Sorry not sorry

The only reason a senior MP would go on a hiding to nothing by standing in an electorate he couldn’t possibly win would be if he was desperately seeking publicity.

Labour’s Epsom candidate David Parker must have thought the strategy wasn’t working so he sought more publicity by asking for a guest post on Kiwiblog.

He was given plenty of rope. He didn’t hang himself but he did tangle himself up with it and fall flat on his face when he said the Sensible Sentencing Trust had bought a place on Act’s list for David Garrett through a large donation to the party.

It must be a difficult concept for a leftwing politician, so used to unions, to grasp. But most lobby groups are not politically aligned and don’t donate to political parties.

The SST and Act Party both immediately refuted the statement.

As soon as the lie was exposed, blog host David Farrar posted an update saying the statement was wrong.

Very belatedly Parker asked for this to be added:

Garth McVicar has today (25 October) said that the Sensible Sentencing Trust has not made donations of money to any political party, including Act. It appears from his statement that the only gift the Trust itself made to Act was David Garrett. What donations, if any, came from members of the so-called Sensible Sentencing Trust to Mr Garrett or Act  I do not know.

That’s a very sorry example of how to show you’re not sorry.

No voluntary organisation can control what its members do with their own money and what they do as individuals is their own business unless they choose to publicise it.

Had anyone made a large donation the party is required by law to declare it.

It would be difficult to know if an individual donor was a member of the SST or any other organisation unless they said so. Most voluntary organisations respect the privacy of their members and don’t make their membership public.

I don’t know enough about the law to know if what was written was actionable.

But like most not-for-profit groups , largely run on the goodwill of volunteers, the SST will need every cent it raises for its own work and this slur on its integrity will damage its ability to fund raise.

However, the greater damage is that which was self-inflicted. Mud spatters the one who throws it and this episode has left Parker looking both petty and dirty.

4 Responses to Sorry not sorry

  1. gravedodger says:

    I read the whole bunch of spinach and was left wondering “if he is a future leader of Labour” then we must immediately remove the electoral cycle from our planning.

    Things are not looking up for the rabble, All Blacks won the cup and all the Red team got was disappointment and an image of a fumbled handshake, then Moody’s came out with what could only be described as an endorsement with no ‘downgrade’ in response to the PREEFU.

    Of course the value of that mechanism introduced by National was indelibly tarnished when the financially crippled “history teacher” reincarnated as an economic wizard hid the big black hole in the ACC accounts in 2007.

    Perhaps the towering intellects running the Labour campaign should consider abandoning the historical “Red” for Black and White with good ole Winnie’s blessing and maybe a bit of the RWC might hold them in the high 20s.

    Like

  2. “The only reason a senior MP would go on a hiding to nothing by standing in an electorate he couldn’t possibly win would be if he was desperately seeking publicity.”

    After losing the Dunedin North nomination, it was a hiding to nothing in Waitaki or Epsom. Which would have more publicity?

    Like

  3. Which hole? The one that seems to have magically fixed itself? Cullen 1 – Smith 0.

    Labour and National seem to agree that the RWC will have no effect on the election result.

    The PREEFU’s forecasts are wildly optimistic. With no export lead recovery and Fletchers trying to drag out the Christchurch goldmine for as long as possible, where are the jobs going to come from. Indications are public servant cuts will continue, while companies waiting for better times to save them will fail. Take the bakery firm in Taranaki.

    Like

  4. James J.REad says:

    A simple study of strategy would show why David Parker is doomed in Epsom. Labour doesn’t want to alienate Maori who generally vote centre left. With 60 per cent of those imprisoned being Maori, it can’t afford to be hard on crime unlike ACT.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: