ECan couldn’t, commissioners will

The decision by Ministers for the Environment and Local Government, Nick Smith and Rodney Hide, to replace Environment Canterbury with commissioners would not have been made lightly.

But this is what the independent review panel chaired by Wyatt Creech recommended. It is also what the mayors of the area ECan covered and other groups including Irrigation New Zealand, requested.

ECan has been plagued by internal politics and delays.

Its rivers are among the most important to the country’s environment and economy yet ECan has failed to come up with a water plan.

Dame Margaret Bazley is chair designate of the commissioners. Kiwiblog notes:

The choice of Dame Margaret is a shrewd one. She is 110% non-partisan, and has a excellent track record of sorting out dysfunctional systems.

In a second post answering criticism that this over rides democracy he also points out:

. . .   it happened under the last Government, and to a territorial local authority which has far bigger impact on people’s lives than a regional council. Also done under urgency, and also done at the request of local Councils – but in this case the ten or so territorial authorities.

What is the big difference?

National in Opposition supported Labour, because they put doing the right thing ahead of petty politics. If a Council has not managed a water allocation plan after 18 years, then it is a pretty sure sign than things are wrong and need fixing. Just waving a stick and saying “try to do better” has not worked.

The ministers’ media release includes a comprehensive Q&A which includes extracts from submissions and lists other bodies which have been replaced by commissioners – Rodney District Council, Auckland  and Hawkes Bay District Health Boards and 30 Boards of Trustees.

Even with these precedents, replacing a regional council is a radical move.

However, ECan has had 18 years to come up with a water plan and failed dismally. The problem of water allocation and quality in Canterbury requires urgent action.

ECan couldn’t do it and the commissioners will.

They have a demanding job ahead of them and one which must be done as quickly for the sake of the region’s water, wider environment and economy and to enable the return to elected councillors as soon as possible.

4 Responses to ECan couldn’t, commissioners will

  1. Adolf Fiinkensein says:

    Help me out a little here.

    What is it about these commissioners which makes them capable of doing in eighteen months what the gang of dils could not do in eighteen years?

    Is the answer an absence of lefties?

  2. Will the commissioners implement the CWMS any faster?

  3. homepaddock says:

    Adolf – a focus on solutions rather than politics will help.

    Daniel – I hope so.

  4. gravedodger says:

    As I commented elsewhere yesterday is this the time to look at a unitary authority or maybe two as this is bigger than the apparent inability of Ecan to come up with a water plan and other political/idealogical idiocy in local govt. Waitaki river (it is the major generator resource and lies on the border of two regional authorities), Pegasus Town , Water storage systems, inter authority scrapping that only benefits the lwyers and many more examples of wasteful activities that only occur as the funding is considered an inexhaustible resource.
    Note carefully who are making all the protest noise, to a one they seem to be empty vessels that echo a lot but have nothing inside.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: