Labour u-turn on HB water storage

A big increase in irrigated land is supporting increased agricultural production

The irrigated land area has increased in the past five years by an area the size of lakes Taupo and Te Anau combined, Statistics New Zealand said today.

The total irrigated land in New Zealand increased by 102,000 hectares between June 2007 and 2012, new information from the 2012 Agricultural Production Census shows. “Canterbury had the biggest increase in irrigated area, with an extra 60,000 hectares since 2007 – this alone covers an area the size of Lake Taupo,” agriculture statistics manager Hamish Hill said. Other regions to gain more irrigated area were Southland and Manawatu-Wanganui. This increase in irrigated land has helped support increases in agricultural production.

Total dairy numbers also significantly increased, from 5.3 million in 2007 to 6.4 million in 2012. “The additional dairy cows will produce around four times the total amount of milk that New Zealanders consume each year,” Mr Hill said. Exports of milk powder, butter, and cheese increased by 27 percent in the last five years.

Regions that had significant shifts in dairy numbers between 2007 and 2012 included Canterbury, with an increase of 445,000 dairy cattle, Southland, with an increase of 238,000, and Otago, with an increase of 118,000. . .

That increase in production means a lot more jobs, more resilient and secure communities and more export income.

The experience in North Otago shows that the economic and social gains don’t have to come at the cost of the environment.

You’d think a party which says it supports economic growth and wants more employment opportunities would understand the benefits and support more development, but Labour doesn’t.

Minister for Primary Industries Nathan Guy says he is shocked at the Labour Party’s u-turn on supporting the Ruataniwha water storage scheme in Hawke’s Bay, despite previously indicating their support.

“The proposed Ruataniwha water storage scheme has the potential to irrigate an extra 25,000 hectares in Hawke’s Bay. This would be a major boost to exports, jobs and growth in the region.

“In October last year Labour MPs Shane Jones and Damien O’Connor visited the site and said it made a “very good case” and that “It is an obscure part of the country that [will cope] with such a large structure.”[i]

“Now they have been over-ruled by Stuart Nash, a rejected ex-MP who says “…Labour will not be funding water storage schemes if elected in 2014…”

“This is a slap in the face for farmers and Hawke’s Bay. I would have thought the severe drought this summer has made the need for this type of project even more obvious.

“The drought has highlighted that we don’t have a water shortage in New Zealand, but a shortage of storage options. We only capture two per cent of the rainfall that falls on New Zealand with the rest running out to sea.

“Water storage can have real environmental benefits. Increased river flows means more water for recreational users in summer, and improved habitats for fish and birdlife.

“This is why former Fish & Game regional manager and senior freshwater ecologist at the Cawthron Institute, Iain Maxwell, has come out publicly in support of the scheme.

“Labour are anti-progress and don’t care about jobs and investment in provincial areas. They are opposed to any new mining, energy and irrigation projects, and want to bring in a capital gains tax and an enlarged emissions trading scheme which would hammer rural communities,” says Mr Guy.

The Government is investing $80 million this year into a new Crown company to act as a bridging investor for irrigation projects. In total, up to $400 million will be invested in regional-scale schemes to encourage third-party capital investment.

The Government is also funding $35 million towards the Irrigation Acceleration Fund to help suitable projects reach the prospectus-ready stage. Last year the IAF and Hawke’s Bay Regional Council jointly funded a $3.3m feasibility study of the Ruataniwha Water Storage Project.

The drought has had a huge economic, social and environmental impact on the regions affected.

Canterbury and North Otago were insulated from the worst effects of the long hot, dry summer because of extensive irrigation.

The need for irrigation in Hawkes Bay should be obvious and it isn’t difficult to put a case for the government to help schemes get underway with for example a loan to cover the costs until the water is fully allocated.

This is just another example of labour saying it wants more growth and jobs but not supporting initiatives that will provide them/

 

4 Responses to Labour u-turn on HB water storage

  1. Richard says:

    Excellent. My old chest nut, like Ele’s daylight saving- when are we going to see water transferred from the West Coast of the South Island to the East Coast providing hydro generation on the way?

  2. stuart Nash says:

    This is a total load of old bollocks. Guy has the wrong end of the stick – yet again. Labour’s not opposed to water storage at all, but what Labour does oppose is poor spending decisions that have a negative impact on a region’s economy, environment and its people. The example that Guy talks about is a classic case: there are many in Hawkes Bay who have major concerns about the Ruataniwha Water Storage Scheme that Mr Tremain and Mr Guy support so vigorously. For example, the Mayors of both Napier and Hastings have written an open letter to the Chairman of the Regional Council expressing significant concerns about the financial risks posed to ratepayers by the Council’s dam project. So great is their apprehension that they are demanding an independent review of the project’s economic and financial assumptions.

    HB Fish and Game and Ngati Kahungunu have both called for a ‘time out’ in the Regional Council’s rushed process. Colin Crombie, a prominent Napier businessman and philanthropist (and not Labour.!), has also publicly expressed major concerns about the process. The fact that not one farmer has signed up to the scheme says a lot…

    This is not Labour ‘opposing anything that could make our primary economy better’ but rather Labour expressing the misgivings echoed by a significant number of the Bay’s community and business leaders. I suggest that if Mr Tremain and Mr Guy talked to a few of Hawke’s Bay’s prominent constituents, they would get the same message that I have.

  3. Gravedodger says:

    Psst Stewart, getting elected Mayor is oftenunrelated to knowledge, intelligence or acumen.
    Bit like getting on the Labour List or being selected for winnable seat.

    Have you been to Nth Otago in high summer recently and were you ever able to view those Sidyesque brown limestone hills prior to the local effort to bring irrigation to the equation.

    If you can answer yes to both questions you would, if you allowed honesty to intrude, understand your flip flop is the Bollocks here.

  4. stuart Nash says:

    A flip flop is when you change your mind. Labour hasn’t changed their mind on funding water storage, because they never ever promsied to in the first place.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: