Report confirms wisdom of decision to end travel perk

The independent investigation found no systemic abuse of the  MPs’ travel rebate by Pansy Wong and her husband Sammy.

Speaker Lockwood Smith said:

“The investigation, conducted for the Parliamentary Service by former senior public servant Hugh McPhail, looked into 13 international trips made by Pansy Wong and her husband together or separately since 2000. It found that one trip, a flight from Beijing to Lianyungang, China in December 2008, could have been in breach of the Speaker’s Directions.

“The report notes that while this trip was unplanned and inadvertent, it could be construed as having been for a private business purpose. It recommends that Pansy Wong and her husband should repay the travel rebate for that trip of $237.06 each.

“Otherwise, the report found no evidence that Pansy and Sammy Wong had not com plied with the Speaker’s Directions regarding private international travel,” Dr Smith said.

The investigation also looked at the use of the electorate office as the registered address for a ocmpany and found no evidence the office was ever used for private business purposes.

What looked like a large bomb has turned in to a small cracker albeit a  very costly one for Pansy who said:

“I apologise, and I will refund the level of rebate attributable to the section of the trip, which amounts to $237.06 each for my husband and myself,” Mrs Wong says.

“The experience of the past three weeks is not something that I would want to repeat.

“I am grateful for the support I have received from family, friends, supporters, and colleagues during this difficult period. . .

“While it is my hope to return to Cabinet, I understand that it has to be earned, and my energy and focus now will be used to serve the people of Botany and promoting the interests of ethnic communities across our country. I am looking forward to returning to Parliament.”

This episode was the last straw which showed up the faults in the travel rebate scheme.

MPs should be paid a reasonable a mount for the work they do, there should be an open and transparent process for paying work-related travel costs and private travel costs should be their business paid from their own funds.

UPDATE: Kiwiblog has more which shows the length the Wongs went to to comply with the rules and avoid any conflict of interest.

2 Responses to Report confirms wisdom of decision to end travel perk

  1. Richard says:

    Patsy Wong and her husband did go to some length to comply with the rules. Unfortunately when the news originally broke there was the hint in MSM and blogs because of the Wong’s ethnicity there was more to this than if they were born Nzrs. How sad. Patsy seems to me to be a thoroughly decent,if not a little too earnest, person. Her shame will be manifestly greater because of her ethnicity just like many cultures in Asia stretching to the Middle East; losing face.
    Yet we seem to have short memories when it comes to the likes of finance company directors and property developers who fail and are allowed to operate again without impunity.
    Yes, its a good thing that subsidies have been scrapped. But I wonder how long this has rort been going on.


  2. Fredinthegrass says:

    Oh, Richard. How true.
    Tvnz leads with this ‘scandal’ – all $474.12 How sad is that.
    If only Mr. “dirtdigger” Hodgson spent his time chasing those who have swindled millions from those unwary, and often aged, investors in Finance Companies.
    And Mr. Philin Goff seems to think there is something of a cover up.
    It’s all rather sad really.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: