Is this what no-change voters wanted?

The Electoral Commission is recommending small changes to MMP :

The one electorate seat threshold for the allocation of list seats should be abolished.

• The party vote threshold for the allocation of list seats should be lowered to 4%.

• Candidates should continue to be able to stand both in an electorate and on a party list at general elections.

• List MPs should continue to be able to contest by-elections.

• Political parties should continue to have responsibility for the composition and ranking of candidates on their party lists.

• The provision for overhang seats should be abolished for parties that do not cross the party vote threshold.

• On the basis of current information it would be prudent to identify 76 electorate seats (in a 120 seat Parliament) as the point at which the risk to proportionality from insufficient list seats becomes unacceptable. New Zealand is unlikely to reach that point before 2026.

• The gradual erosion of list seats relative to electorate seats risks undermining the diversity of representation in Parliament. Parliament should review this matter.

The lower threshold would make it easier for smaller parties to enter parliament without winning an electorate.

Proponents of this will argue that it makes parliament more representative. However, I question how representative a group which requires only 500 members before it can register as a party really is.

Lowering the threshold also increases the tail-wagging-dog ability and increase the possibility of less stable governments.

Taking away the ability for parties which win a seat to bring in other MPs in proportion to their vote decreases proportionality. However, as this is one aspect of MMP which most people object to, it is likely to be one of the most popular recommendations.

Removing the provision for overhang seats caps the size of parliament at 120, reducing the number of list MPs if a party wins more electorates than it’s entitled to by its party vote.

These are small changes which won’t bring big improvements to MMP.

Justice Minister Judith Collins is encouraging people to comment on the proposed changes.

Submissions on the Proposals Paper close at 5pm on 7 September.

The Electoral Commission will then consider this feedback and report back to the Government by 31 October 2012 with final recommendations on whether any changes to MMP are necessary or desirable.

I wonder if the public would have voted against change had they known this was what they were likely to get?

6 Responses to Is this what no-change voters wanted?

  1. Bollo says:

    Wonder no more

    To oversimplify: we voted for no change and got small change. The alternative would have been voting for big change and getting it.

    Like

  2. Meg says:

    Removing the ‘coat tail rule’ changes the proportionality. And by reducing the threshold the tail wagging the dog effect is worsened. Madness.

    Like

  3. ihstewart says:

    500 seems reasonable to me. I note that Kyle Chapman seems to have about 30 followers in his right wing racist mob of morons. 500 is quite a hurdle I suspect.

    Like

  4. Gravedodger says:

    Ele, I agree wholeheartedly with your call for a much more demanding criteria for registering a party as a means of separating out fringe “political” groups from a much more appropriate status as Lobby groups by making the total “Members” a higher qualifying requirement.

    Like

  5. Certainly what this no change voter voted for (well, actually a smaller threshold, but still).

    The “keep MMP” group actually asked for the review to be undertaken before the the referendum, I don’t know why National didn’t do it that way.

    Like

  6. Andrei says:

    Lol – we all know that MMP is designed to keep people of substance out of Parliament so that the urban elite can rule with impunity.

    And thus we a blessed with 120 mps time serving hacks who rubber stamp the depredations of the ruling class

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: