Australia repopens live cattle trade to Indonesia

Australian Agriculture Minister Joe Ludwig  has reopened live cattle trade to Indonesia on condition exporters are responsible for the welfare of stock sent for slaughter. 

Although there have been no inspections of Indonesian abattoirs by Australian officials, Senator Ludwig said export permits would be issued only if exporters complied with a new system that ensured individual cattle were tracked and slaughtered under international standards.

The ban, which was imposed after evidence emerged of Australian cattle being treated brutally in Indonesian abattoirs, has devastated the $320 million a year industry and sparked tension with Australia’s nearest neighbour. Senator Ludwig’s decision means Australian exporters can now apply for export licences to start shipping stranded cattle to Indonesia if they meet strict conditions to track animal movements to ensure their humane treatment.

Cattle producers in the Northern Territory and northern Western Australia have few other options for selling prime stock.

When we were there last year, Indonesia had changed the rules, reducing the weight of cattle which could be imported and that was putting huge pressure on station budgets.

The change was made because Indonesia wanted to increase domestic production to reduce its reliance on imports. The ban has added impetus to that:

The Indonesian government described the scrapping of the ban as ”great news”.

Deputy agriculture minister Bayu Krisnamurthi said Jakarta is now rethinking its reliance on live cattle imports in the wake of the ban.

He said Indonesia’s recent experiences with Australia show that depending on food imports is risky.

The ban cost Australia 10s of millions of dollars. If Indonesia does manage to increase its self-sufficiency it will have a major impact on Australia and northern cattle producers in particular.



2 Responses to Australia repopens live cattle trade to Indonesia

  1. gravedodger says:

    Can someone with a deeper understanding than me, please explain why a trade with an already high risk exposure with climate and political instability clearly apparent, not be getting the “product into a more stable state by slaughter in Australia and dealing with a chilled product that can be diverted, recut, or even frozen.
    Any crop at harvest , slaughter, consumption stage becomes very vulnerable to a hiccup however minor and of course with the arbitrary reduction in animal size exposure to manipulation by unscrupulous traders.

    I supported live sheep shipments to the Middle East many years ago to develop markets and as a side benefit, demonstrate to intransigent unions that their “old good days” were numbered but was very aware of the pitfalls of such vulnerability and public perception of animal welfare were not going to allow a long term activity.

    I realise moving the meat to remote ares while walking and not requiring refrigeration has clear logistical appeal but anyone with a pinch of knowledge of how quickly meat becomes inedible with exposure to stress and the high incidence of dehydration that will accompany it will quickly see that trade such as this is no long term solution..


  2. homepaddock says:

    I think lack of refrigeration in Indonesia and that government’s desire to increase its own herd (some Australian cattle are kept for breeding) is part of the answer to your question.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: