The reaction to Chris Trotter’s The Incredible Lightness of Being John Key is a telling illustration of how we see what we want to see.
Those of us on the right, like Kiwiblog, saw the positives while on the left people who’ve responded with comments and Deborah’s post at In A Strangeland show the negatives.
Like most of Chris’s works, it’s a masterful piece of writing which can be read in many ways. The reaction shows that most of us who are politically aligned tend to have our prejudices confirmed in what we see, hear and experience.
That is why the political centre is so crowded.
That’s where most of the swinging voters are. Gaining their support is less difficult than trying to change the minds of people whose allegiance is confirmed or those whose views tend more towards the outer reaches of the political spectrum.

“Beneficiary bashing? Never from the man who was brought up by a solo mother in a state house and knows that people sometimes need help.”
I suppose the clever tactician will leave Paula Bennett to do that on his behalf.
The buck does stop with Key. Doesn’t it?
LikeLike
So far John Key has displayed the characteristics of being a great PM, don’t like his government that much at times but the man himself is on top of his game.
Politics is the art of the possible they say and he pulls it off well.
LikeLike
To add to the congestion in the middle of our political spectrum is the fact that MMP delivers an opportunity for single issue “partys” with little regard for any wider political viewpoint to compete for segments of those center voters with minority candidates of minority partys who would never appeal to sufficient support in an electorate vote to get anywhere nearer the legislature as a representative of all voters in that electorate on a simple majority, than the front steps where their simplistic, minority views should be heard (as a protest movement) not as deciding votes within the parliament frustrating the hard decisions on where our country needs to go for the betterment of all.
LikeLike
In A Strangeland’s diatribe is mostly a reflection of how incredibly lucky Key is to be successful and wealthy compared to a number of hoary old lefties’ hobby horses. So lets take the period of time since Key was born and look at some of those metrics..they are colour, sex, able bodied, intelligent, access to state house, free education.
Colour, how come Brack Obama was elected from a minority group to be the most powerful politician in the world, or more Maori in Parliament than reflects their actual representation in the general public?
Sex, how could Margaret Thatcher rule Great Britain, or Helen Clark in NZ, or the two most powerful public servants in the Bush administration Rice (Sec Def) and Powell (Sec State) be there.. and Black to boot?
How could disabled George Hawkins remain in our Parliament these many years, or Steven Hawking be the greatest living scientist, Nerali Fairhall win gold in archery or blind David Blunkett be Education Minister in Blair’s govt?
How could John Key be similtaneously an intellectual lightweight but fiendishly clever, or Spud Bolger be an uncultured uneducated peasant but be the 3rd or 4th longest serving PM, and in his dotage the goto man for Labour with Kiwirail?
How could there be so many famous, wealthy and brilliant Americans get there arising from grinding poverty and no state house?
How can it be that when Key was getting his “free” education there were just 41,000 in the tertiary system, but today with student loans there are 460,000?
When you look at it objectively, in our Western societies there are only small (10-20%) of Blacks/Maori/PI, yet they produce a President and numerous politicians that statistically shouldn’t have happened since Key’s birth and
its the same with the quite small numbers of disabled. Despite all the chatter about discrimination against minorities we have more that enough.. statistically so.. to say that success, fame and fortune is not an exclusive property of a White majority.
JC
LikeLike
Well said JC.
Andrei – I agree.
LikeLike
Here are my guesses for the Thursday quiz.
1. W.H. Auden
2. 1066 or thereabouts.
3. Atlantis.
4. Max Planck.
5. Not sure, maybe Obama or Will Smith.
PS: I reserve the right to change these once the questions are published.
LikeLike
Too lucky, The guy has a mountain of cash, houes galore, celebrity status and a lovely family. He is just so bland. Nice but bland. Can we now have Mr Egnlish, not so lucky, but very intellectual…
LikeLike
Further to JC’s comment, I would guess that all the people he mentioned who have succeeded despite their disability or minority status, did so because they chose not to waste their lives moaning about how things are so difficult. They just knuckled down and got on with it. This attitude I believe is the greatest contributing factor to success.
LikeLike
Tanz – in what way does “The guy has a mountain of cash, houes (sic) galore, celebrity status and a lovely family. He is just so bland. Nice but bland.” not describe Bill English?
LikeLike