Justice no longer delayed

Justice delayed is justice denied and bottle necks in our courts are a growing problem.

Justice Minister Simon Power has released plans to streamline proceedings including:

  • Requiring the defence to identify and disclose issues in dispute before a trial. This is estimated to result in a savings of 450 court days a year, or 10% of the expected total trial sitting time under the new regime
  • Allowing courts to proceed in the absence of a defendant if the court is not satisfied the defendant has a reasonable excuse for their absence.
  • Requiring the court to take into account a defendant’s compliance with procedural matters as a mitigating or aggravating factor at sentencing.
  • Allowing the court to impose cost orders against the prosecution, defendant, and defence counsel if it’s satisfied they have failed, without reasonable excuse, to comply with a procedural requirement.
  • Allowing greater flexibility to continue with a trial when jury numbers fall to 10.
  • Ensuring guilty pleas are entered as early as practicable to help avoid unnecessary delay.
  • Promoting out-of-court discussions between parties so there are fewer adjournments and shorter hearings.
  • Reserving jury trials for the most serious and complex cases, including by raising the threshold for a defendant electing a jury trial from crimes carrying a penalty of more than three months’ to those carrying more than three years’ imprisonment. This is expected to cut the jury trial workload by 300 to 600 trials a year (a reduction of 25-45% in the jury trial workload).

He said  the changes have the potential to free up 16,000 court sitting hours each year by delivering benefits which include:

  • 43,000 fewer court events. 
  • 1,000 to 1,400 fewer cases that need to be designated for trial by jury. 
  • 300 to 600 fewer cases that actually proceed to a jury trial. 
  • Shaving about 13 weeks off the time it takes for a jury trial case in the District Court or High Court to go through the pipeline from the time charges are laid to completion.
  • Savings of about $24.3 million over a five-year period.

“I’m a strong believer that justice delayed is justice denied, and this bill will ensure that timely justice is delivered for victims, witnesses, defendants, and the community.

“The key legislation currently in place dates back to the 1950s and has been subject to years of ad hoc reform.

“It’s been clear for some time that the excessive costs, the undue delays, and the needless complexities which govern criminal procedure needed to be addressed.

“We cannot continue to mask delays and inefficiencies in criminal procedure by simply building more courthouses and appointing more judges.

“I’m committed to improving the criminal justice system, particularly for those who find themselves in it through no fault of their own, while maintaining a defendant’s right to a fair trial.

“I’m confident this bill will achieve both.”

 Delays aren’t fair to the accused, victims or witnesses. They add to the costs in both financial and emotional terms.

These changes, at first reading, look like they’ll stop unnecessary delays without prejudicing the right to a fair trial.

If not, people with concerns will have an opportunity to add safeguards during the select committee process.

5 Responses to Justice no longer delayed

  1. robertguyton says:

    Ele – you’re a keen defender of the Nats. How do you respond to this?

    “Links between former prime minister Dame Jenny Shipley and businessman Sammy Wong are under scrutiny as his wife, former ethnic affairs minister Patsy Wong, remains under a cloud. Labour yesterday questioned why a company in which Mr Wong and Dame Jenny are shareholders was registered at the same address as Mrs Wong’s publically funded electorate office in Auckland. Dame Jenny’s husband, Burton, was a director of the firm, Shipley and Wong, Labour strategist Pete Hodgson said. Speaker Lockwood Smith refused to comment. Prime Minister John Key also refused to comment and said he would advise Mrs Wong not to answer questions.” Fairfax

    Don’t know about you, but I can smell something vile.



  2. homepaddock says:

    Robert – your first comment here asked what you should do with an off-thread comment and I said leave it on Your Page which you’ll find at the top of the page.

    I read your blog if I want to comment on your posts I will you don’t need to leave thread-jack comments asking me questions.


  3. robertguyton says:

    Ele – Lockwood Smith is refusing to comment, ‘John’ is refusing to comment and instructing Wong to say nothing and now you are refusing to comment.
    Of all people, you ought to have an opinion about this. You regularly promote the National Party and it’s actions, yet you’re not willing to, as you say, ‘answer questions’ about them.
    If you were to ask me a question about the Green Party, for example, on my blog,I’d be more than happy to have a go at answering you.
    Why not here on this thread?
    Aren’t you being rather precious?


  4. homepaddock says:

    Why not here on this thread?

    Because it’s off-topic and I set up Your Page to cater for exactly this sort of thing.


  5. robertguyton says:

    Sort of a ‘safe house’ or ‘decontamination chamber’
    What though, do you think about the business of Shipley and Wong and of Key and Smith’s ‘shutdown’ tactics?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: