Not easy no excuse not to try

The government is planning to tweak benefits to encourage people back into work.

On Q&A yesterday:

GUYON So this is quite interesting, it’s something we haven’t heard before, you are going to Cabinet with the policy to again send young mums who are on the DPB out to work when their child reaches a certain age, and to tighten the eligibility perhaps around sickness benefits or to reduce that in some way?

BILL Well these are policies consistent with the undertakings we made when we were in opposition.

GUYON But they’re back on the cards now that things are picking up a bit?

BILL That’s right yeah, we’ve always felt that we could do a better job of making sure people had more incentive about getting off welfare to make sure it’s a bit more difficult to get on those longer term benefits, because once people are on those they’re pretty much trapped out of participation in the work force.

Guyon is wrong about not hearing this before, as Bill said this was National’s election policy.

Not being new won’t stop criticism of it.

However, what the critics overlook is that while benefits help people in the short term it’s not good for the recipients or society if people who could work stay on them for years.

Finding work which is flexible enough to fit around child care needs for single parents isn’t easy. But not being easy isn’t an excuse for not trying.

2 Responses to Not easy no excuse not to try

  1. gravedodger says:

    Right of center voters, accept that welfare dependence is not in the best interests of society or the recipients of the benefit. At its establishment it was intended as a safetynet for a victim of unemployment illness or accident and their dependents. In those innocent times it was never envisaged as a lifestyle option, however that potential slowly dawned on some “get something for nothing” members of society. Then the educated among the socialists with their long term goal of manipulation of the people, hit on the solution of creating a natural support base of beneficiaries with the accompanying power to intimidate by impiied threat or scaremongering by bringing the threat of change initiated by an opposition party into play whether true or not. The Clark government brought this strategy to new heights with WFF and it is one thing that many of us on the Right of Center would wish the Key government to address with the large cusion of support they currently enjoy.

    Like

  2. Red Rosa says:

    In few years the biggest ‘beneficiaries’ will be farmers, through the ETS.

    But of course they are ‘entitled’ to this.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: