important trading partners.

If their economy is less competitive it makes it more difficult for our companies which trade there.

Our improvement and Australia’s backslide can largely be credited, or blamed, on different government policies.

In a column at the New Zealand Initiative, Hartwich, writes:

. . . Many of our New Zealand members have extensive business relations across the Tasman and are intimately connected to the Australian economy. It has been palpable in recent months how their perceptions of the two economies have changed. While they have become more and more buoyant about New Zealand’s domestic prospects, their assessment of the Australian economy has gradually deteriorated. . .

The survey of Australian business leaders, conducted by the Australian Industry Group, revealed that the most problematic factors for doing business in Australia are restrictive labour regulations, inefficient government bureaucracy, tax rates and tax regulations.

New Zealand, on the other hand, shows an altogether more promising picture. The greatest objective difficulties are macroeconomic circumstances and, unsurprisingly, market size. However, the country scores high for the quality of its institutions, its education and health systems, its goods and labour market efficiency as well as the development of its financial markets. The areas in which kiwi business leaders see the greatest need for improvement are infrastructure, the education of the workforce and the country’s capacity to innovate.

Again, I would take issue with the WEF’s macroeconomic assessment. On New Zealand, it seems too pessimistic to me.

There are some obvious macroeconomic dangers for the New Zealand economy, in particular an overheating property market. On the other hand, fiscal policy has been going in the right direction for the past five years. The current government has maintained spending discipline in the most adverse circumstances.

When Bill English became Minister of Finance in 2008, he not only had to confront the repercussions of the global financial crisis, but also inherited an economy in recession, a collapsed non-bank finance sector and the prospect of deficits for years to come. To make matters worse, two earthquakes destroyed the CBD of the country’s second largest city, Christchurch.

Despite this, the New Zealand government remained committed to returning the budget to surplus while trying to provide some stimulus through income tax cuts. The strategy worked: The New Zealand budget will be in surplus from next year and growth is steady.

This macroeconomic outlook directly translates into the economic mood. According to the ANZ Business Outlook survey, a net 48.1 percent of New Zealand firms expect general business conditions to improve in the year ahead, down from a 14-year high of 52.8 percent in July. In contrast, last month’s National Australia Bank’s survey of Australian business confidence fell to its lowest level since November 2012.

Just this week, Newport Consulting revealed that almost 60 per cent of Australian business leaders believe that Canberra is working against them. Only 13 per cent of New Zealand business leaders said the same about their own government in Wellington.

The same survey also showed that a vast majority of Australian executives experienced a slow-down in the Australian economy, whereas only 37 per cent of New Zealand corporate leaders said the same about their own economy. . .

This reflects well on New Zealand and the National-led government’s policies but there is absolutely no room for complacency here.

The policies which helped New Zealand’s competitiveness have been consistently criticised by the opposition and the policies promulgated by Labour’s aspiring leaders are those which are doing the harm in Australia – restrictive labour regulations, inefficient government bureaucracy, tax rates and tax regulations.

The improvements in New Zealand’s economy which have boosted our competitiveness have taken a long time and a lot of hard work. that isn’t finished yet but all the good could be undone in a very short time with a change of government.

If we don’t have a government determined to maintain spending discipline and focussed on policies which make it easier to do business and employ people, we’ll be following Australia backwards.

%d bloggers like this: