Otago Fish and Game council has told the national body it lacks confidence in its chief executive.
Areas of concern included a water campaign which failed to proceed in 2006, a lack of agreement over themes for pre-election advocacy, and the “divisive and costly” judicial review on high country pastoral leases taken without consultation with regional fish and game councils.
This action follows a similar move by Central South Island Fish & Game which was made public last week.
That judicial review was not only divisive and costly for Fish & Game it was very costly for pastoral lessees and the public.
Fish & Game is funded by fishing and hunting licences. It’s a public entity, established by statute and answerable to the Minister of Conservation.
It should have stuck to maintaining and enhancing recreational fishing and hunting, not taking the Crown and pastoral lessees to court.